No.  Use the new Virtual IP screen to create virtual IPs that are
either proxy arp or "other" depending on whether those IPs are routed
to the physical subnet the box is on or to it directly.

--Bill

On 8/15/05, Paulus Edwin Prasetya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, it is really because of realtek, so I cannot NAT using
> xxx.xxx.148.11 or other on the wan with IP xxx.xxx.148.10?
> 
> Ted Crow wrote:
> > For my production unit, I have a SuperMicro 5013 server with 2 LOB
> > Intel Gigabit LAN/WAN interfaces and a PCI/64 Intel Quad Fast
> > Ethernet for my OPT interfaces.  Works great with top notch throughput.
> > (IIRC, I've been using this hw since 0.49)
> >
> > I pretty much gave up on Realtek a couple years ago, and now avoid
> > systems with built in Realtek NICs.  A while back I did a test with 11
> > Intel NICs in one pfSense box and it worked /flawlessly/.  So, probably
> > needless to say, I highly recommend Intel NICs.  In general practice, I
> > put 3Com NICs third on my list right behind Broadcom.
> >
> > *Ted Crow*
> > /MCP/W2K/
> > Information Technology Manager
> > *Tuttle Services, Inc.*
> > (419) 228-6262 x 247
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Sent:* Monday, August 15, 2005 1:54 PM
> > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@pfsense.com
> > *Subject:* Re: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on complex Network
> >
> > I have an old Dell Precission w/ PCI-X slots and use the Intel
> > (PCI/PCI-X) quad 10/100/1000 card (I have two working flawlessly w/
> > 0.74.8) that's my reccomendation - stick w/ intel on many/multi homed
> > (more than 2-3 NICs) boxes.
> > --
> > David L. Strout
> > Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
> >
> >
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     *Subject: *Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense on complex Network
> >     *From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     *To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     *Date: *08-15-2005 1:43 pm
> >
> >
> >     On 8/15/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >      > On 8/15/05, Paulus Edwin Prasetya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >      > > Hi,
> >      > >
> >      >! > I'm new to this list, any one can help me?
> >      > >
> >      > > I am setup a quite complex gateway using pfSense
> >      > > the box contain 6 NIC all using RealTek (rl0-rl5)
> >      >
> >      > Are you sure that all 6 Realtek NICS function correctly in the
> >      > machine? That's a lot of NICS and RealTeks at that (read: I would
> >      > use better nics such as intel/3com).
> >
> >     I wouldn't even recommend 3Com - I've had more tons of problems with
> >     them. Absolutely agreed though that Realtek suck *ss. Expect poor
> >     performance.
> >
> >     --Bill
> >
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <javascript:popup('/webapps/groupoffice_205/modules/email/[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]','650','500')>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <javascript:popup('/webapps/groupoffice_205/modules/email/[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]','650','500')>
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to