NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit
D B Malmquist wrote:
EH wrote:
Hello!
When saving a link (e.g. a PDF), the 'open progress dialog' appears,
but the download does not start.
Directly clicking on the PDF link works: the PDF is loaded and then displayed.
Just tested: using the download manager also does not work! It shows me,
In Dec I went back to 1.18 because my XP had a half dozen BSODs since
I installed 2.0 in late Oct. I have not had a BSOD since returning to
1.18.
Someone suggested running Ramtest incase the BSODs were caused by some
RAM weakness. I did that - no ram errors.
However, when removing and
On 06.01.2010 07:13, JohnW-Mpls wrote:
--- Original Message ---
In Dec I went back to 1.18 because my XP had a half dozen BSODs since
I installed 2.0 in late Oct. I have not had a BSOD since returning to
1.18.
Someone suggested running Ramtest incase the BSODs were caused by some
RAM
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
The powers that be don't have the
manpower, knowledge, interest, desire, willingness to do so
I hope we have not reached the
Rufus schrieb:
...and I like the idea of using a standalone outside of the browser
itself which is integrated as a part of the basic function of the OS -
does the PC and/or Linux world incllude anything similar to Apple
Keychain? If so, maybe the way to go is to exploit that (existing?)
JohnW-Mpls schrieb:
I debated going back to SM 2.0 now but I'm spoiled by 1.18's much
simpler handling of passwords for apps that require them. Question:
is SM 2 going to be modified to handle passwords decently? And if so,
about when might that change be expected?
Could you define the
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
generate a report which you can then save as a text file
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
generate a report which you can
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have
me2 wrote:
I'm going to make the unlikely assumption that your posting was of
good intent - that you surely recognized that the initial post was a
plea to the seamonkey community to restore what I believe is an
important part of the original Netscape heritage.
A blank message serves no purpose
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on this and
generate a
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent
I've been using SM 2 for a couple of months now and have to say I've
been very happy with it. (Ubuntu 8.04)
But one thing that I do hate about it (and TB) is that I can't just select a
message and press the space-bar to open and read it (message pane). I remember
using a plug-in (not sure if it
When opening an attached file in an e-mail when the file type is a WMV.
I receive the following error.
There is a problem with the URL or file you are trying to open or play.
If you are trying to open an URL, the URL may not be valid. If you
are trying to play a file, the file type is not
After installing SM2 this afternoon I keep getting the following error
message for good few WEB sites, which with SM1 I have had no problems at all
Address Not Found
www.ebay.com could not be found. Please check the name and try again.
www.goggle.com could not be found. Please check the name and
On 1/6/2010 10:31 AM, Mike Jevtic wrote:
After installing SM2 this afternoon I keep getting the following error
message for good few WEB sites, which with SM1 I have had no problems at all
Address Not Found
www.ebay.com could not be found. Please check the name and try again.
On 01/05/2010 04:03 AM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
Just to be sure I was getting the fonts right, I opened a doc in
OpenOffice.org and used the fonts inserted the 'b' and it also shows
as in your google-chrome.png. If you'd like, I can send you a screenshot
from SeaMonkey
What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?
Wouldn't security issues be addressed by programs such as, oh, ZoneAlarm
Security Suite, let's
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he means, lets look a little deeper:
MikeyG wrote:
What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?
Death by a thousand (incompatibility) cuts :-).
For me the overriding reasons to
Alan Cummings wrote:
I've been using SM 2 for a couple of months now and have to say I've
been very happy with it. (Ubuntu 8.04)
But one thing that I do hate about it (and TB) is that I can't just
select a
message and press the space-bar to open and read it (message pane). I
remember
using a
On a PC running XP-Home, I have tried to install SM v.2.01 so that it
can be used by multiple users but I am not doing something right.
I need to have both the PC and SM accessible by four users: myself,
wife, and two grandchildren. In XP, I have a Welcome Screen account for
each of the
HenriK wrote:
On a PC running XP-Home, I have tried to install SM v.2.01 so that it
can be used by multiple users but I am not doing something right.
