On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 02:25:26PM -0700, Tim Dickson wrote:
> > Now I'm trying to segment the /24 into 4 subnets with the pfSense
> > interfaces being:
>
> It sounds easy enough - but may be because I'm not understanding exactly what
> you want.
> But the simplest method I could come up with wo
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andreas Kaiser wrote:
>> That allows you to do any routing you want between interfaces / WAN and
>> gives you granular control of everything.
>
> *That* is exactly what I want ;-)
Have you turned off automatic outbound NAT and disabled or deleted all
the automat
Am 23.05.2011 um 23:25 schrieb Tim Dickson:
>> Now I'm trying to segment the /24 into 4 subnets with the pfSense interfaces
>> being:
>
> It sounds easy enough
Maybe for you… ;-)
> - but may be because I'm not understanding exactly what you want.
> But the simplest method I could come up with
> Now I'm trying to segment the /24 into 4 subnets with the pfSense interfaces
> being:
It sounds easy enough - but may be because I'm not understanding exactly what
you want.
But the simplest method I could come up with would be to setup your WAN to
accept every IP your ISP routes to you, then
Hi all,
first: I'm not really a network guy, but thanks to pfSense was able
to some advanced (at least by my measures) stuff by myself - until
now... So please be patient with me.
A Vmware host machine has 1 NIC and uses 1 public IP itself.
A second public IP (say 4.3.2.17/32) is used for the pf
On 5/23/2011 4:41 AM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
> nc: getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
What does your /var/etc/inetd.conf file look like on the working system
and the broken system?
> So yesterday I went ahead and told the thing to just upgrade to the
> latest build hoping tha
Hi,
I am on pfSense 2.0-RC1 (i386). Is there a way to measure or graph the
bandwidth usage of the VIPs or the bandwidth of the Virtual Servers
configured in Load Balancer? I need this because I need to find out which
website(s) are eating up the most bandwidth.
ShiB.
while ( ! ( succeed = try() )
Just put a new FW in production a day and a half/two days ago (it was a few
days old from a fresh flash to CF..
pfSense-2.0-RC1-2g-i386-20110519-1115-nanobsd.img) and I got the following
message in a browser when folks were trying to hit sites hosted internally
using NAT reflection:
nc: getadd
