Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
The pfSense box (1.0-RC3 still) in front of the colo servers that host
the project's websites is a WRAP. It pushes around 2-8 Mb at around
10-25% utilization, we can push it up over 20 Mbps outbound.
C
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> The pfSense box (1.0-RC3 still) in front of the colo servers that host
> the project's websites is a WRAP. It pushes around 2-8 Mb at around
> 10-25% utilization, we can push it up over 20 Mbps outbound.
Can you give a sketch of
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 16:54, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
As Adam said - it should. It depends on the specifics of your
traffic though. We had an installation that was
On Mar 26, 2008, at 16:54, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
As Adam said - it should. It depends on the specifics of your
traffic though. We had an installation that was getting a hard time
a
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
It should.
Thanks,
adam.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
