Inbox messages history

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Whaley

Where do I find the inbox index (?) file?

I have moved excess inbox messages to a separate folder (Old Inbox), and 
want to delete what shows up in my current Inbox. Make it empty, in other words.


But, I forgot what the saved messages are (what suffix they carry (.msn?)) and 
where they're located.


Thanks for all guidance.

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Inbox oddities...

2009-11-29 Thread Keith Whaley

I'm working with Mac OS 10.6.2, and SM 1.1.18.

In the last several days, my _Inbox_ shows message count discrepancies with 
what the upper left folder window indicates (say 15 messages unread, and 2484 
total messages) and what actually shows up in the main message window, when I 
select to display only unread messages, is perhaps 5 unread messages and 828 
messages total!)


If I shut down Inbox and Home Account, then SeaMonkey, and after 10 seconds or 
so, reopen each folder, my messages revert to actual ~ 5 and 828.


Soon, it reverts (as I move from folder to folder, and visit URLs on the 'net, 
then return to Inbox.

It's never done this before.

No, I have no idea what I might have recently done, or downloaded that might 
have interfered with smooth operations of SM.


I have opened Disk Utility App. and repaired Disk Permissions, to little avail.

Who has an idea what I might try next?

A literal map leading me to go delete the Inbox .msf file might work, I guess.


Any help much appreciated.

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

2009-12-08 Thread Keith Whaley

John Boyle wrote:


[...]

All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!

John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps are 
annoying!

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .

2009-12-08 Thread Keith Whaley

John Boyle wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

John Boyle wrote:


[...]

All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!

John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps
are annoying!

keith whaley




To Keith , Leonidas ,et al: I do  apologize for the CAPS in my messages...


Okay, you're forgiven! g


but when I am shocked by attitudes of people who should know better, I
will sound off! If you notice, though, I do not use cuss words! 


Duly noted! Thanks.


I have
been trying to get the Developers and others to recognize that USERS are
NOT Developers, in the main, yet that seems to be the exact reason they
are shut off! I was totally shocked, again, when I found out through the
newsgroup and support list, that the Developers were deliberately going
to make it even harder to migrate information from one very stable
version to an even newer update of their version 2.0. Why is it only one
person really tried to give me step by step instructions on how to
migrate from 1.1.18 to 2.0, for instance? 


No idea!


I followed one persons advice,
after reassurances it would not damage the older version, and installed
2.0 in its own location, then managed to migrate my bookmarks without
any problems, but cannot get the addressbooks nor newsgroups to migrate
worth beans, yet that individual who just killfiled me could not
recognize he only half stepped in his help to me! Please forward this to
him, letting him know I apologize for upsetting statements, but when you
are an obviously unwanted low-life USER, like me, you have to expect
frustration, especially if that low-life USER also has a Heart 
problems, and also cannot even breathe properly, all the time! I just

have no time for those who have no respect for their fellow man, unless
that fellow man is kissing their feet! Bet you thought I was going to
say something else, ha ha. :-\


Oh no! You don't swear, so I expected 'feet'. g

You're right. Some folks do not know how to comport themselves in public.
Sad... However, try to reduce your anxiety and frustration...that might help 
your breathing and shortness of breath.


I pretty much agree with you, tho'

Do take care of your health, and try to not get so excited!
We'll take them on and berate their ill-advised comments, as best we can.

Later,  keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM 1.1.18 stripping attachments?

2010-02-10 Thread Keith Whaley

I use a Mac OS 10.6.2 and SM 1.1.18 for my email client.

I've had occasion recently to receive short emails from a friend, with one or 
two jpegs attached.


I wanted the entire message, with attachments, in a different folder, so I 
used _Control/Click/Move To_ to move the email.


I looked in the new location, and there were NO JPEG containing messages in 
that folder at all!


What happened to it/them?

I looked in Trash, no jpegs. That incoming message is GONE!

I've had this happen several times now, and haven't a clue as to what has 
happened, but I've LOST some important jpegs!


Advice/help please?  (The Subject line is just a guess.)

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Moving email folders out of SM...

2010-04-18 Thread Keith Whaley

I am working with SM 1.1.18, and Mac OS 10.6.3.
My email and newsgroup ISP is DSLExtreme.com, which has contracted with Google 
to handle all their email activities. I’m now using GMail, whether I want to 
or not.


