Re: Rebuilding SM Mail after a PC Failure

Henrik37 wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Henrik37 wrote: ... I would like to recover my 'collected addresses' (which I think is the address book) but I don't know what that file(s) named. No, "collected addresses" is not /the/ address book. It's /an/ address book that contains email

Re: Rebuilding SM Mail after a PC Failure

Henrik37 composed on 2016-12-09 16:58 (UTC-0500): I would like to recover my 'collected addresses' (which I think is the address book) but I don't know what that file(s) named. Looking at the new SM 2.4 installation file listing, it would appear that the address files are shared by all of the

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote: On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote: 1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo. That also happens in SM 2.47 (64 bit). Build

Re: Thanksgiving...

sean wrote: > As I continue setting up access to my 12 e'mail accounts via Seamonkey > 2.49a2, I want to express my thanks and gratitude to all the > developers who spend their free time helping to keep Seamonkey moving > ahead... > > I've loved Seamonkey for a very long time, ever so grateful to

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Ralph Fox wrote: Even if the recipient does have Wingdings, the recipient can still see a "J" like the OP did. * The Unicode value for "J" is 74 (U+004A). * But the Wingdings font's smiley face has a different _Unicode_ value 61514 (U+F04A) in the Wingdings font's cmap. A program

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Richmond wrote: "Paul B. Gallagher" writes: True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a reasonable thing for an

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 17:56:59 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Richmond wrote: > >> You cannot do that if you don't have the Microsoft Wingdings font >> (because you aren't using Microsoft). The OP is running Windows 7. It is highly likely that the OP does have the Wingdings font installed.

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

"Paul B. Gallagher" writes: > True enough. But there are hundreds of sites where you can download > and install Wingdings for free. It's not hard. And given the > prevalence of Windows and the popularity of Wingdings, it's a > reasonable thing for an end user to

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Richmond wrote: "Paul B. Gallagher" writes: In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as it's told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point. That wouldn't be

Re: Rebuilding SM Mail after a PC Failure

Henrik37 wrote: I am in the process of rebuilding my SM mail system on a new PC after an unexpected major failure of an old PC. The failed PC ran SM 2.39. The new PC has SM 2.40 installed but is not yet in use. Using the command prompt, I have managed to copy the 'inbox' and 'sent' files for

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

"Paul B. Gallagher" writes: > > In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font > Wingdings and sends the character "J," SeaMonkey should do as it's > told and display the Wingdings glyph for that character point. That > wouldn't be a

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote on 09-12-16 22:16: David E. Ross wrote: It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to render 0x004A as anything other than J. In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

On 09/12/2016 20:10, EE wrote: > If I search in my URL bar, I get whatever engine is selected in the > searchbar. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Patch fixing mnenhy

On 09/12/2016 20:57, John Duncan wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> It is likely that the original author has stopped working on that >> add-on. However, someone else picked up the ball: >> >> https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26256#c2 >> https://bitbucket.org/stanio/mnenhy/downloads >> >>

Rebuilding SM Mail after a PC Failure

I am in the process of rebuilding my SM mail system on a new PC after an unexpected major failure of an old PC. The failed PC ran SM 2.39. The new PC has SM 2.40 installed but is not yet in use. Using the command prompt, I have managed to copy the 'inbox' and 'sent' files for all six of my

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

David E. Ross wrote: It would be definitely wrong -- a major deviation from the commitment to adhere to standards -- for any Mozilla-based application to render 0x004A as anything other than J. In an HTML page (or an HTML email), if the sender specifies the font Wingdings and sends the

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

On 12/9/2016 7:50 AM, Ray_Net wrote: > Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03: >> "David E. Ross" writes: >> >>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent >>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is >> But while we are

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

Mason83 wrote: On 22/11/2016 15:54, TCW wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:08:09 +0100, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:50, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:47, Mason83 wrote: On 20/11/2016 20:44, Mason83 wrote: 2) When I display an email or NG message, the header pane was empty. Removing the

Re: akalla version 2.46 issues

Mason83 wrote: On 08/12/2016 20:11, EE wrote: Mr. Ed wrote: On 12/07/16 3:32 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 21:16, Mr. Ed wrote: On 11/20/16 2:44 PM, Mason83 wrote: 1) I was using the StartPage search engine for searches done directly in the location bar. It now goes to duckduckgo.

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/8/2016 10:57 AM, EE wrote: Is there ever going to be a new candidate for Mac OS? The current candidate dated Oct. 5 caused a problem with a website I visit frequently. Stick with the existing, official, end-user version 2.40. Anything beyond that is either still

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Ray_Net writes: > Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03: >> "David E. Ross" writes: >> >>> I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent >>> messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is >> But

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

If a release candidate works it will not be much different from the official build. Just back up your profile and try it out. 2.46 is miles ahead of 2.40. Any errors you see in a candidate will be in the final build and the sooner they are reported the sooner they are fixed. FRG David E.

Re: SM update status...

On 09/12/2016 15:31, David H. Durgee wrote: > Mason83 wrote: > >> One thing to watch out for is when Ubuntuzilla eventually >> puts out a new release. This is likely to overwrite your >> "custom" SM package. I don't have a good solution for that. > > Interesting you should mention that. When I

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Richmond wrote on 09-12-16 11:03: "David E. Ross" writes: I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be pragmatic.

Re: SM update status...

Mason83 wrote: On 09/12/2016 02:17, David H. Durgee wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 23:12, David H. Durgee wrote: Mason83 wrote: On 06/12/2016 15:01, David H. Durgee wrote: I am currently running 2.40 x64 on linux mint x64 installed from the ubuntuzilla repository. I have a local

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

On 9/12/2016 6:37 AM, Mason83 wrote: On 08/12/2016 13:09, TCW wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:14:55 +0800, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi, Fwiw.. please *do* note that those 2.46 candidate builds are just test builds. While it does have the sec fix, it isn't the official candidate until I start

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Ant writes: > Thanks, but it didn't work for me. I tried > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/smiley-fixer/versions/ and > force an install with its reboot. It didn't work. :( Did it work for anyone > else in SM v2.40? It seems to work for me with Aurora, I have

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

"David E. Ross" writes: > > I assert that it is the sender's reponsibility to ensure that sent > messages can be correctly viewed by the intended recipients. This is But while we are waiting for the ideal world, we have to be pragmatic. Senders with MS Office don't know

Re: "J" instead of Outlook's happy face?

Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid> writes: > You must set the font for the J or L to be Wingdings, which means the > message may need to be HTML. > My SM doesn't let me select Wingdings in the HTML compose window.  > But I can insert the required HTML code using "Insert >> HTML...". > > HTML

Re: no plugins with current SM version

On 09/12/2016 08:21, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Plugin support is discontined in Gecko / Firefox 52 which is the base of > SeaMonkey. This was alrweady the case with 64 bit Windows versions for > some time. Only Flash will work. All other plugings will no longer work. > Nothing we / SeaMonkey