I need to have both the PC and SM accessible by four users: myself,
wife, and two grandchildren. In XP, I have a Welcome Screen account for
HenriK schrieb:
On a PC running XP-Home, I have tried to install SM v.2.01 so that it
can be used by multiple users but I am not doing something right.
I need to have both the PC and SM accessible by four users: myself,
wife, and two grandchildren. In XP, I have a Welcome Screen account for
On 1/6/2010 9:40 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
You can cancel *your* posts with SM [the same as any other program as
far as I know]. If you mean other people's posts, all you have to do is
The client usually allows for a way to cancel a
MikeyG schrieb:
What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey
1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as
user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available?
Why don't you at last use 1.1.18 which is the most secure 1.1.x version...
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 9:40 AM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/6/2010 8:26 AM, chicagofan wrote:
You can cancel *your* posts with SM [the same as any other program as
far as I know]. If you mean other people's posts, all you have to do is
The client usually allows for
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be
Ray_Net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us to have the
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 06:23 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/05/2010 03:27 AM, BeeNeR wrote:
Are there any plans to update the security of cookies to the settings
that were available in 1.x SM? i.e. Preferences/Privacy
Security/Cookies/Allow cookies based on privacy
Ray_Net wrote:
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit that.
Forte Agent permit us to delete the posts we want SM did not permit
that.
I don't understand either of these comments.
If you work only with SM and never with Forte Agent, i
Il 06/01/10 20:27, NoOp ha scritto:
As an update; Christian created a bug report for this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538007
[Truetype fonts referenced in the above mentioned web page are not
displayed]
We've tested confirmed in linux I also tested in Windows. Could
David Wilkinson wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Forte Agent permit us to have the posts we want to be always visible -
SM did not permit that.
Forte Agent permit us to delete the posts we want SM did not permit
that.
I don't understand either of these comments.
If you work only with SM and never with
Hi!
Seamonkey is definitely a great program and it was a very smooth
transition from Netscape v7.2
Problems I have run into as as follows:
(a) When I sen an email from the primary account, it does not show up in
the sent box and only when I close out from
using SeaMonkey and re-open, I can
On 1/6/2010 1:26 PM, chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
It sounded to me like they wanted to cancel their post. This is ultimately
a function of the news server. The user can demand the feature in their
news client all they want, but if the server doesn't provide the feature,
it's not
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
In Dec I went back to 1.18 because my XP had a half dozen BSODs since
I installed 2.0 in late Oct. I have not had a BSOD since returning to
1.18.
Someone suggested running Ramtest incase the BSODs were caused by some
RAM weakness. I did that - no ram errors.
However, when
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
does too. I'm also a bit surprised
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I like the idea of using a standalone outside of the browser
itself which is integrated as a part of the basic function of the OS -
does the PC and/or Linux world incllude anything similar to Apple
Keychain? If so, maybe the way to go is to exploit
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
does too. I'm also a
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Il 06/01/10 20:27, NoOp ha scritto:
As an update; Christian created a bug report for this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538007
[Truetype fonts referenced in the above mentioned web page are not
displayed]
We've tested confirmed in linux I also tested in
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
yes. Now it does work in FF, and I in fact used it to clear some
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
iCab is unusual in that it will (automatically if turned on check for
bad code based on latest w3c specs. Green smile face shows up if correct
or a Purple Sad face show if there are errors. you can click on
Leonidas Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he means, lets look a
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
me2 wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:14:32 -0500, Phillip Jones
pjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
I know Camino does, and I was a bit surprised to find that Google Chrome
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
David Wilkinson wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Doesn't work of Mac OSX.
You mean HTML Validator extension doesn't work on Mac OSX?
I wouldn't know about that. It works on Windows, but you have to hack
the
version numbers for SM2.
If that's what he
Javier wrote:
I was on SM 1.7 and it was working fine. I upgraded to SM2.0.1. First I
was not able to send. Changing the auth setting the SM 2.0.1 changed fixed
that. Then I ran into the address book issue. Where deleting the OA
address book that SM 2.0.1 creates, fixes the issue. There
Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
NoOp wrote:
That it not my view. My view is that perhaps you should switch from
Forte Agent, and use SeaMonkey to search all of the threads that have
already discussed this subject nearly into the ground.
Forte Agent permit us
50 matches
Mail list logo
