Re: youtube.com main page not showing video thumbnails

2010-11-06 Thread Oliver Naumann
NoOp wrote: On 11/05/2010 02:45 AM, Arne wrote: Oliver Naumann wrote: [1]https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/762688 Don't work for me. I have DOM storage enabled (was never disabled). Ditto. dom.storage.enabled on a clean FF install is 'true'. Same for SM 2.1b2pre, and I tested

Re: youtube.com main page not showing video thumbnails

2010-11-04 Thread Oliver Naumann
NoOp wrote: On both SeaMonkey Firefox (3.6.12): Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.10 and Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 When I visit

Re: youtube.com main page not showing video thumbnails

2010-11-04 Thread Oliver Naumann
NoOp wrote: On both SeaMonkey Firefox (3.6.12): When I visit http://www.youtube.com/ none of the video thumbnails show. Solution: YouTube stops working if you have DOM storage disabled.[1] Maybe the default changed with recent updates or something? [1]

Re: SM2.1: Workaround for remote timestamp on downloads?

2010-03-19 Thread Oliver Naumann
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:37:06 +0100, /Oliver Naumann/: As proposed in bug 178506, downloaded files are now assigned the last-modified timestamp from the remote server. Nevermind. Luckily, this was really easy to fix with an extension. It would help if you provide

Re: SM2.1: Workaround for remote timestamp on downloads?

2010-03-18 Thread Oliver Naumann
Oliver Naumann wrote: As proposed in bug 178506, downloaded files are now assigned the last- modified timestamp from the remote server. Nevermind. Luckily, this was really easy to fix with an extension. Oliver ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: SM2.1: Workaround for remote timestamp on downloads?

2010-03-18 Thread Oliver Naumann
Bill Davidsen wrote: On Linux/Mac it's less critical, the accessed and changed dates can be used for sorting or searching. Well, this is possibile on Windows as well, at least with the modified and created timestamps. Still, I wouldn't feel stupid at all asking how a file can have been