On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Bill Marquette
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm guessing it wouldn't take much to have write_config() dump a
> message to our standard event logger, which I believe makes use of
> syslog. I might poke at that in the next few days now that I think of
> it (2.0 onl
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Along those lines - one of the "in the future" items on the list for
> the autoconfigbackup is an option to email when the configuration
> changes. For some environments that would be nothing more than an
> annoyance, but c
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as i am investigating monitoring solutions at the moment i came up with an
>> idea, somebody has already implemented:
>>
>> what about regulary getting
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:10 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as i am investigating monitoring solutions at the moment i came up with an
> idea, somebody has already implemented:
>
> what about regulary getting the config.xml (not bad as backup as well) and
> checking it against a former -
Hi,
as i am investigating monitoring solutions at the moment i came up with an
idea, somebody has already implemented:
what about regulary getting the config.xml (not bad as backup as well) and
checking it against a former - good known config - configfile.
You'd notice then a change either in c