I have just run across Google’s 7 GB limits on stored messages, emails, etc.

I have a few folders in SM with saved emails going back a few years.
I want to keep a few of them, which means moving the folders OUT of SM‘s Home 
Account.
I can’t find a way to do that. They won’t click-slide out of the Home Account 
folder to the desktop. There is no choice offered me when I Control-Click my 
mouse button.


Who knows how I might move any of those individual folders out of the Home 
Account?


Thanks,

keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: third mouse button (the wheel button)

2010-04-21 Thread Keith Whaley

In mozilla.support.seamonkey, S. Beaulieu wrote:

Alexandru Bledea a �crit :

how can i reset the function of the 3rd mouse button, i don't want it
to refresh the page when i click on a tab, nor do i want it to open a
new window when i click on a link with it
i want it to close the tab when you third mouse it and open a link in
a new tab not a new window



Edit - Preferences - Advanced - Mouse

S.


My SM (1.1.18 for Mac) doesn’t HAVE any Preferences item.

The SeaMonkey drop-down menu does, tho’.
What are YOU looking at that displays:
   Edit - Preferences - Advanced - Mouse?

BTW, I have no “Mouse” item either.
I only have a “Mouse Wheel.” Is that what you meant?

keith whaley
Mac OS 10.6.3
SM 1.1.18

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: MASTER PASSWORD OVER KILL !

2010-05-13 Thread Keith Whaley

JOLAN1 wrote:

Aloha!

There is something very wrong with SeaMonkey 2.04, or my installation
is somehow badly screwed up!  Initially, it asked for our Master
Password at logon, which I disabled in about:config.  But...
subsequently, it asks for the Master Password when: downloading e-
mail, accessing any one of our credit accounts, accessing banking
accounts, making auto payments, paying for our internet service, on
and on, even wants a Master Password to get on MozzilaZine !!!  Real
bother and we're using Master Password so often...might as well not
have one.

This past week, we had to hire a temporary book keeper because ours
was out sick.  The first day we had to be out of the office; came back
to find one very frustrated woman!  She couldn't access anything she
need to on the internet because she didn't have the Master Password.
Cost me $$ for the day -- upsetting, to say the least.

All our accounts are user name/password protected.  Adding the Master
Password is overkill, useless and absurd.  I've told everyone to
uninstall 2.04 and put 1.18 back on until we can get some fix for
this.

Is there any way to disable all these requests for a Master
Password ???


Interesting...
I downloaded the first off version of 2.x back when it was only a few days 
old. Your experience mirrors what I found, and essentially everybody passes 
that off as ‘not a problem.’
Well, I thought it WAS a problem, so I promptly dumped SM 2.x and want back to 
1.1.18, where I am now.
I swore I would not return to any SM 2.x version until someone fixed that 
nasty annoyance. It seems that so far they haven’t...


Thanks for the heads up,

keith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Odd message window happenings...

2010-06-13 Thread Keith Whaley

SeaMonkey 1.1.18, Mac OS 10.6.3.

In the process of selecting and reading any list messages, if I move the 
mouse cursor, and click the mouse to reposition the mouse cursor in some 
other location in that window or any place else, the colored highlighting on 
the Subject title line disappears and simultaneously the body of all listed 
and threaded messages resets to showing the chronologically first block of 
messages in the window (said another way, that window’s right hand sliding 
bar moves all the way upward).


The address of where he displayed message is located is lost, and I have to 
remind it where it came from...


Nothing happens to the message window I'm currently reading, but in order to 
delete or otherwise manipulate that message, I now have to go back locate 
the message‘s title in the list, RE-highlight it by clicking on it, and THEN 
delete it.


This just started happening a few weeks ago. I can’t connect it happening 
with anything I might have done at the time.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,  keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


disappearing messages

2010-06-19 Thread Keith Whaley

SM 1.1.18
Mac OS 10.6.4

I have a number of messages in 14 topically-named folders, sub to Inbox.

This morning I opened SM and one of those folders had perhaps 180 messages 
that have disappeared in the last day or so. It now has only 10 messages, 
where it had in excess of 180 before today.


