I have configured a virtual IP with the address of 10.0.0.100.
When I do a traceroute to this IP from inside my network, first hop is
the gateway, then after that is gets passed out to my ISP? Something
isn't quite right here! I want to use this IP in a 1:1 NAT set
- Any assistance?
If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according to the guide
Pfsense MultiWAN Howto,
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/pfsense/tutorials/policybased_multiwan/
policybased_multiwan.pdf
If I am adding rules, and I check auto add firewall rule for NAT rules,
I am assuming that I will not have
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 17 December 2009 12:07
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Advanced outbound NAT -- Auto firewall
rules on or off?
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according
I can telnet to my main ISP IP, (tested from internet based linux box)
and get a conversation going with any of my internal servers no problem,
(bacula, IMAP, smtp, ssh) all work
When I telnet into my OPT1 IP address from the same system, the traffic
makes it in, but in the logs I noticed the
, Gabriel - IP Guys
gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Basically, what I want to do is have traffic come in on my secondary
ISP, and return packets return out the correct interface, instead of
being blocked. Is that possible?
Yes, and that's how it works by default.
It doesn't seem to work
From: Koray AGAYA [mailto:insanad...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 09:44
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Multiple Gateway
Hi,
I have a Real IPs OPT1 ( X.X.X.100 ), OPT2 ( X.X.X.101 ) , OPT2 (
X.X.X.102 ) , OPT2 ( X.X.X.103 ) on interfaces and Lan interfeces
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
Dear All
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schuh [mailto:michael.sc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2009 11:23
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Intentionally slow down traffic on
certain ports/ips
2009/12/4 Gabriel - IP Guys gabr...@impactteachers.com:
Dear All
Dear All,
I have multiple ISP's connected to my pfSense box, but only the ISP that
is configured as the WAN seems to be able to route traffic. Attempts to
come into ISP configured on OPT1 seem to make it to the firewall, get
through, but I see a entry in the firewall saying that a packet from
Dear All,
I'm getting this message in my logs - but I can't explain it, any help?
kernel: arp: 19.19.19.19 is on le2 but got reply from 00:01:02:03:04:05
on le1
I'm going to assume that this message is because it's received a return
packet, or an expected packet on a different
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 30 November 2009 12:06
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Weird msg in pfsense logs
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
Dear All,
kernel: arp: 19.19.19.19 is on le2 but got reply from
00:01:02
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 30 November 2009 13:14
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Weird msg in pfsense logs
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
suppress ARP messages when interfaces share the same physical
network
From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:millenia2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 30 November 2009 14:52
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Weird msg in pfsense logs
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:37:49 +
From: gabr...@impactteachers.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: David Burgess [mailto:apt@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 November 2009 15:36
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Weird msg in pfsense logs
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys
gabr...@impactteachers.com wrote:
Pfsense
Is it possible to SNAT a port instead of doing a 1:1 on an ip address?
---
Kind Regards,
Mr Gabriel (bberry mail)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Dear All,
If I have multiple domain names mapped to my external IP's how can I
forward requests to system1.domain.com:80 to a different system than
requests to system2.domain.com:80 using pfsense? Both have the same
external IP, but need to be forwarded to different machines
---
Kind
If your only working with a few servers, 5 - then I would consider
just adding those IPs to the host file on pfSense. No need for a shotgun
to kill a fly!
From: Ron Lemon [mailto:r...@maplewood.com]
Sent: 27 November 2009 15:10
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Split DNS
Required ingredients;
1: Google for something called 'unetbootin'
2: A USB stick
3: Your ISO
4: Half an hour of your time (x2)
:)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: 25 November 2009 15:05
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense
I have two isp connections, and currently send all my mail out via a
smart host. I also have incoming mysql/web connections, which go to
servers with static internal routes.
I figure that I have two choices.
1) Force all connections to a particular ip to be forwarded to the
second
Sorry guys, I think I just solved my own problem, I should change the
route on the client machine to use the pfSense box for packets going
back to the test server (duh)
From: Gabriel - IP Guys [mailto:gabr...@impactteachers.com]
Sent: 25 November 2009 22:53
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
20 matches
Mail list logo
