Bob Fleischer wrote:
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
Bob
SM 2.0
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Well, she can try installing Debian Linux, they should still support
PowerPC architectures and compile IceApe for it.
You should be able to compile Seamonkey from source for Linux/PPC too.
Peace... Sridhar
___
support-seamonkey
Bob Fleischer schrieb:
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
My ex-fir
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
I don't know, given what Microsoft, Ap
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
--
Thanks! & 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
Have an
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
Bob Fleischer wrote:
[...]Mac OS 10.4.
Apple: The new Borg.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?architect
Bob Fleischer wrote:
>[...]Mac OS 10.4.
>
Apple: The new Borg.
>I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
>and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
>
>Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
>
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?archite
Bob Fleischer schrieb:
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
None, nei
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
Bob
10 matches
Mail list logo