Frank-Rainer Grahl composed on 2016-09-10 00:03 (UTC+0200):
In the mean time if you need a new release grab 2.45 from Adrian if you
are on Windows or Linux. His releases are build from the original
sources and bug reports against them are accepted:
Last I tried a version newer than 2.42 I
If I want to try a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey, will it install over the
32 bit version or will it be a separate install that I will have to
import everything (profile info, data, mail, bookmarks etc.) into?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 09/09/16 6:03 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400):
>>
>>> I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko
>>> 45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up
>>> to date with the
On 9/8/2016 10:04 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 9/8/2016 6:58 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 9/8/2016 4:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
>>> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101
>>> Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
>>> Build identifier: 20160120202951
>>> (but also occurs in SeaMonkey/2.40 linux
Paul Bergsagel wrote on 09/09/2016 02:43:
Some of the changes to Gecko are not compatible with Seamonkey. Our
Seamonkey programmers do amazing work adapting/reverting Gecko changes
made by FireFox programmers so that Seamonky and NOT some offshoot
clone of Firefox.I praise the SeaMonkey
Felix Miata wrote:
WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400):
I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko
45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up
to date with the Firefox ESR security and stability releases. I think
that would
Edmund Wong wrote:
Stephan Thiele wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
almost half a year ago.
No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question.
I am quite
On 9/9/2016 at 12:59 PM, Mozillian's prodigious digits fired off:
And worse ! when the auto update is enabled, Seamonkey goes to "Not
responding" when it is checking and hangs all other operations including
creating a new post.
Wow -Seamonkey programmers need help.
Not having any such issues
WaltS48 composed on 2016-09-09 09:22 (UTC-0400):
I think the SeaMonkey developers should base the next version on Gecko
45 ESR (which would have been SM 2.42), call it SM 2.45 and bring it up
to date with the Firefox ESR security and stability releases. I think
that would make it currently SM
And worse ! when the auto update is enabled, Seamonkey goes to "Not
responding" when it is checking and hangs all other operations including
creating a new post.
Wow -Seamonkey programmers need help.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Elevating this anomaly.
I have all providers set for Seamonkey to update newsgroup posts on
startup and every ten minutes.
It does not update !
I have to click on a newsgroup to get it to update.
That means I have to fiddle when I should just have to glance to see if
anything new is
On 09/09/2016 03:01 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Edmund,
A good explanation.
So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that
aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a
reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal
interface that
Ken wrote:
I access a website to program my DVR and should I decide to record a
program I click on a program listed. That causes a window (pop up) to
overlay the TV listings with choices such as "More options." The
problem is the pop up is not completely visible and all the options
cannot be
Edmund Wong wrote:
Edmund,
A good explanation.
So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that
aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a
reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal
interface that would be simpler to
>
> Edmund,
>
> A good explanation.
>
> So, here's my question: Are there any Gecko alternatives out there that
> aren't changing at a such a furious rate? Something to give us a
> reasonable (and safe) SM but perhaps with a more consistent internal
> interface that would be simpler to
Edmund Wong wrote:
Stephan Thiele wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
almost half a year ago.
No. Not a stupid question at all. In fact, it's a very good question.
I am quite
16 matches
Mail list logo
