If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according to the guide
Pfsense MultiWAN Howto,
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/pfsense/tutorials/policybased_multiwan/
policybased_multiwan.pdf
If I am adding rules, and I check auto add firewall rule for NAT rules,
I am assuming that I will not have
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according to the guide
Pfsense MultiWAN Howto,
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/pfsense/tutorials/policybased_multiwan/
policybased_multiwan.pdf
I just looked at it. It's entirely correct.
If I am adding rules, and I
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mos [mailto:seth@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 17 December 2009 12:07
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Advanced outbound NAT -- Auto firewall
rules on or off?
Gabriel - IP Guys schreef:
If I enable Advanced outbound NAT -- which according
Hi,
I just updated to latest releng_1 and it still has this same problem.
I have a carp+dual wan setup and I'm trying to get outbound load balancing
to work, but when I make changes to the advanced outbound nat rules to work
towards getting load balancing to work, it causes my ipsec tunnel to
I answered this in another thread ([pfSense Support] pfsense beta-4
multiple ipsec clients from lan to wan) less than two hours ago.
--Bill
On 6/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just updated to latest releng_1 and it still has this same problem.
I have a carp+dual wan
I need to select the external proxy arp ip that is seen for several internal
hosts on the lan. For example: 10.0.0.32 needs to be seen as xxx.xxx.xxx.139
and 10.0.0.34 needs to be seen as xxx.xxx.xxx.141. I tried setting this up
using outbound NAT but looking at the states showed that the
Just realized I forgot to include some details in this message. I have dual
wan using policy based routing. Default traffic goes over a cable modem
(WAN). OPT1 is a range of 5 static IP's (xxx.xxx.xxx.138/29). LAN firewall
rule has 10.0.0.32 and 10.0.0.34 going over OPT1 interface.
Fixed in 0.88.2. Will be coming out soon. In the meantime issue a
update_file.sh /etc/inc/filter.inc from a shell prompt to get the fix.
Scott
On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, I can't for the life of me get it to work now.
I know I had it working in 0.86.4. I setup
On 10/19/05, Kevin Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, I can't for the life of me get it to work now.
I know I had it working in 0.86.4. I setup a normal port forwarding
rule + firewall entry, enabled advanced outbound NAT, added a rule for
interface WAN source 192.168.1.200/32 (computer
