Re: weatherspark.com stopped working with 2.0.14

2011-05-29 Thread Barry Edwin Gilmour
NoOp wrote: On 05/28/2011 10:04 AM, d...@kd4e.com wrote: Setup: Seamonkey 2.0.14 Linux Shockwave Flash 10.2 d151 This page was working fine then suddenly stopped: http://weatherspark.com/#!graphs;q=Statesboro,+Georgia,+United+States I made no changes here since yesterday. Might

Re: Auto complete for form filling

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel
Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: Jens Hatlak wrote: Daniel wrote: SeaMonkey Version 1.x.x did have an auto-fill function, but the re-write of the program for Version 2.x.x dis-abled this ability, but there were/are extensions that sort of did it. I think the soon-to-be-released Version 2.1

Re: Can't view images

2011-05-29 Thread Daniel
Monica wrote: Suddenly I can't view graphics (images) in emails and on some websites. What could have gone wrong? I'll appreciate any help in this matter! Monica Monica, I cannot help with your email situation, but if you were only having problems with some images, I would be looking at

Re: weatherspark.com stopped working with 2.0.14

2011-05-29 Thread d...@kd4e.com
It is working again here, so either they were in maintenance-mode or they fixed their code. -- Thanks! 73, KD4E David Colburn http://kd4e.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day I don't google I SEARCH! STARTPAGE.com Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html

Re: weatherspark.com stopped working with 2.0.14

2011-05-29 Thread Joe Rotello
Re: weatherspark.com stopped working with 2.0.14 Although one is also speaking of Linux IO believe... Might have something to do with the fact that that whole site is still in Beta test, although just to note, it was or is seemingly working properly with Windows XP, Win 7 32/64bit, MS IE,

Yahoo email upgrade - possible problem with SeaMonkey?

2011-05-29 Thread John
I received this message from Yahoo! == Yahoo! Mail is upgrading: What it means for you. Thank you for being a Yahoo! Mail user for the past 10 year(s). We look forward to bringing you an even faster, safer, easier-to-use Yahoo!

Re: Yahoo email upgrade - possible problem with SeaMonkey?

2011-05-29 Thread WLS
John wrote: I received this message from Yahoo! == Yahoo! Mail is upgrading: What it means for you. Thank you for being a Yahoo! Mail user for the past 10 year(s). We look forward to bringing you an even faster, safer,

Re: Yahoo email upgrade - possible problem with SeaMonkey?

2011-05-29 Thread Paul
John wrote: I received this message from Yahoo! == Yahoo! Mail is upgrading: What it means for you. Thank you for being a Yahoo! Mail user for the past 10 year(s). We look forward to bringing you an even faster, safer,

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread WLS
Philip Chee wrote: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread Stefan Sitter
WLS wrote: Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads normally. I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA instead of the full

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread WLS
Stefan Sitter wrote: WLS wrote: Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads normally. I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA

Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jane_Galt
I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? -- - Jane Galt Without America there is no Free World. The reason that Progressivism-Socialism-Communism always fail, is that you

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 11:21 AM, Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? On your SeaMonkey menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey]. In the last (5th) bullet in the

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Robert Kaiser
Jane_Galt schrieb: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? Might just be the time to switch to SeaMonkey 2.1 instead, which 98% of those sites magically support. Robert

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Robert Kaiser wrote: Jane_Galt schrieb: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? Might just be the time to switch to SeaMonkey 2.1 instead, which 98% of those sites magically

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Robert Kaiser
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with just minor adjustments to be made still. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread W3BNR
On 5/29/2011 3:41 PM Robert Kaiser submitted the following: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with just minor

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Robert Kaiser wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with just minor adjustments to be made still. I see. I

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Rick Merrill
W3BNR wrote: On 5/29/2011 3:41 PM Robert Kaiser submitted the following: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread JeffM
Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. When you encounter idiots who don't know how to build a website properly, you have options: 1) Avoid the idiots permanently 2) Complain to the idiots that they

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Rick Merrill wrote: W3BNR wrote: On 5/29/2011 3:41 PM Robert Kaiser submitted the following: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
JeffM wrote: Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. When you encounter idiots who don't know how to build a website properly, you have options: 1) Avoid the idiots permanently 2) Complain to the