Those messages are not in Trash.

Is there any way I can refresh the folder content, and have them reappear?

It seems some of the other folders have fewer total messages as well.

Please advise what might have happened and how to restore folder content, if 
possible.


Thanks,  keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Time Machine questions

2010-06-27 Thread Keith Whaley

I find a need to access a lot of missing emails from a few months back.

I regularly bsck up my HD from my iMac to an external Maxtor drive, using 
SuperDuper! and Time Machine.


Time machine seems cumbersome, in that that fancy-schmancy active splash
screen obscures any accessible menu item where I might command it to
retrieve data from older backups. All of which means I haven’t learned how 
to use it yet...


Be that as it may, do older SM messages still reside inside some folder on 
those backups, so I can access, read and transfer them back to my current SM 
folder?


In other words, how can I find and restore older Inbox messages from a few 
months ago?


Or can’t I?

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Saving rich message as file

2009-03-05 Thread Keith Whaley

flyguy wrote:

terje wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

terje wrote:

Hello,

Using SeaMonkey 1.1.14 email client, I tried to save a MS created 
rich message as .eml file. The messages contained embedded images 
which first was displayed correct in SM. But after saving to 
file.eml and loading the file in SM next, there was only a text 
reference ole0.bmp and the image was gone. Tried also to force file 
type .html without more success.


How to possibly save a rich message with embedded images to a file 
with images correctly? Isn't that possible?


Rgds,
Terje J. Hanssen


when saving, try clicking on the drop down and save as html, then 
don't forget to remove the eml from the name.  Did that work?




I expect you mean what I already also had tried:
SM FileSave asFile
Save as type: Dropdown - html
and remove eml from the name

1) No; opening this file.html from Seamonkey or from Firefox holds 
only a text reference ole0.bmp and no image visible.


2) The same happends if I right click on file.html or file.eml and 
select Open withSeamonkey from the context menu.


3) But I found out one way it works:
If I spesifically starts the Semonkey Email client and use 
FileOpen_File and select file.eml, then the image is displayed 
correct in the message.


The task still is to save it as a file.html so that it can be loaded 
in a web browser or OpenOffice.org to export it as pdf.



If you use a free PDF printer driver like CutePDF (cutepdf.com), you can 
print directly to PDF from SM, or from any other program that can 
print, for that matter.


I can do the very same thing with the Edit/Print/PDF command in SM 1.1.13! No 
need for a separate application. SM had already anticipated that need.


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Print Preview freezes on Office Depot's Web site?

2009-03-08 Thread Keith Whaley

Alex K. wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:


as others have said, and I will say too, there is no problem with FF 
3.  SM 1.1.x is based on the old FF 2 coding, therefore, there are 
some website coding that will not work in old FF/SM coding -- for 
example php. I will go out on a hunch and say that SM2 should work, as 
its based on FF3 coding.


I want to correct a misconception that seems to crop up here, 
occasionally, and has done so, again.


PHP is one of many *server* side scripting languages, others include 
ASP, CFM, and JSP, to name a few.  (They all behave in a generally 
similar manner, so, while I'm using PHP as the current example, you 
could substitute any of the other flavors, as well.)



[...]

Well stated, Alex!
Saved me a lot of time looking things up!  :-D

I enjoyed my Sunday morning class!

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM mail Inbox location?

2009-03-09 Thread Keith Whaley

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:



Where is SM mail Inbox located on my H.D.?

I'm running a Mac, with OS 10.5.6, and SM 1.1.13.

thanks,
keith whaley



Its in the profile.

SeaMonkey 1.1.13

(Username)LibraryMozillaProfiles(Profilename).sltMail 



Lee


I tried:

Finder/Go/Computer/Devices/Keith's Computer/Internal HD/
Library/Mozilla/Profiles/Keith Whaley/Oh2b4h2f.sit/
Mail/mail.dslextreme-1.com

There are some mail files in there, but they're all from 2005. Netscape
7.2 stuff. I suppose I can throw them out?

However, I DID find what I'm searching for by following the path:

Finder/Go/Computer/Devices/Keith's Computer/Internal HD/
Users/keithw/Library/Thunderbird/Profiles/fpeit2if.default/Mail/
mail.dslextreme.com

Thunderbird? I guess Thunderbird is sharing mail files from SeaMonkey,
but I have no SeaMonkey file under Library or Profiles!
Why not?
Anybody with an idea?


