On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
Here's what ends up in slbd.conf when I save my config:
servicename:\
:poolname=poolname:\
:vip=x.x.x.x:\
:vip-port=80:\
:sitedown=x.x.x.x:\
:sitedown-port=80:\
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
There is another issue where TCP is always selected when you edit an
existing pool, haven't fixed that yet but will.
Just fixed, diff here.
https://rcs.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repos/mainline/commits
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Chris Flugstad ch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
So i have 2 WANS
100.100.100.4 DSL
216.127.123.4 Wireless back to Colo
When the Wireless backhaul is disconnected or down, anything else on its
subnet is not accessible over the other WAN. It's as if it only
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
Currently running:
1.2.3-RC1
built on Wed Apr 1 16:59:10 EDT 2009
In addition to a fiber connection at this particular location, there is also
a second connection brought in via a cable modem. The fiber
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
Good deal. I'll go to a later snapshot then.
Are upgrades between snapshots on embedded working at the moment, or should
I just reflash?
Yeah you got hit with the xmlparse.inc issue that was in snapshots for
a
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Atkins, Dwane P atki...@uthscsa.edu wrote:
We are trying to do a test upgrade using the snapshot,
pfSense-1.2.3-20090407-1035.img.gz. It took over 1 hour and 10 minutes and
the upgrade still had not completed. The current version of the device is
1.2-RELEASE
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello
I found that is a port for freebsd of vpnc cisco client.
http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/security/vpnc.html
http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/
This is usefull when you want to connect your
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
That's a bit of a problem. I always re-flash to update.
That won't be necessary for much longer. The next generation of
embedded (based on nanobsd) will be available in 1.2.x and 2.0
releases sometime in the next
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first of all, thanks for all the support!
Anyway, unfortunately, after all the hell I've been through with this, our
CEO is not interested in buying a new server:(
heh.. How about sorry, but there is no other
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello TIm
I have not good experiences good igb driver...
My experience was with
http://www.intel.com/Products/Server/Adapters/Gb-ET-Dual-Port/Gb-ET-Dual-Port-overview.htm
that uses 82576.
IMHO better choose
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Atkins, Dwane P atki...@uthscsa.edu wrote:
I am guessing I can do this with a firmware upgrade? I am not going on about
10 minutes. Can someone please give me an idea of how long this upgrade
should take?
Depends on the specifics of your hardware,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Gary Buckmaster
g...@centipedenetworks.com wrote:
This is not the way to do this as the configuration will not survive
reboots. You can set the MTU on the interface configuration page for your
WAN interface in the webGUI. I would encourage you to check that
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Juan Rivera
jriv...@americancableco.com wrote:
hey this is getting worse we can't even get to the home page now we have
to hit refresh over and over so we can get to the home page its running
really slow I think just like dial up lol well I don't know what else
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We've been playing around at work with binding multiple IP's to the
WAN interface so that we can port forward the same ports from
different IP's to different services on the LAN side.
Has anyone ever seen
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Graeme Evans
graeme.ev...@kcssolutions.co.uk wrote:
Situation:
I have a simple PFSense setup with a single PFsense 1.2.2 computer, 1 WAN
interface, and 2 Local interfaces - one named LAN (10.0.0.0/24), and the
other is Workshop (10.0.1.0/24). We have
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Graeme Evans
graeme.ev...@kcssolutions.co.uk wrote:
PS: anyone know why the registration system on the pfsense forum won’t send
activation emails – so I can’t register?
Oh, and I looked for your email address on the forum and it isn't
there. If you let me know
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
I had zero luck with this in the last few days. Here are some more details:
Internet -- PFSense -- procurve managed switch
I have tried three different computers, an old P3 based IBM desktop
with 512MB on a flash disk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense:
Glad to hear that looks like it fixes it. There's at least one thread
on the forum reporting this issue as well, might want to post to those
threads too to
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
There is definitely an upstream router, and I have physical access to
it but not console. I can power it off and on again, but it tends to
make the service provider unhappy. I do have a good working
relationship with the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Ryan L. Rodrigue
radiote...@aaremail.com wrote:
First. Thanks for making the best rouster software in the world.
Second. I'v searched, but i cant quite figure it out. I would like to use
captive portal. What I want is to have certain users based on windows
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dimitri Rodis
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:
Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration Server (ISA Server), and you
need to have AD.
I've used it, but only in this particular case. I do not know of anything in
the open source world that works reliably
Info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=428
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
You don't *have* to have two subnets, you can bridge OpenVPN, but it's
a bit convoluted, not documented well (yet), and generally I don't
recommend it. You rarely want broadcast traffic traversing a VPN.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Brian Josefsen josef...@sjovedyr.dk wrote:
Hi
I have 2
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Cotter
andrew.cot...@somersetcapital.com wrote:
Is there an update path from 1.2.2 to 1.2.3-RC1 embedded?
Not a guaranteed reliable one. You can grab an embedded update file
off the snapshot server but it may blow up.
That'll be resolved with the new
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Marty Nelson mnel...@transdyn.com wrote:
I'm sitting behind another pfSense box version 1.2.2
If you have the PPTP server enabled, you need to either:
1) disable it
2)
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Markus Golser elmar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi I'm wondering if there is a draft 802.11n mini pciE card that works
nice on pfsense 1.2.2
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Is_802.11n_wireless_supported
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Mikel Jimenez mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hi
Is possible to make a GRE tunel between two Pfsenses without using IPsec?
Not with nor without, until 2.0.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Pete Boyd
petes-li...@thegoldenear.org wrote:
Is there anything that can be done instead of replacing one of the 3Com
cards?
Sounds like a driver issue of some sort, trying 1.2.3 which has a
newer FreeBSD base may make it work.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Peter Allgeyer allge...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
I just encountered a problem with pftpx. We have a FTP-Server in the
DMZ-Zone. Entering ftp://ftp.server.ip from inside in the browser (for
example, command line ftp is the same) shows no listing. Reloading the
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Chuck Mariotti cmario...@xunity.com wrote:
To clarify further...
In this situation, we are downgrading to a T1 (1.5Mbit/1.5Mbit) connection
from a new service provider. The current connection is 3Mbit/3Mbit, works,
but is insanely expensive (way more than
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jure Pečar pega...@nerv.eu.org wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:41:30 +0100
Jure Pečar pega...@nerv.eu.org wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:37:27 +0100
Jure Pečar pega...@nerv.eu.org wrote:
Hello,
On 1.2-release running on two machines in carp failover mode,
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Android Andrew[:]
andr...@oberon.pfi.lt wrote:
Sorry for previous letter with bad subject..
Hello all!
We have faced the following problem:
after the upgrade of pfSense from 1.2-Release to 1.2.3-RC1, the access from
the
internal LAN1 network to FTP-server,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Jean Carlos Coelho
jean.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.. a question..
It is possible to install postfix in pfsense 1.2.2 only for mail relay ?
Not easily, I've tried before, there are a ton of libraries and other
misc. things not included in pfSense that
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
has anyone considered a transparent redirection of SMTP to a specific
SMTP relay, so that (e.g.) captive portal clients on wifi hotspot can't
send email without some level of control.
You can do that now with a
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:54 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to pfsense and a real novice with FreeBSD, so go easy on me ;)
I used the live CD of pfsense 1.2.3-RC1 to install to a hard drive for
use in a soekris net5501. When I boot while attached to the serial
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Jonathan Wanak jlwa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm about to update a remote pfSense installation I last worked on back in
version 1.0.2. I'm using a PII desktop with 128MB RAM and 3 NICs. The box
runs 2 LANs (public and private), utilizes Captive
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:37 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/21/1824220from=rss
What versions run in pfsense? Is this something we should be concerned about?
This is 6+ month old news, and it's lame, not sure why it's getting so
much
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:29 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I see the question in the archives, but no answer. What would be the
correct way to set up dynamic DNS on a multiwan setup?
You can't until 2.0. Only WAN is supported.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
In regards to alternate arch's, wouldn't something like ARM or MIPS provider
better PPS rates than x86(_64)?
No difference due to the architecture. There are some higher end MIPS
platforms that are equivalent to big $
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:30 AM, ozan ucar m...@ozanucar.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have pfsense 1.2.2 and install snort.Snort success installation but dont
update.
Oinkmaster code have, i go to snort update page an error Snort success
installation but dont update.
Snort changed around their
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Tebano epaminonda
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I've read that complete multiwan support will be available only with 2.0
version of pfsense, but I'd like to know if You've some suggestion for doing
something similar, also using many pfsense instead
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Rakthum_NetworkTelecom_IP#1
rakthu...@advanceagro.com wrote:
Hello all
My Pfsense is offline but I want install some packages .How can I
do?
You can't. It has to download the package list and the packages themselves.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tebano epaminonda
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Guys.
I where discussing of limitation reported into the features of:
Inbound Load Balancing
What exactly are you referring to?
-
To
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Steve Harman
steve.har...@envisional.com wrote:
Hi!
We have four internal NICs on our pfSense box; “LAN” , “LAN2”, “LAN3” and
“LAN4”.
I need to setup a static route for a remotely hosted network at our parent
company’s office so any traffic destined for
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
May I ask why pfSense web-interface has this option?
It needs to know for NAT rule generation and other purposes. It's a
hold over from m0n0wall, it could figure it out without specifying.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Joseph Wagner lawn.dart.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone been able to get pfsense to run properly on a Soekris net5501
embedded pc?
Lots of people.
I've installed the embedded image into my board and everything work fine
except I can't get any traffic to
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes you have to uncheck the Block private networks and the Block bogon
networks boxes on the WAN interface page, have you alredy done that?
You never have to uncheck that for access out to the Internet. Those
only
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Quickly looking at the previous posts, I don't see where you've specified
what type of connection you're setting your WAN to. Is it PPPoE? Static?
DHCP? Etc?
And also, is it on a private subnet? Same subnet as your
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Paul Cockings p...@cytringan.co.uk wrote:
Hello list,
I have an annoyance that is driving me bonkers. I have a Windows XP client,
a pfsense 1.2.2 configured as a transparent firewall, development webserver
(FreeBSD 7.2)
When I using SSH (Putty) or MySQL
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko
evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
from my experience failover takes has higher
priority than static route as it is implemented by means of pf rules.
Yes, that is true. Static routes direct traffic initiated by the
firewall to the
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com wrote:
Where can we make feature requests?
http://redmine.pfsense.org
with many still at http://cvstrac.pfsense.org as we haven't converted
everything over yet.
I also can't seem to find any decent documentation on the
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Volker Kuhlmannhid...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
On Tue 02 Jun 2009 02:35:55 NZST +1200, David Burgess wrote:
Have a look at these. http://www.soekris.com/lan16x1.htm The 2-port card
is low profile
Yes, sure. But how do you connect one of those to an ALIX board?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Federico Castro
A.fcastro1...@racsa.co.cr wrote:
Hi everyone.
I´m trying to setup an INTEL DG41TY board with 3 LAN cards. One integrated
RTL8111D and two D-Link 520 TX PCI.
The D-Links are setup without a problem but the Realtek doesn´t come up when
I boot
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Tebano
epaminondal_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've 2 isp with 2 different IP and routers.
So I've configured 2 pfsense in load balance and with carp between them
(internal and external, so I always has a single IP to manage with routes
and nats).
All
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Webmaster
Megastarwebmas...@megastar.fr wrote:
There is a bug when you want to setup multiwan + load balancing + carp. The
development team is aware of this.
Ermal committed a kernel patch to pf that should resolve this. It's
only in 8 builds at the moment, it
2009/6/11 Webmaster Megastar webmas...@megastar.fr:
Can you give us an idea of when it will be available in snapshots released
to public ?
Anything from 20090612 and newer should work (there aren't any yet,
they'll be there eventually). Please test and report back.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Paul
Mansfieldit-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
suppose we have two WAN ports and have turned on the automatic RFC1918
and bogon blocking; you can see the grey-ed out rules on WAN1 interface.
what's the best way to also do this on WAN2? in particular, how to
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Jose Hernandezj...@vidzone.tv wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday we had a service launch, and pfSense inbound load balancer let me
down big time… We have been using pfSense 1.2-release version installed on
Dell PowerEdge R200 and CARP for redundancy for around a year now,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, JJBonephat...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hello,
pfsense 1.22
we have a mail server:
mail.domain.com
We have two wan links
WAN_ATT (T1) and WAN (covad DSL)
reverse DNS is configured for the ATT link for mail.domain.com and for the
covad link as
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM, JJBonephat...@earthlink.net wrote:
Yes, setup your rules on the interface with the mail server accordingly.
I don't know how to set up pfsense to bind the mail server to the ATT
network interface instead of the Covad, can someone provide me with details
of how
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:38 PM, JJBonephat...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hello,
I didn't realize there is also a pfsense forum and that they are not
connected. Which is the best place to post technical questions about
configuration?
Which ever you prefer. Some people like the forum format better,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, JJBonephat...@earthlink.net wrote:
We've tried this 10 different ways, so far it has not worked.
Current Config is two pfsense 1.22 firewalls with CARP two WAN connections
(not load balanced or failover) (covad att), with a DMZ interface where
our mail and
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Tebano
epaminondal_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
I'm exploring features embedded into pfsense, and I was looking to
interesting features as RRD graphics of system activityes.
I've read on RRD also improvements introduced from the use of packages:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Joe Laffeyj...@laffey.tv wrote:
While I forgot to look when it happened, this was one of my thoughts, as
well. But then I thought to myself, wouldn't this cause connections from the
LAN to the WAN to fail as well? Or is the state table subdivided equally
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Bjoern Hellermailingli...@hellercom.de wrote:
Hello,
Im running pfSense 1.2.3 RC1 on standard PC hardware,
and everything runs perfect exept the DynDNS updater.
The new IP isnt sent to dyndns.org...
If I manually click on the Save button in the Dynamic DNS
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Vick Kheravi...@khera.org wrote:
Last time I set up an embedded (1.2.2 on my home router) I booted the
device, reset the DHCP lease on my desktop and connected to
192.168.1.1 and configured it by reloading the config file.
No serial port required, even though
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Guruprasad-Baysoftg...@baysoft.in wrote:
i had pfsense 1.2.2 and vpn not configured. I was connecting outside vpn
servers from my laptop thru vpn client and no issues. After upgrading
pfsense to 1.2.3RC1, i am unable to connect to outside vpn servers from my
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Aarno Aukiaaarnoau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Attached a patch against 1.2.3-rc1 fixing
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=1932, which was opened by a
co-worker of mine while I was on vacation. Let me know if de patch
fails against cvs/git. I'll have to
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Guruprasad-Baysoftg...@baysoft.in wrote:
I am using safenet softremote LT client software. My customer sent the
security policy editor config file. So i just imported that in my safenet
vpn client software and using. Hence i donot know what is the remote vpn
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Benjamin
Frommebenjamin.fro...@login-online.de wrote:
Hi List,
we have several tunnels between some pfsense 1.2.2 boxes. For phase 2 we
have configured AES256 as the only encryption algorithm and everything works
fine.
Now we upgrade one of the boxes to
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Joseph Hardemanjharde...@colocube.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to figure out how to setup multiple wan networks on a
single bridge.
For instance:
111.111.111.111/25 - em0/bridge0/opt1 - internal servers
222.222.222.222/25 - em0/bridge0/opt1 -
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Ho Sy Tanhosy...@gmail.com wrote:
I run pfSense-1.2.3-RC1 (FreeBSD 7.1), IPSec with IKE P2 AES 256, it work
fine.
That's with the older ipsec-tools version. The latest one wants
different syntax.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Bastien DARMONbdar...@horus-df.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way, in pfsense, to give the highest priority over the rest of
the traffic to an application running on a particular port?
You can shape this just like anything else, with the caveat that it
falls
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Ian Levesquei...@crystal.harvard.edu wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Ian Levesque wrote:
We're running DHCP and DNS on a pair of CARPed pfSense 1.2.1 boxen. Other
than the fact that they don't sync DCHP entries, it's been working OK for
us. However, we've
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Hello.
setup:
my LAN---192.168.8.0/24 pfSense 1.1.1.1/242.2.2.2/24 FW
198.x.x.0/24---remote LAN
I am asked to create Ipsec tunnel between 'my LAN' and 'remote LAN' but
these remote guys say that
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tim A.pfse...@lists.goldenpath.org wrote:
Attached a patch against 1.2.3-rc2 adding support for auto configuring
interfaces.
That's definitely a nice feature, though only suitable for addition to
2.0, so we'll need a patch for 2.0. The only thing from your
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Ermal Luçiermal.l...@gmail.com wrote:
To me this is a hack and not a feature.
There is a better way to do this things than kludge things here and
there in the code. The right fix was proposed once and not everybody
liked the POLA breaking.
I don't recall that
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Ermal Luçiermal.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Chris Buechlerc...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Ermal Luçiermal.l...@gmail.com wrote:
To me this is a hack and not a feature.
There is a better way to do this things
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chris Flugstadch...@cascadelink.com wrote:
False alarm
Still broken :(
Reset the state table on the firewall the client is behind and try again.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Angelonglrossi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a weird wireless connection issue with my new Nokia N97, hope someone
can help me.
You won't find a solution here, it's a wireless driver issue of some
sort and that would have to get fixed upstream in FreeBSD.