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jan_Galt
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote : On 5/29/11 11:21 AM, Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? On your SeaMonkey menu bar, select [Help

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jan_Galt
JeffM jef...@email.com wrote : Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. When you encounter idiots who don't know how to build a website properly, you have options: 1) Avoid the idiots permanently

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jan_Galt
Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote : Jane_Galt schrieb: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? Might just be the time to switch to SeaMonkey 2.1 instead, which 98% of

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Jan_Galt wrote: You consider Google, one of the biggest sites in the world, to be idiots? Size is no measure of intelligence. Some of the biggest people I know are idiots. For that matter, some of the smallest ones are idiots, too. It cuts across all demographics. -- War doesn't determine

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 29/05/2011 16:41, Robert Kaiser told the world: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: For those few sites too stupid to sniff for Gecko, why not just lie to them and spoof FF? That's what 2.1 does. And it's not beta any more, it's RC, which means it's as good as release, with

Re: Yahoo email upgrade - possible problem with SeaMonkey?

2011-05-29 Thread NoOp
On 05/29/2011 08:48 AM, WLS wrote: John wrote: ... I know SeaMonkey is based on Firefox, but I've encountered some websites which work with Firefox but don't recognize SeaMonkey as a valid browser. If this Yahoo email upgrade doesn't work with SeaMonkey, I will not be a happy camper. I

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote : [...]idiots who don't know how to build a website properly[...] Jan_Galt wrote: You consider Google, one of the biggest sites in the world, to be idiots? Yup. This topic has been covered in this group innumerable times. YOU DON'T NEED TO SNIFF FOR BROWSERS. Just make your stupid

SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

2011-05-29 Thread Paul Bergsagel
I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC. It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot I relaunched SeaMonkey and all my previous

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread NoOp
On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web server was Lightning 1.0b4pre! Thanks for catching this error. I filed Bug 660522.

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread WLS
Jan_Galt wrote: Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote : Jane_Galt schrieb: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? Might just be the time to switch to SeaMonkey 2.1 instead,

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web server was Lightning 1.0b4pre! Thanks for

Re: Browser History

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/15/11 8:01 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: The user interface to control the browser history has been removed from SeaMonkey 2.1RC1. Do any of the following preference variables still have any effect on controlling the history? No. We have been talking bout this

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 4:04 PM, Jan_Galt wrote: David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote : On 5/29/11 11:21 AM, Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? On your

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 4:08 PM, Jan_Galt wrote: JeffM jef...@email.com wrote : Jane_Galt wrote: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. When you encounter idiots who don't know how to build a website properly, you have

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 6:35 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC. It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jan_Galt
WLS wls15...@yahooremove.com wrote : Jan_Galt wrote: Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote : Jane_Galt schrieb: I keep getting messages from Google search, Adwords and other places that my browser ( SM ) is no longer supported. Is it time to switch from Seamonkey to FF? Might just be the

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread Jan_Galt
David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote : No, I was not asking for build:config. I want the user agent (UA) string that follows Build identifier when you select [Help About SeaMonkey] on the menu bar. No build identifier on mine. That's why I sent the other. -- - Jane Galt Without

Re: Clicking on Share button in YouTube videos go to blank web page and get stuck in reading ssl.gstatic.com server.

2011-05-29 Thread Ant
On 5/28/2011 8:48 AM PT, Ant typed: I noticed this started a few days ago when logged into YouTube.com and trying to share its videos to gets its embedded videos. It seems like it doesn't detect SeaMonkey v2.0.14 correctly since using Firefox v3.6.8 user agent (and even changing back to real

[RSS] Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-29 Thread NoOp
On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web

Re: Browser History

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 7:32 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 5/15/11 8:01 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: The user interface to control the browser history has been removed from SeaMonkey 2.1RC1. Do any of the following preference variables still have any effect on controlling the history?

Re: Browser no longer supported

2011-05-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 5/29/11 8:22 PM, Jan_Galt wrote: David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid wrote : No, I was not asking for build:config. I want the user agent (UA) string that follows Build identifier when you select [Help About SeaMonkey] on the menu bar. No build identifier on mine. That's why I