Well, from the description, more like SeaMonkey is sharing the mail 
files with Thunderbird.


Of course it did.

This is possible.  In fact that's exactly what I do, I have both 
application pointing to mail data at the same location.  That way, I can 
go back and forth between the two.


The thing is, the two applications will only do that if yo tell them to 
specifically.  You would have had to set up the accounts in SeaMonkey, 
and browsed to the TB profile location for the mail.  It won't just 
happen automagically.


Follow Grant/Peter's advice concerning finding the true location of 
your mail files, and post back here.


Lee



Just did! Both!  g

Thanks again.

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Spam in e-mails...?

2009-04-01 Thread Keith Whaley

John Doue wrote:

Jay Garcia wrote:

On 31.03.2009 10:35, John Doue wrote:

 --- Original Message ---


Jay Garcia wrote:

On 31.03.2009 09:01, John Doue wrote:

 --- Original Message ---


Cedar wrote:
Something is marking some of my e-mails with [spam], is this new 
version of sm doing this?  or would it more likely be avg 
antivirus or something?
If this is something like  [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 03.8/3.0], this 
is probably the antispam filter of your ISP or email provider. This 
feature (I call this a nuisance actually, but it can be use to 
filter incoming emails) can sometimes be turn off on the ISP/email 
provider site.




A nuisance ?? If you were one of my mail customers you would be 
singing a different tune. We flag over 8,000 spam messages daily, 
most of which are rejected by our blacklists (the customer never 
sees these).




Jay,

You misunderstood me, meaning I was not clear enough. Of course, spam 
filters are more than useful, they are a necessity (I am a spamcop 
user, I should know!).


What is a nuisance IMHO are ISP filters that let mail go through but 
add the spam score in the objet line. Unless this is user configurable.


Those scores should be transparent at the end user level.


Spamassassin is user-configurable, the default threshold is 5. Any 
message 5 or higher gets flagged. You, the user, can increase/decrease 
the default.


The issue raised by the OP was why should SPAM be inserted in the 
object of an email.



 John Doue

***

Object? I know what the Subject line or 'bar' is, what is the Object? The body 
of the mail?


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: E-mail folder lost

2009-04-01 Thread Keith Whaley

Cedar wrote:
My (newly acquired) antivirus found a virus in one of my folders where I 
keep the stuff that I want to keep.  It then deleted the entire folder! 
 Ouch!  The filename in the virus vault is named 0021_body.html:  what 
does this 0021 mean?  Is that a number that defines which e-mail was 
infected?  Is there a way to view this e-mail, or preferably this entire 
folder, would that filename mean that it's the 21st e-mail in the 
folder...?  Would there maybe be a way to delete just the offending 
e-mail and restore the others, at least?
Is this normal behaviour for an antivirus, I mean to delete the entire 
folder?  If that's the case, Wow!  what if it had been found in my main 
folder!  Ouch!


I would say no it isn't!

Seems to me that should at least have been copied to the supplier of your AV 
program!


Do let us know what they say!

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Another email query

2009-04-10 Thread Keith Whaley

Bob Minchin wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey 
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but when I try to compose 
mail, I cannot write the text of the mail.


The mail account works fully with Firefox so the hotmail end looks 
like it is configured OK.


Can anyone throw any light on this please.

TIA

Bob


I just downloaded SM 1.1.16 for the Mac, and am replying to your message using 
that version right now. Nothing seems to be wrong with 1.1.16.

It sure seems to be working for me!
BTW, I clicked on Reply, not Compose. Choosing Compose gets me a fresh, empty 
html composing window, and I _never_ use html in answering emails.


keith whaley

why can't you compose? What happens? What error messages, if any, do 
you get? When you click on compose, what happens?



The reply window opens but I cannot type in it


Have you tried changing the user agent to pretent to be FF and see 
what happens?




Sorry I don't understand this part.

Bob



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Another email query

2009-04-10 Thread Keith Whaley

Bob Minchin wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

Bob Minchin wrote:

Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:

u...@domain.invalid wrote:
When i use my windows live hotmail webmail account with seamonkey 
1.1.16 and earlier, I can read my email but when I try to compose 
mail, I cannot write the text of the mail.


