On 10/8/11 1:15 PM, sean nathan bean wrote:
Daniel sent me the following::
sean nathan bean wrote:
Daniel sent me the following::
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Ant wrote:
Snip
I don't know where the advertise FireFox compatability switch
is.
Edit-Preferences-Advanced-HTTP Networking.
win xp sp2
I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual.
Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The
least resource intensive?
1. Seamonkey (2.2)
2. Firefox (7.2)
3. IE8
4. Google Chrome (latest version, 10/11)
5.
sean nathan bean wrote:
Daniel sent me the following::
sean nathan bean wrote:
d...@kd4e.com sent me the following::
Just getting back to this ...
Is the file to which this is added /etc/hosts ?
Is everything in there blocked?
Thanks!
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
# block google ads.
sean Nathan bean wrote:
Daniel sent me the following::
sean nathan bean wrote:
Daniel sent me the following::
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Ant wrote:
Snip
I don't know where the advertise FireFox compatability switch
is.
Edit-Preferences-Advanced-HTTP Networking.
HTH
sorta useless
jim wrote:
win xp sp2
I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual.
Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The
least resource intensive?
1. Seamonkey (2.2)
2. Firefox (7.2)
3. IE8
4. Google Chrome (latest version,
jim wrote:
win xp sp2
I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual.
Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The
least resource intensive?
1. Seamonkey (2.2)
2. Firefox (7.2)
3. IE8
4. Google Chrome (latest version,
Excellent analogy, Sir Phillip! :-)
Pertinent, accurate and most amusing all at the same time.
Thanks,
keith whaley
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
To draw a very simple parallel, there's very little haste and stress
involved in getting on the subway to travel
Keith Whaley wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
On 08/10/2011 20:53, Keith Whaley told the world:
I have several folders under my Inbox folder.
Since I upgraded from 2.0.14, to 2.4.1, some of my folders have changed
position. I don't like that.
I want to switch them back to the old order.
Who can tell me
jim wrote:
win xp sp2
I normally run two browsers. I doubt that this is unusual.
Between the following, which do you find the most resource intensive? The
least resource intensive?
1. Seamonkey (2.2)
2. Firefox (7.2)
3. IE8
4. Google Chrome (latest version,
Joe wrote:
Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for
your help
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
jim schrieb:
1. Seamonkey (2.2)
2. Firefox (7.2)
3. IE8
4. Google Chrome (latest version, 10/11)
5. (Other you find pertinent to mention?)
None of those are the latest versions, so comparing those versions isn't
that useful - but at least IE8 is right in that it's the latest for XP.
Interviewed by CNN on 09/10/2011 18:07, Joseph Farruggio told the world:
Joe wrote:
Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for
your help
I don't think this is recommended. The best procedure would be to
upgrade to Seamonkey 2.0.x first, and then go to 2.4.1.
--
Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP?
Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile
and create a new profile in the new location?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Joseph Farruggio wrote:
Joe wrote:
Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1. Thanks for
your help
Since several users have reported that they have lost bookmarks or mail
after an upgrade it is important and wise that you perform a full backup
of your profile folder before you
Joseph Farruggio wrote:
Joe wrote:
Can i go directly from seamonkey 1.1.19 to SEamonkey 2.4.1.
Yes. Create a copy of your 1119 profile with a name you will know as SM
2X after sql. Then tell 2.4.1 to use that profile and it will update it
as necessary.
Ray
rob wrote:
Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP?
Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile
and create a new profile in the new location?
You probably can, but you might accomplish it easier with the standalone
profile manager.
On 10/9/2011 8:48 PM, WLS wrote:
rob wrote:
Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP?
Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile
and create a new profile in the new location?
You probably can, but you might accomplish it easier with the
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:21:31 -0500, rob wrote:
Is it possible to relocate Sea Monkey Profiles on Windows XP?
Can I simply copy the profile to an new location, delete the old profile
and create a new profile in the new location?
You can relocate your profile(s). What you can't do is to
18 matches
Mail list logo