Re: Another flash block question, SM 2.26.1

2015-03-29 Thread David E. Ross
On 3/29/2015 4:40 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is another flash block needed when there is already one built into SM? The Flashblock extension will show you where the Flash presentation would have appeared if it were not blocked. This is indicated by an icon that is an Italic lower-case f

Re: Another flash block question, SM 2.26.1

2015-03-29 Thread Paul in Houston, TX
David E. Ross wrote: On 3/29/2015 4:40 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is another flash block needed when there is already one built into SM? The Flashblock extension will show you where the Flash presentation would have appeared if it were not blocked. This is indicated by an icon that is

Re: Another flash block question, SM 2.26.1

2015-03-29 Thread Paul in Houston, TX
Lemon Juice wrote: On 2015-03-30 01:40, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is another flash block needed when there is already one built into SM? It's not needed if the built-in one does what you need. Flash block extensions may have other features like site white-listing or blocking html5 video.

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread Cruz, Jaime
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 03:11 PM, EE wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread Paul Marwick
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread WaltS48
On 03/29/2015 12:03 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on

PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread Paul Marwick
I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin - always had problems with it. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread WaltS48
On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin - always had

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread WaltS48
On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin - always had

Re: Why are functions being broken and not fixed ?

2015-03-29 Thread Daniel
On 29/03/15 03:34, NFN Smith wrote: WaltS48 wrote: Would it be better not to touch that part of the code then ? Would it be better to perform regression testing ? Or a broken feature is not high priority ? Who knows ? The Gecko code gets changed by paid Mozilla developers and volunteers for

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread EE
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread EE
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin

Re: flashblock for SM 2.26.1 ??

2015-03-29 Thread EE
Lemon Juice wrote: On 2015-03-28 19:11, EE wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend? There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work properly.

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread WaltS48
On 03/29/2015 03:11 PM, EE wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread WaltS48
On 03/29/2015 03:09 PM, EE wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm

Re: flashblock for SM 2.26.1 ??

2015-03-29 Thread Lemon Juice
On 2015-03-29 21:20, EE wrote: Lemon Juice wrote: On 2015-03-28 19:11, EE wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is there a SM flash block that allows selective turn on similar to FF flashblock plugin? Which do you recommend? There is a version which had to be patched 3 times in order to work

Another flash block question, SM 2.26.1

2015-03-29 Thread Paul in Houston, TX
Is another flash block needed when there is already one built into SM? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Another flash block question, SM 2.26.1

2015-03-29 Thread Lemon Juice
On 2015-03-30 01:40, Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Is another flash block needed when there is already one built into SM? It's not needed if the built-in one does what you need. Flash block extensions may have other features like site white-listing or blocking html5 video.

Re: PDF viewer 1.0.277

2015-03-29 Thread Cruz, Jaime
WaltS48 wrote: On 03/29/2015 11:32 AM, Paul Marwick wrote: I've been using the PDF viewer (v1.0.277) for a while. Worked pretty well. With Seamonkey 2.33.1 (possibly also with 2.33) it no longer works. Is there another alternative, or an update anywhere? I'm not keen on adding the adobe plugin