Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545 (Default Classic
Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
Stephan Thiele wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
almost half a year ago.
I am quite confused that there a nightlies with version numbers
increasing to 2.48 while there is not even a beta
On 12/10/2016, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
> unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545 (Default Classic
> Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal Us
Hi,
on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1 (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545 (Default Classic
Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
replaces "http" in URL by
On 10/11/2016 07:23 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 4:42 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
>> On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
>>> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the
>>> system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those
>>> that are still running 2.40). Here
On 10/11/2016 4:42 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the
>> system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those
>> that are still running 2.40). Here is what I get for the upgraded 2.46:
>>
On 10/11/2016 07:10 PM, NoOp wrote:
I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the
system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those
that are still running 2.40). Here is what I get for the upgraded 2.46:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.
I just received update notices for 2.46 (Windows and linux) on the
system that I have 2.46 running. (Note: I do not get a notice on those
that are still running 2.40). Here is what I get for the upgraded 2.46:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonk
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, on 11 Oct 16 17:30:
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
A happy coincidence that you decided to do so, since I already had
the intention of writing you, to ask for details about your migration
of SM from XP to W7 -- but let's leave that for a little later,
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, on 11 Oct 16 18:52:
... the main point would be that SM seems to open or show messages
using the 'last-used' text encoding, not the one specified in the
e-mail's properties (which, IMHO, should be considered a bug).
I agree this doesn't seem right.
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, on 11 Oct 16 17:14:
That also affects opening previously saved drafts. So, for example:
- Start composing a message with UTF-8 encoding (like Paul, that's my
default) and include a character not covered by the standard ASCII set
(in my case, usually "
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, on 10 Oct 16 15:48:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have noticed that sometimes SM will guess wrong when I select a
message in a mail folder, but if I navigate away and then return it'll
guess right. I don't know why that is -
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
BTW, before I forget: It's been a few years since SM started opening
that 'message pane' when you classify a message as "Junk"; it wasn't
that way earlier, and I don't see any way to turn that behavior off!
Does anyone know some way to do that?
That one looks like b
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, on 10 out 16 17:49:
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
A happy coincidence that you decided to do so, since I already had
the intention of writing you, to ask for details about your migration
of SM from XP to W7 -- but let's leave that for a littl
Ray_Net wrote:
What happens about a possible solution for :
"View Selection Source Fails in SeaMonkey 2.40"
I had a very bad idea coming from 2.38 to 2.40 :-(
Now I am at:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
That is fixed in SeaMonkey 2
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have noticed that sometimes SM will guess wrong when I select a
message in a mail folder, but if I navigate away and then return it'll
guess right. I don't know why that is -- it seems to be sticki
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, on 11 Oct 16 04:10:
If I were only getting 20 messages a day, I might try your way. As it
happens, I routinely get over a hundred, sometimes 200, so filtering to
appropriate folders is a great time saver. If messages 3, 28, 47, and 96
relate to the same topic, it's much
SamuelS wrote on 11/10/2016 01:20:
Ray_Net wrote:
SamuelS wrote on 09/10/2016 14:04:
SamuelS wrote:
Hello all, just received my new system, suffice it to say the
company that made it for me, did what they wanted to do and not
what I requested...
I had my SM program on W10 pro on drive e: I
Alexander Yudenitsch wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, on 11 Oct 16 00:35:
In the same way, I do want SM to move junk messages to the Junk
folder, which then lights up in bold to remind me to check them. In
most cases, I can take one look at the subject line and agree that
it's junk -- if I've j
19 matches
Mail list logo