The mail account works fully with Firefox so the hotmail end looks 
like it is configured OK.


Can anyone throw any light on this please.

TIA

Bob



I just downloaded SM 1.1.16 for the Mac, and am replying to your 
message using that version right now. Nothing seems to be wrong with 
1.1.16.

It sure seems to be working for me!
BTW, I clicked on Reply, not Compose. Choosing Compose gets me a 
fresh, empty html composing window, and I _never_ use html in 
answering emails.


keith whaley


why can't you compose? What happens? What error messages, if any, do 
you get? When you click on compose, what happens?



The reply window opens but I cannot type in it


Have you tried changing the user agent to pretent to be FF and see 
what happens?




Sorry I don't understand this part.

Bob



Keith, you don't appear to be using hotmail. It is only when I use my 
hotmail account that the problem appears.


Bob


Ooops! Gotcha. You're right, I don't use Hotmail.
That's both Microsoft and web mail, neither of which I like.
I'll bow out of this conversation now!  :-D

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Components

2009-05-25 Thread Keith Whaley

David E. Ross wrote:

On 5/25/2009 1:58 PM, Serge Popper wrote:
I run Seamonkey for both mail and browsing.  On certain URL's the 
original design of the page is not reproduced faithfully by Seamonkey. 
One of those URL's is American Express.  When opening a monthly 
statement the figures are shown under the wrong columns and the 
statement becomes impossible to read.  American Express says they 
support Firefox.
I'd like to know what the two components in Seamonkey are.  Is the mail 
side a version of Firefox?
Is there anything I can do in Seamonkey so that the columns and figures 
are presented as written?
I actually have to use Internet Explorer to read my American Express 
Statements.

Thanks,
Serge



American Express says they support Firefox.  Their Web server may be
attempting to detect what browser you are using.  This is called
sniffing.  In too many cases, servers sniff for Firefox when they
should instead sniff for Gecko.  That's because the component that
requests and displays the Web page is the Mozilla Gecko rendering
engine, which is used by both Firefox and SeaMonkey (although SeaMonkey
uses a version of Gecko that is one step behind Firefox).  See
http://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Sardisson/Gecko_is_Gecko for details.

One way to test my conjecture that sniffing for Firefox is involved is
to make the server think you are indeed using Firefox.  This is called
spoofing.  There are two major ways to do this.

You can install an extension such as PrefBar or UserAgentSwitcher from
Mozdev.  Use the installed extension to spoof Firefox.

You can change your user agent string manually.  (See
http://www.rossde.com/internet/intr_gloss.html#agent for a definition
and example of user agent.)  Search in MozillaZine at
http://www.mozillazine.org/ for advice on doing this.


FYI: I use a late model iMac with OSx 10.5.7, and SeaMonkey 1.1.16.
My choices when in my User Agent menu bar are:

  Mozilla 1.7.13 Lin
  MS 4.7 Mac
  NS 6.2 Lin
  SM 1.0.8 Lin
  FireFox 2.0.0.2 Lin and
  Linx.

Anybody have the idea that most of the programmers are using Linux?
Why would you think that?
Anybody with a Mac might as well forget it, and so far as anyone sniffing for 
Gecko, forget it!


keith whaley ~ a Mac user for 22+ years...



If either of these solves your problem, then please (1) report it as a
bug and (2) notify American Express.  To report a bug, go to the
American Express site; then, on the SeaMonkey menu bar, select [Help 
Report Broken Web Site].  The best way to notify American Express would
be a letter (postal mail) to the CEO; minimize (but don't eliminate)
technical jargon and include a reference to the
http://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Sardisson/Gecko_is_Gecko Web site.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: HTML message display for RSS

2009-06-04 Thread Keith Whaley

Hartmut Figge wrote:

Hartmut Figge:

Moz Champion (Dan):


Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view everything in 

 

HTML (always have) and have no problems.



Do you see then the  exactly under the 'okay'? ;)



Well, i do. But in HTML messages i doubt it.

Hartmut


I use SeaMonkey 1.1.16, and a Mac, with OS 10.5.7.

