[pfSense Support] Kudos

2009-11-09 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I upgraded the hardware of one of my pfsense, and all I had to do was documented (install PfSense, copy the config file, change the interface name because of the different nics in the new server) and it all worked well. It started working about 5 minutes after I booted the new server.

Re: [pfSense Support] throughput, haproxy

2009-11-09 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote: Now I'm totally lost:( I had this long thread this year on this issue here and eventually the only thing the guys could advise me is to buy a newer server. I did.  And while I do see an improvement in performance (it's

Re: [pfSense Support] throughput, haproxy

2009-11-09 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote: Contact me off list.  I have a kernel I need you to test. In the meantime, please try increasing these sysctl's: pfSense:~# sysctl -a | grep rx_processing_limit dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100

Re: [pfSense Support] throughput, haproxy

2009-11-09 Thread Lenny
Scott Ullrich wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote: Contact me off list. I have a kernel I need you to test. In the meantime, please try increasing these sysctl's: pfSense:~# sysctl -a | grep rx_processing_limit

Re: [pfSense Support] throughput, haproxy

2009-11-09 Thread Lenny
Lenny wrote: Scott Ullrich wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote: Contact me off list. I have a kernel I need you to test. In the meantime, please try increasing these sysctl's: pfSense:~# sysctl -a | grep rx_processing_limit