Re: Does Seamonkey's HTML editor make "conformity" modifications to HTML it saves?

2011-02-13 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/13/11 9:01 PM, Ed Mullen wrote: > Leroy Tennison wrote: >> I'm running into a problem with other HTML editors where they >> automatically do "helpful" things "for me" which are contrary to what I >> want and actually harmful to the final result. One example is converting >> the ASP indicators

Re: Does Seamonkey's HTML editor make "conformity" modifications to HTML it saves?

2011-02-13 Thread Ed Mullen
Leroy Tennison wrote: I'm running into a problem with other HTML editors where they automatically do "helpful" things "for me" which are contrary to what I want and actually harmful to the final result. One example is converting the ASP indicators to something unrecognizable which results in the

Does Seamonkey's HTML editor make "conformity" modifications to HTML it saves?

2011-02-13 Thread Leroy Tennison
I'm running into a problem with other HTML editors where they automatically do "helpful" things "for me" which are contrary to what I want and actually harmful to the final result. One example is converting the ASP indicators to something unrecognizable which results in the ASP code being inte

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread J. Weaver Jr.
David E. Ross wrote: On 2/13/11 1:39 PM, Ant wrote: On 2/13/2011 2:27 AM PT, Daniel typed: And i don't undertand why a browser can display a page correctly and was unable to "copy" this into a piece of paper... I'm with you on this, Ray, and I've got no idea why, if SeaMonkey has the da

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/13/11 1:39 PM, Ant wrote: > On 2/13/2011 2:27 AM PT, Daniel typed: > >>> And i don't undertand why a browser can display a page correctly and was >>> unable to "copy" this into a piece of paper... >> >> I'm with you on this, Ray, and I've got no idea why, if SeaMonkey has >> the date required

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Lemuel Johnson
J. Weaver Jr. wrote: NoOp wrote: On 02/10/2011 07:39 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This goes back all the way to Mozilla, so it may be a W3C compliance issue, but it's annoying nevertheless. On many websites, I can't seem to get a decent printout. For example, my local paper has a searchable ob

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Ray_Net
Ant wrote: On 2/13/2011 2:27 AM PT, Daniel typed: And i don't undertand why a browser can display a page correctly and was unable to "copy" this into a piece of paper... I'm with you on this, Ray, and I've got no idea why, if SeaMonkey has the date required to display something on the screen,

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Ant
On 2/13/2011 2:27 AM PT, Daniel typed: And i don't undertand why a browser can display a page correctly and was unable to "copy" this into a piece of paper... I'm with you on this, Ray, and I've got no idea why, if SeaMonkey has the date required to display something on the screen, it has to g

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Ray_Net
J. Weaver Jr. wrote: NoOp wrote: On 02/10/2011 07:39 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This goes back all the way to Mozilla, so it may be a W3C compliance issue, but it's annoying nevertheless. On many websites, I can't seem to get a decent printout. For example, my local paper has a searchable ob

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread J. Weaver Jr.
NoOp wrote: On 02/10/2011 07:39 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This goes back all the way to Mozilla, so it may be a W3C compliance issue, but it's annoying nevertheless. On many websites, I can't seem to get a decent printout. For example, my local paper has a searchable obituaries page, and

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/11/11 4:10 AM, Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: And i don't undertand why a browser can display a page correctly and was unable to "copy" this into a piece of paper... I'm with you on this, Ray, and I've got no idea why, if SeaMonkey has t

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Daniel
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Daniel wrote: Paul, does spoofing your SeaMonkey as FF or IE help the situation?? Dunno, have never tried. How to? Paul, when I examine the header of my message, I can see:- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1

Re: Print issue in SM

2011-02-13 Thread Daniel
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Daniel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Daniel wrote: RebootJob done. Reboot Windows? Not necessary; just close and restart the browser. Would you believe...I thought that was the case but figured no harm done to re-boot. Actually, restart