Memory leaks
I use seamonkey 1.1.1 through a gecko's project on ATM. I have memory leaks, but I dont know if the cause is in my code or elsewhere. I built seamonkey with the followings options (On windows XP) mk_add_options MOZ_CO_PROJECT=suite ac_add_options --enable-application=suite mk_add_options moz_objd...@topsrcdir@/suite-opt ac_add_options --disable-optimize ac_add_options --enable-debug ac_add_options --enable-debugger-info-modules=yes ac_add_options --disable-mailnews ac_add_options --disable-ldap ac_add_options --disable-installer ac_add_options --disable-tests ac_add_options --enable-logging ac_add_options --enable-perf-metrics ac_add_options --disable-logrefcnt ac_add_options --enable-shark ac_add_options --enable-dtrace ac_add_options --enable-boehm ac_add_options --disable-trace-malloc ac_add_options --enable-detect-webshell-leaks ac_add_options --disable-strip I set the variables XPCOM_MEM_BLOAT_LOG=c:\membloat.log XPCOM_MEM_LEAK_LOG=c:\memleak.log XPCOM_MEM_LEAKY_LOG=c:\memleaky.log NSPR_LOG_MODULES=DOMLeak:5,DocumentLeak:5,nsDocShellLeak: 5,NodeInfoManagerLeak:5 NSPR_LOG_FILE=c:\nspr.log I got a nspr.log and a membloat.log Into membloat.log I see |Class---|-Bytes--| Objects|-- References--| Per-Inst Leaked Total Rem Mean StdDev Total Rem Mean StdDev 0 TOTAL46604 226079959 18 ( 143,84 +/- 155,01) 530852048 32 ( 72,74 +/- 120,68) 1 AtomImpl12 36 229957 3 ( 93,44 +/- 1,96) 48592083 ( 286,67 +/-25,19) 56 XPCNativeScriptableShared 108 108 828812 1 (8,50 +/- 0,50) 00 (0,00 +/- 0,00) 58 XPCWrappedNative 4848 11866431 ( 54,15 +/-14,52) 291953051 ( 59,97 +/-16,00) 85 nsBaseDragService 44 44 11 (1,00 +/- 0,00) 4294168 (9,00 +/- 1,08) 290 nsNativeDragTarget 24 192 1431378 (5,00 +/- 0,71) 715677 16 ( 15,40 +/- 1,78) 368 nsSupportsArray 52 52 9483371 ( 51,34 +/- 1,03) 23007021 ( 52,88 +/- 1,18) 379 nsThread24 24 6 1 (3,27 +/- 1,68) 26491401 ( 19,26 +/- 0,73) 380 nsTimerImpl48 48 157318 1 (5,03 +/- 0,96)6559111 ( 10,29 +/- 1,78) 417 nsXPCComponents 52 52 214711 1 ( 10,10 +/- 2,56) 17176881 ( 27,17 +/- 8,23) I didn't show the lines with leaked=0 Are these logs normal ? Is there a memory leak ? What can I do else, more logs .. thank's for your responses philippe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0
I agree with Mr. Barclay, but there is much to do and only so much free labor. So I limit my request to simply providing an option to turn off the I think you should send plain text, so I will convert it for you feature. /j Perhaps there's some lynx or links2 code that could be used in SeaMonkey to create thetextrendition of HTML messages. Daniel -- (Plaintextsometimes corrupted to HTML courtesy of Microsoft Exchange.) [F] ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Request for Seamonkey 2.0
Yes Lee, I can. But I'm a bit tired of having to do Options - Format - Send for -every- single email that I send. That's why I'm politely requesting the option disable auto- conversion to plain text. Thanks! 8-} /j Look in Send Format. You can make your preferred selection there. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Operation 2 for 1 - celebrating one year of Thunderbird bugday - day 1
Happy Birthday! Check out the chart on the birthday blog at http://quality.mozilla.org/story/one-year-thunderbird-bugdays To celebrate the first year of weekly bugdays for Thunderbird we are organizing a two day bugday (both on a Thursday) with a very special rule - *an incentive*. If you come and participate to the bug day and update at least two bugs we will assist you on one of your *mail-related* bugs (giving it triage love - trying to find a solution or a workaround for the bug). The first day will be running this Thursday, 2009-03-26! Now is the perfect time to join the Thunderbird QA team as Thunderbird 3.0 is approaching. You'll be participating in making sure that 3.0 becomes the best release of Thunderbird - *you'll feel that the program you use daily is a bit more yours*. The team has posted detailed instructions on what needs to be done, where to get help, and bugs that need attention at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:QA_TestDay:2009-03-26 and there is an Attend Event link at http://quality.mozilla.org/events/2009/mar/26/operation-2-1-celebrating-one-year-thunderbird-bugday-day-1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Email query
Leonidas Jones wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Broadback wrote: My computer broke, which necessitated a new one. Up and running ok, except when I read mail from all (10) mail boxes in one tranche I have this error: An error occurred with the POP3 mail server. Mail server mail x..co.uk responded: If I then press OK three times all is well. When I read each box individually there are no problem. any ideas please? An error occurred with the POP3 mail server. Mail server mail x..co.uk responded: . . . and what did the rest of the message say? Many times when this happens that is all the message says. Lee Indeed that was all it said, however the good news is that it has stopped happening, nothing I've done, one of life's mysteries I guess. Thanks for responses. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Part of window is overlayed.
