Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Scott Ullrich
ping is about the must ugliest speed test I have ever heard of. use ipperf. there are discussions of this in our archive. And for the record freebsd DOES do ICMP rate limiting. Scott On 9/16/05, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/16/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I know that kernel in monowall 4.xx is faster than 5.xx used in PFSENSE.  But from this For the archives.  pfSense uses FreeBSD 6, not FreeBSD 5. --Bill

RE: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Robo.K.
  From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 4:42 PMTo: support@pfsense.comSubject: Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection. On 9/16/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Version 0.84.6   If

Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Bill Marquette
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Version 0.84.6   If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 ms and abou 700 - 90

[pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.

2005-09-16 Thread Robo.K.
Version 0.84.6   If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 ms and abou 700 - 900ms if i go to the menu, for example Traffic shaper.  I