[pfSense Support] updates for wrap

2006-09-04 Thread Alan Walters
I see some changes made to the cvs recently potentially allowing wraps to be updated. Was looking through the builder_scripts but did not see a script for full-updates on wrap. Was I deluding myself here. Anyway am going to work on this for a while hope some input comes back on this

Re: [pfSense Support] updates for wrap

2006-09-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/4/06, Alan Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see some changes made to the cvs recently potentially allowing wraps to be updated. Was looking through the builder_scripts but did not see a script for full-updates on wrap. Was I deluding myself here. Anyway am going to work on this

[pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Imre Ispánovits
Hi, I've just upgraded RC2 today to the latest pfSense-Mini-Embedded-Update-1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-03-06 It shows on system overview page as 1.0-SNAPSHOT-08-03-06 built on Thu Aug 10 19:38:26 UTC 2006 Did I missed something, or is it just wrong title there and I may ignore it safely? Otherwise

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/4/06, Imre Ispánovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've just upgraded RC2 today to the latest pfSense-Mini-Embedded-Update-1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-03-06 It shows on system overview page as 1.0-SNAPSHOT-08-03-06 built on Thu Aug 10 19:38:26 UTC 2006 Did I missed something, or is it just wrong title

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 9/4/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/4/06, Imre Ispánovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've just upgraded RC2 today to the latest pfSense-Mini-Embedded-Update-1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-03-06 It shows on system overview page as 1.0-SNAPSHOT-08-03-06 built on Thu Aug 10 19:38:26 UTC

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Imre Ispánovits
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:19:06 -0400 Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/4/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: The new images are 128 megs in size. I doubt you crammed 128 megs of data onto a 64 meg card!? http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1991.0.html

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Scott Ullrich
It's funny. I didn't flashed it with the full image, but upgraded (using firmware update with the mini-embedde-update file. It went fine, the system rebooted and I'm still using it right now. Should I get a 128MB card and flash onto it or be prepared for any unexpected phenomena? Yes, I

RE: [pfSense Support] updates for wrap

2006-09-04 Thread Nicolas A. Fabris
Hi folks! We are testing PPTP Server. Enable PPTP server Srv addr: 10.1.1.201 Remote addr range: 10.1.1.224 /28 Requiere 128-bit encryption When we test it from a XP or W2k client, we have 619 and 723 errors later of cheking username and password We tested in rc1, beta3 vers. Can

[pfSense Support] PPTP server

2006-09-04 Thread Nicolas A. Fabris
Hi folks! We are testing PPTP Server. Enable PPTP server Srv addr: 10.1.1.201 Remote addr range: 10.1.1.224 /28 Requiere 128-bit encryption When we test it from a XP or W2k client, we have 619 and 723 errors later of cheking username and password We tested in rc1, beta3 vers. Can

RE: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Craig FALCONER
Why not call them 1.0-SNAPSHOT-2006-09-03? At least they'll sort correctly in a listing. Or are we really talking about the 8th and 9th of march 2006? It proves that pfSense is a global programme, when date representation issues arise :) -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich

Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense snapshot 09-03-06 embedded

2006-09-04 Thread Imre Ispánovits
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:49:21 -0400 Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's funny. I didn't flashed it with the full image, but upgraded (using firmware update with the mini-embedde-update file. It went fine, the system rebooted and I'm still using it right now. Should I get a 128MB