JeffM wrote: 3) AFTER he had a standards-compliant page, if he wanted it to look right in IE, he would have **added** the needed tweaks for those using the LEAST-compliant browser. Daniel wrote: Sorry, Jeff, are you suggesting that MSIE cannot display a standards-compliant page?? Apparently, you've never heard of the Acid2 test: http://google.com/search?q=cache:AcSJyTwD0igJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2+c+2005.Safari+*-*-*-page-rendering-flaws-*-*-*+*-*-did-not-follow-*-standards+*-Explorer-8-on-*-*.*-*+c+a.test.page Internet Exploder 6 was a bad joke. Internet Exploder 7: different number; SAME bad joke. http://google.com/search?q=cache:fv22n-VduoEJ:www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/07/28/ie7_css_upda+Acid2.*-IE6.*-IE7+tv+tv+*-*-single-pixel-*-* Comparison of browsers from Summer 2006: (clickable links) http://google.com/search?q=cache:BcA9gIIu5uUJ:shane.rsbandb.com/tdb/page/4/?s=mage+using+Konqueror.3.5+Opera.9+Internet.Explorer.6+Internet.Explorer.7+Firefox.1.5+Safari.2+*-*-*.2006 Note from the previous Wiki link that Internet Exploder **8** FINALLY passed Acid2. (IE6 IE7 **never** will pass Acid2; see bad joke, above.) While M$ was farting around with Acid2, the other browsers (having long since hit that mark) moved on to Acid3. http://google.com/search?q=cache:b0vDW1amn3gJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3+c+Acid2+100/100+c+*-Explorer+c+*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-modern-highly-interactive-*strip=1 At one time a pre-release version of Internet Exploder 8 got 17 percent on Acid3. They just put a Release version of IE8 into the wild and that one gets 12 percent. The next-worse browser got 60 percent. Yes. Internet Exploder SUCKS at standards compliance. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sick windows machine
Lester Caine wrote: I've got Seamonkey on an XP(SP3) machine and it's running fine EXCEPT. It's not displaying some websites. Googel and ask come up fine, but when I select www.pctools.com it seems to be saying the domain does not exist, jet the same search and link works fine on the machine next door. There was a trojan on the machine which I've cleared out amd the disk is now fine, but trying to update the pctools anti virus fails, and following the link in seamonkey also fails. Seems to be 'selective amnesia' in relation to some IP addresses, but the firewall is off and I've even booted with all the start-up stuff disabled so all I'm running is seamonkey :( its not a problem with your computer or SeaMonkey, but rather your isp connection. Your isp DNS server is saying there's no such site, when there really is. I've run into this many, many times, and thats when I switched dns servers and things are far better now. -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This posting is protected under the Free Speech Laws, which applies everywhere in the FREE world, except for some strange reason, not to the mozilla.org newsgroup servers, where your posting may get you banned. Peter Potamus His Magic Flying Balloon: http://melaman2.com/cartoons/singles/mp3/p-potamus.mp3 http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sick windows machine
Lester Caine wrote: [...]It's only the one machine that is NOT seeing these sites. Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com either so I can't run windows update :( Raise your right hand and repeat this: I know that these sites use the LEAST-SECURE mechanism on the planet yet I am willing to expose my Windoze install to any infections they might want to shove down my throat. http://google.com/search?q=cache:ZXpao3MnY7wJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Update+c+gnu+501+ActiveX+requires.Internet.Explorer+MSHTMLstrip=1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Just curious about error 4.1.2
SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sick windows machine
JeffM wrote: Lester Caine wrote: [...]It's only the one machine that is NOT seeing these sites. Just discovered that it does not like microsoft.com either so I can't run windows update :( Raise your right hand and repeat this: I know that these sites use the LEAST-SECURE mechanism on the planet yet I am willing to expose my Windoze install to any infections they might want to shove down my throat. http://google.com/search?q=cache:ZXpao3MnY7wJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Update+c+gnu+501+ActiveX+requires.Internet.Explorer+MSHTMLstrip=1 It's clearing up the effects that is the reason the machine is on the bench here. The shitting thing is clean as far as the trojan goes, but I can't get to updates for Seamonkey, pctools anti-virus and other sites LIKE microsoft.com to look for explanations :( Yet it still access google and most of the other sites quite happily! I've wasted pigging 3 hours on the machine and if I could get alway with it, it would get Linux, but the customer has a some applications that will only work with windows, such as Sage accounts and their bank access package. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Sick windows machine
