Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 10:02:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at
Richmond wrote on 08-05-18 10:02:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
NoOp wrote on 08-05-18 19:03:
On 5/8/2018 1:31 AM, Richmond wrote:
Richmond wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of
Richmond wrote:
OK I have recreated the problem as follows:
On my iPhone, I created a spreadsheet using the Numbers app. (I don't
think it matters what the attachment is, this is just an example). I
then sent this to myself by email. (It is not obvious [to me] how to do
this, I searched for it,
On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:44:05 -0400, Bo1953 <"Bo1953(NO)"@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>Just checking to find out if anyone else has had the issue with ABP not
>being dl'ed on the new SM version?
>
>What, if any, is the fall back for an adblocker or ideas as to how I can
>get it on 2.49.3?
>
On 5/8/2018 1:31 AM, Richmond wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
interpretation of embedded
On 5/8/2018 at 12:07 PM, Ray_Net created this epitome of digital genius:
Ok, Ok, but if the correction is possible thru an addon, It would be not
so difficult to put the code of the addon into the source of TB.
I did not know what a "bustage" is google-translate cannot help me in
french.
Ok, Ok, but if the correction is possible thru an addon, It would be not
so difficult to put the code of the addon into the source of TB.
I did not know what a "bustage" is google-translate cannot help me in
french.
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 08-05-18 17:09:
... they are VERY VERY FEW
... they are VERY VERY FEW volunteers
And shared mailnews code. If the TB devs don't think it can be fixed easy I
wouldn't even touch it. We really need to fix the current bustages first or
you won't see another SeaMonkey after the last 2.49.x.
FRG
Ray_Net wrote:
That's not normal to
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote on 08-05-18 14:40:
Tue, 8 May 2018 09:31:58 +0100, _Richmond_:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/show-all-body-parts/
called "show all body parts" - an unfortunate name. :)
Nice one – thanks for the reference.
That's not normal to oblige us to
Galen Thurber wrote:
On Monday, 30 April 2018 11:38:35 UTC-3, Galen Thurber wrote:
./seamonkey
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /home/west/seamonkey/libmozgtk.so:
libgtk-3.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Couldn't load XPCOM.
I'm running Xubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit
Tue, 8 May 2018 09:31:58 +0100, _Richmond_:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/show-all-body-parts/
called "show all body parts" - an unfortunate name. :)
Nice one – thanks for the reference.
--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> I'd like to request please to contact the 64-bit team and make a join
release?
If you refer to https://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download
then to everyone: Stop promoting or even mentioning this site as an alternative.
They are not in any way
On Monday, 30 April 2018 11:38:35 UTC-3, Galen Thurber wrote:
> ./seamonkey
> XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /home/west/seamonkey/libmozgtk.so:
> libgtk-3.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Couldn't load XPCOM.
>
>
> I'm running Xubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit
> gtk3 is
Thanks for the detailed answer. That site was the only 1 at a time where
I could find 64-bit versions ready to be installed, maybe notifying them
that they should give credit will fix it, I don't think their intention
is bad, rather good IMO, I don't see that site associated with Mozilla
or
> I'd like to request please to contact the 64-bit team and make a join release?
If you refer to https://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download
then to everyone: Stop promoting or even mentioning this site as an
alternative. They are not in any way associated with the SeaMonkey
Saul Luizaga wrote:
I'd like to request please to contact the 64-bit team and make a join release?
They're a bit ahead but not making much progress and the releases are betas and
alphas by their functioning, buggy, and really unstable in general, so this
stable releases maybe will help them in
Richmond wrote:
> Ray_Net wrote:
>> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
>>> The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
>>> you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
>>> interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
>>>
Ray_Net wrote:
> Richmond wrote on 07-05-18 11:54:
>> The same thing occurs in Thunderbird. I suppose you could argue that if
>> you want to display the body as plain text, then it should have no
>> interpretation of embedded headers at all, as that would be more secure.
>> But it doesn't do that
19 matches
Mail list logo
