Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Daniel wrote:
All I'm seeing, on Ray's posts, is that sometimes he has just "Ray"
following the sig delimiter and in others nothing.
On several of Rays posts I see attached files with names like
"jafahdjc.jpg". Don't know what they're about.
On his most recent HTML p
Daniel wrote:
All I'm seeing, on Ray's posts, is that sometimes he has just "Ray"
following the sig delimiter and in others nothing.
On several of Rays posts I see attached files with names like
"jafahdjc.jpg". Don't know what they're about.
On his most recent HTML post in this thread (messag
Trane Francks wrote:
On 11/6/13 12:29 PM +0900, Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 11:18:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray
On 11/6/13 12:29 PM +0900, Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 11:18:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wr
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 11:18:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4
Title: My Signature
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 11:18:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 0
Daniel wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My off
Daniel wrote, On 05/11/2013 00:08:
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated
hawker wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 18:03:
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM,
On 11/4/2013 11:41 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course
hawker wrote, On 04/11/2013 16:16:
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated
On 11/1/2013 7:25 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail
On 11/2/2013, 6:35 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So that's what he's talking about!
Now all I need to know is what "+1" means.
If you really didn't know that, it's the same as "". Or in other
words, "Me too!";-)
OK, thanks.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 11/1/13 1:38 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
네?
Are you guys serious? T
Trane Francks wrote:
On 11/1/13 1:38 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
네?
Are you guys serious? Try opening the Mail & News
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So that's what he's talking about!
Now all I need to know is what "+1" means.
If you really didn't know that, it's the same as "". Or in other
words, "Me too!";-)
OK, thanks.
I've led a sheltered life, haven't frequented boa
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> So that's what he's talking about!
>
> Now all I need to know is what "+1" means.
If you really didn't know that, it's the same as "". Or in other
words, "Me too!";-)
--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high
_
Trane Francks wrote:
On 11/1/13 1:38 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
네?
Are you guys serious? Try opening the Mail & News
On 11/1/13 1:38 PM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
네?
Are you guys serious? Try opening the Mail & Newsgroups Account Settings
Title: My Signature
hawker wrote, On 01/11/2013 16:47:
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a
consistent signature line.
Of course those who made
On 10/31/2013 4:27 PM, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail client than I.
I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that pro
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
네?
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code,
"Signature editor"? What's that?...
+1
GW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listi
Trane Francks wrote:
The signature editor can handle full-on HTML code, so it's not
necessary to load from file. Linking graphics to a company web site
will work properly only when the mail is viewed with internet
connectivity, though.
"Signature editor"? What's that? Can't find any mention of
On 11/1/13 5:27 AM +0900, WaltS wrote:
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail client than I.
I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that
Interviewed by CNN on 31/10/2013 18:04, hawker told the world:
> My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
> Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
> different e-mail client than I.
>
> I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that profil
hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail client than I.
I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that profile.
Can someone tell me how I can do the following:
...
2
On 10/31/2013 04:04 PM, hawker wrote:
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail client than I.
I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that profile.
Can someone tell me how I can
My office has mandated we all have a consistent signature line.
Of course those who made the claim are on a Mac and using a totally
different e-mail client than I.
I have some HTML pasted in my signature line for that profile.
Can someone tell me how I can do the following:
1) Remove the -- th
32 matches
Mail list logo