Re: SM 1.16 vs. Mysoju.com videos

2010-07-25 Thread NoOp
On 07/24/2010 04:45 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: NoOp wrote: ... BTW: You just made my MIL's live-in nurse _very happy_ - she couldn't get her korean soaps via cable anymore, so this will work just fine. Thanks! :-) 괜찮아요, 천만에요... 감사합니다 The main page is at http://www.mysoju.com, and the

Re: SeaMonkey v2.0.5 to v2.0.6 update didn't prompt me!

2010-07-25 Thread Daniel
d...@kd4e.com wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Ed Mullen schrieb: Perhaps because I don't want YOU to change MY system? Perhaps I just want YOU to be safe on the Internet? well, I certainly appreciate your concern for my well being. Although, I'm happy (and prefer) to take

Re: Signature file - graphic possible ?

2010-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
Manuel Reimer wrote: DoctorBill wrote: What's with the PORNO showing up on this News Group ? Can't someone delete those moronic posts ? The newsserver admin can do, but doesn't seem like someone wants to clean this up... Matter of time, I suspect this isn't really run by Mozilla but a gift

Re: Signature file - graphic possible ?

2010-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
DoctorBill wrote: I have used txt files to add a signature to my messages. Is there some way to have a graphic or photo put into the signature and have it show when sent ? I use SM 1.1 right now. Is it possible on the latest version of SM ? If not - might I suggest it for future versions !

Re: Signature file - graphic possible ?

2010-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
DoctorBill wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 7/4/2010 1:38 PM, DoctorBill wrote: Actually - I did not mean for this News Group, but for General E-Mail messages. Also, the link you sent shows what from - the EDIT | Mail News Groups Account Settings ? I send in HTML and plain text. How does one

Re: HTML Email and Signature file - graphic possible ?

2010-07-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
Gus Richter wrote: On 7/5/2010 7:32 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Info WG wrote: To Mark Hansen and others... Sending or receiving HTML Email does not mean, and should not imply getting spam, virulli, and all manner of problems. In clear fact, one could say that the vast a\majority of Emails may

Re: HTML Email and Signature file - graphic possible ?

2010-07-25 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Bill Davidsen wrote: Gus Richter wrote: On 7/5/2010 7:32 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: Info WG wrote: To Mark Hansen and others... Sending or receiving HTML Email does not mean, and should not imply getting spam, virulli, and all manner of problems. In clear fact, one could say that the vast

Re: SeaMonkey v2.0.5 to v2.0.6 update didn't prompt me!

2010-07-25 Thread Ant
On 7/24/2010 3:27 PM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: Ant schrieb: I don't mind to be notified about updates but I don't want to be forced. Let me decide to get them or not. As Jens already pointed out, in 2.1 there will be graphical preferences UI for that (there is a hidden one in 2.0, look it up

Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2. I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first? Thanks Henry ___ support-seamonkey

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Rob Lindauer
Henry wrote: I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2. I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first? Thanks Henry I'd wait for more responses from people more

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Larry
Henry wrote: I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2. I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first? Thanks Henry I recently upgraded to 2.0.4 from Netscape 7.2 (yes, it'

Re: How to filter away spam in newsgroups?

2010-07-25 Thread chicagofan
NoOp wrote: On 07/24/2010 06:35 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... Yes, currently news account filters work only on newly downloaded headers. See my other reply - I've reset the groups to make them re-download the headers, but then it appeared impossibly slow. This server

Re: How to filter away spam in newsgroups?

2010-07-25 Thread Rufus
chicagofan wrote: NoOp wrote: On 07/24/2010 06:35 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: ... Yes, currently news account filters work only on newly downloaded headers. See my other reply - I've reset the groups to make them re-download the headers, but then it appeared impossibly slow. This

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote: I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2. I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first? Thanks Henry I believe you should choose

Re: SeaMonkey v2.0.5 to v2.0.6 update didn't prompt me!

2010-07-25 Thread Philip Chee
On 25/07/2010 22:14, Ant wrote: On 7/24/2010 3:27 PM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: Ant schrieb: I don't mind to be notified about updates but I don't want to be forced. Let me decide to get them or not. As Jens already pointed out, in 2.1 there will be graphical preferences UI for that (there

disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox

2010-07-25 Thread Rick Merrill
Comcast Fancast says I must disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox and I am running SeaMonkey 2.0.6 under Wind xp sp3. AFIK I never installed firebug! What do I do now? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox

2010-07-25 Thread Robert Kaiser
Rick Merrill schrieb: Comcast Fancast says I must disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox and I am running SeaMonkey 2.0.6 under Wind xp sp3. AFIK I never installed firebug! What do I do now? Try disabling venkman (JavaScript Debugger), maybe they mistake that for the other.

What do you think about Re: Re: Subject ?

2010-07-25 Thread Ray_Net
I have done a test with a friend. I sent him a mail with the subject: TEST He reply me - The subject is now Re: TEST Then i do a forward to have the header of the received mail into the new mail - Then i modify the subject from Fwd: Re: TEST to Re: Re: TEST Then i sent the mail - so far, so

Re: What do you think about Re: Re: Subject ?

2010-07-25 Thread Ray_Net
Ray_Net wrote: I have done a test with a friend. I sent him a mail with the subject: TEST He reply me - The subject is now Re: TEST Then i do a forward to have the header of the received mail into the new mail - Then i modify the subject from Fwd: Re: TEST to Re: Re: TEST Then i sent the mail -

Re: What do you think about Re: Re: Subject ?

2010-07-25 Thread Ray_Net
Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have done a test with a friend. I sent him a mail with the subject: TEST He reply me - The subject is now Re: TEST Then i do a forward to have the header of the received mail into the new mail - Then i modify the subject from Fwd: Re: TEST to Re: Re: TEST Then i

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread d...@kd4e.com
Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going through the hassle? David E. Ross wrote: On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote: I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro SP2. I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will that upgrade

Multiple Mail Retrievals

2010-07-25 Thread JohnW-Mpls
I frequently get mail of all six of my addresses at once via get new messages, for all accounts. About once a month, my get new messages, for all accounts gets hung up - so bad I have to go online to my ISP to clear out all undelivered mail - or I found I can get the mail via Outlook Express.

Re: disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox

2010-07-25 Thread Rick Merrill
Robert Kaiser wrote: Rick Merrill schrieb: Comcast Fancast says I must disable the Firebug extension in Mozilla Firefox and I am running SeaMonkey 2.0.6 under Wind xp sp3. AFIK I never installed firebug! What do I do now? Try disabling venkman (JavaScript Debugger), maybe they mistake that

Re: SeaMonkey v2.0.5 to v2.0.6 update didn't prompt me!

2010-07-25 Thread d...@kd4e.com
I am using 2.0.5 and Seamonkey never checks for anything because I turned that feature off. Why, does it make changes to version and not increment the number? Daniel wrote: d...@kd4e.com wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Ed Mullen schrieb: Perhaps because I don't want YOU to

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread Henry
The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out. Henry d...@kd4e.com wrote: Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going through the hassle? David E. Ross wrote: On 7/25/10

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread d...@kd4e.com
My understanding was it was a bug-fix and a security-update, not really a new version. Am I misunderstanding their numbering protocol? The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out. Henry --

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/25/10 8:42 PM, Henry wrote: The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out. Henry d...@kd4e.com wrote: Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going through the

Re: Upgrade to 2.04

2010-07-25 Thread NoOp
On 07/25/2010 08:42 PM, Henry wrote: The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked out. I suggest you reconsider: