Kevin Stange wrote:
You shouldn't be trying to send commands with /say as /say
is explicitly designed to bypass the command system.
I'm not. I'm sending text with /say but Pidgin (and Trillian, as you
said)
(mis)interprets it.
Not a big issue, I'm just a perfectionist ;-)
Regards,
David
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted
as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any incoming message of the form /me
foo as an emote. You're actually sending /me foo to the
2009/5/25 David Balazic david.bala...@hermes-softlab.com:
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted
as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any incoming message of the form /me
foo
Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote :
2009/5/25 David Balazic david.bala...@hermes-softlab.com:
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted
as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted
as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any incoming message of the form /me
foo
Message
Subject: Re: Regarding codes used for Pidgin
From: Ethan Blanton e...@pidgin.im
To: support@pidgin.im
Date: 5/25/2009 12:00 PM
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent
Jo-Erlend Schinstad spake unto us the following wisdom:
2009/5/25 David Balazic david.bala...@hermes-softlab.com:
Ethan Blanton wrote
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any incoming message of the form /me
foo as an emote. You're actually sending /me foo to the channel,
your Pidgin is
Michael Secord spake unto us the following wisdom:
I think the whole issue here, is that the /me is a good command, but
when you add /say in front of me, it should NOT interpret the /me as
the actual command, but just as plaintext. Basically using /say as
the escape character that would
: Regarding codes used for Pidgin
From: Ethan Blanton e...@pidgin.im
To: support@pidgin.im
Date: 5/25/2009 12:06 PM
Michael Secord spake unto us the following wisdom:
I think the whole issue here, is that the /me is a good command, but
when you add /say in front of me, it should NOT interpret
David Balazic wrote:
Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote :
2009/5/25 David Balazic david.bala...@hermes-softlab.com:
Ethan Blanton wrote
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted
as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin
Recently I tried to use /me code of IRC on pidgin and got same
result.Are there more such codes??
Please help
___
Support mailing list
Support@pidgin.im
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Hi,
Zeroedge Speed schrieb:
Recently I tried to use /me code of IRC on pidgin and got same
result.Are there more such codes??
Please help
These commands differ according to the used IM protocol.
Try /help to get a list of supported commands in your protocol.
Greetings
-Sascha-
Should have gone to the list...
And for the record: With commands I meant, features implemented in
Pidgin by the protocol plugin, not what is specified by the IM protocol
(though they usually match somehow)
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Regarding codes used for Pidgin
Datum
David Balazic spake unto us the following wisdom:
On that regard:
- me is listed twice in the /help for IRC
Yes.
- /say /me foo is not sent to channel, but interpreted as a regular
/me foo command
Not exactly. Pidgin interprets any incoming message of the form /me
foo as an emote.
14 matches
Mail list logo