Lester Caine wrote: [...]when I select www.pctools.com it seems to be saying the domain does not exist, jet the same search and link works fine on the machine next door. [...]trying to update the pctools anti virus fails, and following the link in seamonkey also fails. A quick peek at that site in my GetRight browser shows it want to load 6 JavaScripts. Got that disabled? If I went there with a Mozilla browser, I'd have to block almost everything to stand it. From the contents listing I see using GetRight, that page is also one of the most cluttered, junked-up things I've encountered lately. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2
HeavyDuty wrote: SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. Hmmm, the entries I find for error 4.1.2 are linux or gcc (compiler) related. You sure about that number? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: HeavyDuty wrote: SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. Hmmm, the entries I find for error 4.1.2 are linux or gcc (compiler) related. You sure about that number? Yes about the numbers. Where did you find that definition/coe listing? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2
HeavyDuty wrote: Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: HeavyDuty wrote: SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. Hmmm, the entries I find for error 4.1.2 are linux or gcc (compiler) related. You sure about that number? Yes about the numbers. Where did you find that definition/coe listing? google is your friend do a search on error 4.1.2 or SeaMonkey 4.1.2 or SeaMonkey error 4.1.2 I was unable to uncover any references aside from specific linux or gcc compiler ones - or other programs ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: HTML and text
Michael Gordon wrote: Mark Hansen replied On 3/22/2009 3:20 PM On 03/22/09 08:49, Michael Gordon wrote: Mark Hansen replied On 3/22/2009 10:05 AM On 03/22/09 06:50, Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: snip Some folks have e-mail accounts where they are limited to the total size in bytes of their collective messages, when that limit is reached all incoming messages are blocked and maybe a server reply is returned to the sender stating the receivers mail box is full. Michael It's worse for me, Michael! Once my mailbag limit is reached, it starts to cost me extra, hard-earned, cash. Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:16:05 -0400 From: Moz Champion (Dan) moz.champ...@sympatico.ca Subject: Re: Just curious about error 4.1.2 To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org HeavyDuty wrote: Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: HeavyDuty wrote: SM 1.1.15, WinXP Pro SP3 Just curious, I was sending a simple very small text e-mail. After a minute of sending but no completion, I got an error message that said the smtp server replied error 4.1.2, and recipient domain not found. Since I was replying to a known sender, I neither mistyped nor missent. I called my ISP to find out what error 4.1.2 was. The support guy It is a sendmail error (from the SMTP process on the ISP server, watches port 24, 953, and one other - if configured for it.) Means domain not found and is a permanent error. The delay you mentioned was caused by sendmail trying to resolve whatever domain you were sending to. The length of the delay was caused by whatever sendmail is using to resolve domains. said he had no idea and besides it was an error code generated by my e-mail client, not the isp. So, did seamonkey generate this error code or did it get it from my isp and patch it into the error window? After closing the error window, I just hit send again in the compose window and, after some hesitation, it went through. I am still wanting know what error code 4.1.2 is all about. I /think/ it comes from an internet code protocol standard, but I could not find it. Thanks. Hmmm, the entries I find for error 4.1.2 are linux or gcc (compiler) related. You sure about that number? Yes about the numbers. Where did you find that definition/coe listing? google is your friend do a search on error 4.1.2 or SeaMonkey 4.1.2 or SeaMonkey error 4.1.2 I was unable to uncover any references aside from specific linux or gcc compiler ones - or other programs ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey - Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer | Direct: 408.569.7928 People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf -- George Orwell The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -- Thomas Jefferson The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed. --Alexander Hamilton ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
