Attention Firebox X Series Users - Testing
Needed
On 4/18/09 11:17 AM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
> Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense:
>
>
>
> Watchdog timeouts getting' you down? Thinkin' about throwin' that old
> Firebox in to the fireplace? Don&
On 4/18/09 11:17 AM, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense:
Watchdog timeouts getting' you down? Thinkin' about throwin' that old
Firebox in to the fireplace? Don't do that just yet! J
Thanks to the pfSense devs, along with Pyun YongHyeon, the maintainer f
> -Original Message-
> From: cbuech...@gmail.com [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Chris Buechler
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 1:12 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attention Firebox X Series
> Users - Testing Needed
>
&
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Cotter
wrote:
> Is there an update path from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3-RC1 embedded?
Not a guaranteed reliable one. You can grab an embedded update file
off the snapshot server but it may blow up.
That'll be resolved with the new embedded that's on the way, includin
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Cotter
wrote:
> Is there an update path from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3-RC1 embedded? I only see Full
> images on the mirrors. I can do a backup/swap CF/restore, but the box I was
> going to test on is 120 miles away.
I have not had a successful embedded in-place up
Is there an update path from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3-RC1 embedded? I only see Full
images on the mirrors. I can do a backup/swap CF/restore, but the box I was
going to test on is 120 miles away.
I have a pile of the X500 boxes here and would love to deploy them, but the
watchdog timeouts are killing me
stems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nelson [mailto:tnel...@fudnet.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:43 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attention Firebox X Series Users - Testing
Needed
Well, I threw the latest 1.2.3-RC1 on a CF card and booted up my X500.
I
Well, I threw the latest 1.2.3-RC1 on a CF card and booted up my X500.
I've been passing all sorts of traffic through it (WAN and OPT1 bridge)
with no pauses in traffic or watchdog timeouts. My traffic has been
anything from netperf tests TCP and UDP, raw FTP traffic, random web
browsing, and s
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
[snip
> BTW, any release date on the horizon for 1.2.3?
When it's done.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support
This is absolutely fantastic! While I'm not a fan of Realtek NICs, I
*really* like the Firebox x[5/7/10]00 series hardware. If you look in
the list archives, you'll see I had done some testing but never had
anything conclusive. I eventually just threw my X500 on the shelf.
However, I've just b
: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attention Firebox X Series Users - Testing
Needed
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense:
>
Glad to hear that looks like it fixes it. There's at least one thread
o
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense:
>
Glad to hear that looks like it fixes it. There's at least one thread
on the forum reporting this issue as well, might want to post to those
threads too to give those folks a heads up.
12 matches
Mail list logo
