On 06/10/2012 07:27 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
> Craig (+Jens),
>
> I've just replicated the same in Fedora 17. First I installed openjdk &
> tested with both Firefox(13) & SeaMonkey (2.10), and the result is
> exactly the same as the above tests (works/works). I then did the same
> with SeaMonkey 2.10,
On 06/07/2012 12:14 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Craig (+Jens),
> @Craig: I won't have fedora or openSUSE back up until later today. I'll
> try to test then.
>
> @Jens: I did a bit of experimenting this morning and discovered
> (Ubuntu/Debian) that Mozilla Firefox (not the distro version) uses
> mozilla-
NoOp wrote:
@Craig: I won't have fedora or openSUSE back up until later today. I'll
try to test then.
@Jens: I did a bit of experimenting this morning and discovered
(Ubuntu/Debian) that Mozilla Firefox (not the distro version) uses
mozilla-javaplugin.so only, whereas SeaMonkey (not the distro
Jens Hatlak wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Jens, while you're on the subject of Java... is there any way a [Win7]
SM user to whom all of this is "greek", get Java to work on SM 2.8 or
any subsequent version? :)
Java *is* working for *me*, and I'm on Win7 x64, SM 2.10b3 (which is 99.9%
equal to SM
Jens Hatlak wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Jens, while you're on the subject of Java... is there any way a [Win7]
SM user to whom all of this is "greek", get Java to work on SM 2.8 or
any subsequent version? :)
Java *is* working for *me*, and I'm on Win7 x64, SM 2.10b3 (which is
99.9% equal to SM
chicagofan wrote:
Jens, while you're on the subject of Java... is there any way a [Win7]
SM user to whom all of this is "greek", get Java to work on SM 2.8 or
any subsequent version? :)
Java *is* working for *me*, and I'm on Win7 x64, SM 2.10b3 (which is
99.9% equal to SM 2.10). Until a few
On 06/07/2012 12:16 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
> Craig wrote:
>> I read the bug, saw the command
>>
>> $ java -version
>>
>> so I tried it. My results are,
>>
>> $ java -version
>> java version "1.6.0_22"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
>> (rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
>> OpenJDK 64-
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Craig wrote:
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_22"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
Which is
Craig wrote:
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_22"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
Which is really odd, since
NoOp wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622
([linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 does not work in SeaMonkey)
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_22"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rh
NoOp wrote:
Use openjdk; SeaMonkey doesn't work with java 1.7.x:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622
([linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 does not work in SeaMonkey)
OK. But it seems odd that Firefox does work with java 1.7.x and
Seamonkey does not.
I'll look for openjdk and downl
On 06/06/2012 09:15 PM, Craig wrote:
> Seeing that Seamonkey 2.10 had been released, I downloaded it and
> Firefox 13.0. After I installed both, I started Seamonkey and went to
> the page http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/.
>
> At that page, I found my Java was out of date.
>
> I downloa
Seeing that Seamonkey 2.10 had been released, I downloaded it and
Firefox 13.0. After I installed both, I started Seamonkey and went to
the page http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/.
At that page, I found my Java was out of date.
I downloaded the new version (jre-7u4-linux-i586.rpm) and i
13 matches
Mail list logo