I will be presenting on pfSense at EuroBSDCon.
info here:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=481
and below
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Subject: [FreeBSD-Announce] Announcing EuroBSCon 2009
To: annou...@freebsd.org
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Hi All!
should the rule
pass out quick on bge1 all flags S/SA keep state label let out
anything from firewall host itself
allow IGMP packets out of WAN interface? Packets are generated by
igmpproxy
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Tim A.pfse...@lists.goldenpath.org wrote:
I tried to push this to the repo but it keeps saying not allowed.
Are you guys only using that internally?
You can only push to your own clones unless you're an authorized
committer, we don't let just anybody push
For those who don't follow the blog:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=472
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available -
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmatheus...@gmail.com wrote:
great news. just one question though. I use tinybsd for this embedded stuff,
is there any way to shrink this image (any way I can do myself, not the
project do for me) to fit 128MB cf I already have ?
Not easily.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:48 AM, bsdb...@todoo.biz wrote:
Hello,
I am about to answer a public tender and am looking for a reliable
open-source filtering solution.
I need to filter layer 3 and 4 of TCP/IP stack (TCP and Application layer)
specially for stream such as Peer to Peer - IM -
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Ermal Luçiermal.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Please pretty please do not make distinctions on lan/wan/optif i have
invested too much time to clean this!
I don't see anything that treats LAN/WAN/OPT improperly. When
auto-assigning interfaces, you don't have a choice but
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@fudnet.net wrote:
Hello fellow pfSensers! I've been quietly annoyed with a minor 'issue' in
pfSense for some time now and finally thought I'd bring it to light to see
if it's just me or if anyone else has the same problem.
I love my
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@fudnet.net wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@fudnet.net wrote:
Hello fellow pfSensers! I've been quietly annoyed with a minor 'issue' in
pfSense for some time now and finally thought I'd bring
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Paul Mit-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
Angelo wrote:
I have a weird wireless connection issue with my new Nokia N97, hope
...
Yesterday I bought a Nokia N97 and as soon as I came back home I started
playing with it. I joined my wireless network and typed
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
No, I can not see in logs. But on LAN I have
18:55:24.602839 IP 192.168.1.2 224.0.0.22: igmp v2 report 239.142.1.1
It does not go out of WAN. And when I disable packet filtering it does go out
of WAN.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Caroline
Stekkecaroline.ste...@univ-rennes1.fr wrote:
Hi !
I have installed PfSense on two servers DELL. I have on this servers a
network card of 4 ports GBE. I have a problem with this card, because
FreeBSD or PfSense, I don't know where is the problem can't
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Caroline
Stekkecaroline.ste...@univ-rennes1.fr wrote:
Thank you for you attention
But I have installed this version :
1.2.3-RC1 with FreeBSD 7.1
So for you my newer card, just can work with FreeBSD 7.2 ?
I don't know, but it's possible.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Caroline
Stekkecaroline.ste...@univ-rennes1.fr wrote:
Ok,
And did you know what is the procedure to compile the driver bge myself.
The bge driver is there already. If the NICs aren't detected, they
aren't supported by the bge driver in that particular FreeBSD
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, R. Th. Bootsvand...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:44 PM, R. Th. Bootsvand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have an asterisk server which is hooked up to 3 providers. With all 3
of them I have no problems connecting to my
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Suddenly I discovered pfSense-development distribution which has compiler
(yes, I was that stupid thad had not paid attention that there wer such
thing).
Now I'd like to play with igmpproxy package. Where
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Chris Buechlerc...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Thanks for quick report Chris. I am completely new to this stuff please
bear with me. Trying to accoomplish 'Clone the tools repo at
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
Well.. I installed
http://files.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/pfSense-Developers-1.2.2.iso.g
z and it gave me 7.0.
My systems run 1.2-RELEASE as I have some issues with 1.2.2
So you've been testing the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenkoevgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca wrote:
No, I've been testing igmpproxy on 1.2.2 and if it will work I'll have
to build one FW on 1.2.2.
Oh, that binary I put up a URL for was built on 7.1, you should be
trying at least 1.2.3-RC1 for that.
One
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, bsd...@gmail.combsd...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
first, i am a little confused at the versions of pfsense. currently i'm
running pfsense 1.2.3-RC1 built back in April of 09. it's not clear to me
where the 1.2.3 branch stands or what is the latest version of 1.2.3
801 - 900 of 1503 matches
Mail list logo
