Hello PfSense masters,
I'm using successfully PfSense to manage the access of a wifi network
providing Internet to my village. At now, we have a simple setup on
the LAN side where all backbone network (antennas) and connected
people shares the same subnet, for ex : 192.168.1.0/24 :
Hi,
As we use an Alix 2d3 board with 3 ethernet interfaces, there is one
free at now : could we use this OPT interface to manage backbone
network, with an address in its subnet 192.168.1.0/24, and put an
address from 192.168.2.0/24 subnet on the LAN interface to serve
clients, provided these
Hello, setting simultaneous client connection limit allows you to
restrict the number of parallel connections to a server per client IP
address or client address block? When the limit is reached, it filters
all the new connections from that ip or it blocks all connections from
that ip, or it
I have a VoIP phone (Siemens S685IP) with the IP 192.168.1.103. I used
the traffic shaper wizard to setup some queues. However, nothing seems
to flow into the qVoIP during VoIP calls (the traffic seems to go into
qDefault). I tried to modified the rule, using the IP address instead of
the
Le Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:10:18 +0100,
Seth Mos seth@dds.nl a écrit :
Hi,
As we use an Alix 2d3 board with 3 ethernet interfaces, there is
one free at now : could we use this OPT interface to manage backbone
network, with an address in its subnet 192.168.1.0/24, and put an
address
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Fred Boiteux fblis...@free.fr wrote:
The different LAN subnets' trafic aren't VLAN tagged, and all traffic
comes from one Ethernet port (from the nearest antenna), so I don't
understand how VLAN could be used there ?
Most carrier-grade radios support tagging
I think the OP was referring to running two subnets concurrently on the
same wire, something I often have to do for various reasons, sometimes to
solve co-existence issues while renumbering a network. I have no idea how
to accomplish this in pfSense; apparently I haven't had to do this since I
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
I think the OP was referring to running two subnets concurrently on the
same wire, something I often have to do for various reasons, sometimes to
solve co-existence issues while renumbering a network. I have no idea
On 11/18/2010 11:16 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
I think the OP was referring to running two subnets concurrently on the
same wire, something I often have to do for various reasons, sometimes to
solve co-existence issues
Another easy solution is to just add another nic.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 18, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Karsten Becker karsten.bec...@ecologic.eu wrote:
On 11/18/2010 11:16 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
I think the OP was
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, fi...@7technw.com fi...@7technw.com wrote:
Another easy solution is to just add another nic.
Not an option in this case. The OP described a wireless network where
the client subnet and management subnet exist on the same physical
network. You can't change that in
11 matches
Mail list logo
