Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-16 Thread Daniel
JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: Now for the $64,000 question: How much RAM is in that box? Daniel wrote: 375MByte 384MB would be the number commonly reported for that. So, your box is atypical for someone who is *still* using Win9x. Mostly such folks will never alter the original hardware specs

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel
JeffM wrote: JeffM wrote: A distro built around KDE or GNOME is likely a non-starter for gear of that vintage. Daniel wrote: Wrong!! My desktop is a dual boot Win98 (upgraded to SE, I think) and Mandriva Linux 2007.1. Part of the Mandrive install is KDE desktop. Version 3.x, but still KDE.

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-15 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote: Now for the $64,000 question: How much RAM is in that box? Daniel wrote: 375MByte 384MB would be the number commonly reported for that. So, your box is atypical for someone who is *still* using Win9x. Mostly such folks will never alter the original hardware specs and will still be

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-14 Thread Daniel
JeffM wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: I for myself am a big fan of openSUSE, which is very friendly to us You have to admire their taste in online software 8-) (though not as default browser...) Well, take the blessings as they come. [...]not so sure[...]how well it works for usually older

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-14 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote: A distro built around KDE or GNOME is likely a non-starter for gear of that vintage. Daniel wrote: Wrong!! My desktop is a dual boot Win98 (upgraded to SE, I think) and Mandriva Linux 2007.1. Part of the Mandrive install is KDE desktop. Version 3.x, but still KDE. Now for the

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread Robert Kaiser
baitman schrieb: Maybe I had ask the wrong question previous, on what was stable.. I am using version 1.19 with window 98se, what version can I go up too for example 2.07 will it run on windows 98se. We don't release current software for vastly outdated systems. If you want to stay with the

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread JeffM
baitman wrote: I am using version 1.19 with window 98se Robert Kaiser wrote: We don't release current software for vastly outdated systems. If you want to stay with the outdated vulnerability-prone Win98SE, you need to stick with the outdated vulnerability-prone 1.x versions of SeaMonkey as well.

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread Robert Kaiser
JeffM schrieb: [1] If you see Puppy mentioned, forget that as it is a poor choice with a lack of security similar to Win9x. OTOH, it's a distro that comes with SeaMonkey as the default browser and mail application, so I'd rather not diss them too much. :) Robert Kaiser -- Note that any

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread d...@kd4e.com
JeffM schrieb: [1] If you see Puppy mentioned, forget that as it is a poor choice with a lack of security similar to Win9x. OTOH, it's a distro that comes with SeaMonkey as the default browser and mail application, so I'd rather not diss them too much. :) Robert Kaiser The reference to

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote: If you see Puppy mentioned, forget that as it is a poor choice with a lack of security similar to Win9x. Robert Kaiser wrote: OTOH, it's a distro that comes with SeaMonkey as the default browser and mail application, 8-) Yup, *that* part is good. ...then again, the distro that I

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread d...@kd4e.com
JeffM wrote: If a newbie can do damage without any prompt that what he is doing is dangerous, he gets a fowl impression of Linux --because Puppy is a poor implementation of Linux. Again, with Puppy, it's too easy for a n00b to get a bad impression when one of the selling points of a proper Linux

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread Robert Kaiser
JeffM schrieb: ...then again, the distro that I like to point to for Win9x sufferers is also friendly to this community. Well, I for myself am a big fan of openSUSE, which is very friendly to us and shipping SeaMonkey on their default DVDs as well (though not as default browser, which is our

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread JeffM
Robert Kaiser wrote: I for myself am a big fan of openSUSE, which is very friendly to us You have to admire their taste in online software 8-) (though not as default browser...) Well, take the blessings as they come. [...]not so sure[...]how well it works for usually older hardware that

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-13 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote: If a newbie can do damage without any prompt that what he is doing is dangerous, he gets a fowl impression of Linux --because Puppy is a poor implementation of Linux. Again, with Puppy, it's too easy for a n00b to get a bad impression when one of the selling points of a proper Linux

Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-12 Thread baitman
Maybe I had ask the wrong question previous, on what was stable.. I am using version 1.19 with window 98se, what version can I go up too for example 2.07 will it run on windows 98se. I know all o/s has some problems.. Thanks again. Baitmn --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus

Re: Seamonkey 1.19

2010-09-12 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
baitman wrote: Maybe I had ask the wrong question previous, on what was stable.. I am using version 1.19 with window 98se, what version can I go up too for example 2.07 will it run on windows 98se. I know all o/s has some problems.. You will have to keep 1.1.19 as the series 2 won't run on