Re: AllState Web Site

2011-10-09 Thread David E. Ross
On 10/8/11 1:15 PM, sean nathan bean wrote: Daniel sent me the following:: sean nathan bean wrote: Daniel sent me the following:: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Ant wrote: Snip I don't know where the advertise FireFox compatability switch is. Edit-Preferences-Advanced-HTTP Networking.

Resource consumption comaprison

2011-10-09 Thread jim
win xp sp2 I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual. Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The least resource intensive? 1. Seamonkey (2.2) 2. Firefox (7.2) 3. IE8 4. Google Chrome (latest version, 10/11) 5.

Re: Can Google-Analytics be bypassed?

2011-10-09 Thread Daniel
sean nathan bean wrote: Daniel sent me the following:: sean nathan bean wrote: d...@kd4e.com sent me the following:: Just getting back to this ... Is the file to which this is added /etc/hosts ? Is everything in there blocked? Thanks! Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: # block google ads.

Re: AllState Web Site

2011-10-09 Thread Daniel
sean Nathan bean wrote: Daniel sent me the following:: sean nathan bean wrote: Daniel sent me the following:: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Ant wrote: Snip I don't know where the advertise FireFox compatability switch is. Edit-Preferences-Advanced-HTTP Networking. HTH sorta useless

Re: Resource consumption comaprison

2011-10-09 Thread Daniel
jim wrote: win xp sp2 I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual. Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The least resource intensive? 1. Seamonkey (2.2) 2. Firefox (7.2) 3. IE8 4. Google Chrome (latest version,

Re: Resource consumption comaprison

2011-10-09 Thread WLS
jim wrote: win xp sp2 I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual. Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The least resource intensive? 1. Seamonkey (2.2) 2. Firefox (7.2) 3. IE8 4. Google Chrome (latest version,

Re: Towards an alternative way forward for Seamonkey

2011-10-09 Thread Keith Whaley
Excellent analogy, Sir Phillip! :-) Pertinent, accurate and most amusing all at the same time. Thanks, keith whaley Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: MCBastos wrote: To draw a very simple parallel, there's very little haste and stress involved in getting on the subway to travel

Re: changing folder sequence

2011-10-09 Thread Keith Whaley
Keith Whaley wrote: MCBastos wrote: On 08/10/2011 20:53, Keith Whaley told the world: I have several folders under my Inbox folder. Since I upgraded from 2.0.14, to 2.4.1, some of my folders have changed position. I don't like that. I want to switch them back to the old order. Who can tell me

Re: Resource consumption comaprison

2011-10-09 Thread Paul
jim wrote: win xp sp2 I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual. Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The least resource intensive? 1. Seamonkey (2.2) 2. Firefox (7.2) 3. IE8 4. Google Chrome (latest version,

upgrading seamonket 1.1.19

2011-10-09 Thread Joseph Farruggio
Joe wrote: Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for your help ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Resource consumption comaprison

2011-10-09 Thread Robert Kaiser
jim schrieb: 1. Seamonkey (2.2) 2. Firefox (7.2) 3. IE8 4. Google Chrome (latest version, 10/11) 5. (Other you find pertinent to mention?) None of those are the latest versions, so comparing those versions isn't that useful - but at least IE8 is right in that it's the latest for XP.

Re: upgrading seamonket 1.1.19

2011-10-09 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 09/10/2011 18:07, Joseph Farruggio told the world: Joe wrote: Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for your help I don't think this is recommended. The best procedure would be to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.0.x first, and then go to 2.4.1. --

Relocating Profiles

2011-10-09 Thread rob
Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP? Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile and create a new profile in the new location? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: upgrading seamonket 1.1.19

2011-10-09 Thread Paul Bergsagel
Joseph Farruggio wrote: Joe wrote: Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for your help Since several users have reported that they have lost bookmarks or mail after an upgrade it is important and wise that you perform a full backup of your profile folder before you

Re: upgrading seamonket 1.1.19

2011-10-09 Thread Ray Davison
Joseph Farruggio wrote: Joe wrote: Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Yes. Create a copy of your 1119 profile with a name you will know as SM 2X after sql. Then tell 2.4.1 to use that profile and it will update it as necessary. Ray

Re: Relocating Profiles

2011-10-09 Thread WLS
rob wrote: Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP? Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile and create a new profile in the new location? You probably can, but you might accomplish it easier with the standalone profile manager.

Re: Relocating Profiles

2011-10-09 Thread rob
On 10/9/2011 8:48 PM, WLS wrote: rob wrote: Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP? Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile and create a new profile in the new location? You probably can, but you might accomplish it easier with the

Re: Relocating Profiles

2011-10-09 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:21:31 -0500, rob wrote: Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP? Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile and create a new profile in the new location? You can relocate your profile(s). What you can't do is to