I have my View/ Message Body As/ Original HTML, and in neither message 
was the  directly under the word only.


In Harmut's [hour] 1204 and 1206 messages of today, the carets are under 
the word 'is' and the first two letters of HTML.


I see that in this automatically quoted message (above) it is almost 
under 'okay' but shifted to the left one space.
For those who wonder why, it'ss because the next line that contains only 
the 4 carets only has two 'greater than' symbols to lead the line off. 
The previous line has three, and the next line has three, but for some 
reason the caret line only has two.


It's almost impossible to get letters and characters on two successive 
lines (or more) to match up, one above the other.
Recall how when many folks make simple 'images' from ascii text, and 
expect them to come out visually correct. Far and away the majority of 
the time they show up with one or more lines shifted with respect to the 
rest.


It's pretty much a losing game.

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: HTML message display for RSS

2009-06-04 Thread Keith Whaley

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:

David Wilkinson wrote:

Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Why is HTML 'okay' in RSS but not in email or news? I view everything 
in HTML (always have) and have no problems.


Because RSS feeds generally point to web pages, and mail or news 
accounts point to messages.


So?   Still does not explain or give any reasoning why HTML is not 
'okay' in email or news.


Many don't appreciate HTML in email or news, but that's simply personal 
taste, nothing more.


I beg to differ with your 'nothing more' statement, sir.

Staying with the html part of the discussion, html is disliked for email 
and news groups because of the excessive room it takes up, and the 
length of time it takes to download.


This has been studied and discussed and picked apart and belabored over 
for years and years.
The truth remains, there are STILL many folks who use dialup and not any 
of the much faster schemes such as dsl ~ and for these folks, they 
already labor to download 'normal' text, composed of ascii characters. 
It takes up a lot more room and elapsed time to receive html formatted 
documents.


Especially for primarily content-laden messages, which get 99.5% of 
their point across using simple textual characters and NO formatting, 
why would anyone insist on loading up each message by insisting on html 
formatting, adding colors and fancy fonts, and symbols?


No, it isn't quite as simple and innocuous as you would have us believe, 
Dan.


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unread items icon in SM2

2009-06-07 Thread Keith Whaley

David Wilkinson wrote:

David Wilkinson wrote:
In newsgroups (in threaded view), the icon with green arrow that 
indicates that there are unread items in a thread is barely 
distinguishable from the one for threads with no unread items. The 
problem is that the green arrow is superposed on the icon.


In SM1.x the green arrow is much more visible because it appears below 
the icon (and is in brighter green also).


Is it just my (old) eyes?




Nobody else bothered by this?


Not particularly.
When a message is unread in a thread, in addition to the green arrow the 
Subject title is changed to a Bold font, further emphasizing the unread 
status.


BTW, I use SM 1.1.16, and (assuming that is included in your SM1.x 
category) the green arrow does not appear below the message thread icon. 
It's superimposed.


Which SM1.x were you referring to?

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unread items icon in SM2

2009-06-09 Thread Keith Whaley

David Wilkinson wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

Doesn't View-Apply Theme date back to the old Mozilla Suite?

It's now called the Default Theme but it with new icons for the
buttons. If you want the classic Classic then you'll have to look for
a third party theme that does this retro look.


In SM1.x there is Edit-Preferences-Appearance-Themes. This is no 
longer there in SM2.


Only if you have the PC version of SM.
In the Mac version, Preferences is under the 'SeaMonkey' menu drop-down.

Or, you can always press Command-comma and the Preferences window shows 
up...


keith

The SM2 default theme is fine except for the unread post icon. I just do 
not see the point of having the green arrow so muted that you (or at 
least I) can hardly see it.



--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Delete Trash

2009-06-18 Thread Keith Whaley

rjk wrote:


Answering Paul B. Gallagher, who wrote:

  Is there a way to DELETE messages in TRASH, other than 1 by 1
  I don't wanna delete the entire folder, just a date range, or after 
  doing a sort, trash that belongs to a certain individual


Assuming in the absence of any evidence that you're using SeaMonkey, 
click the first message to select it, hold down the SHIFT key and click 
the last message. Then hit the Del key. Do exactly as you would to 
delete files in Windows Explorer.


That selects all lines between the two clicks. Useful for deleting a 
large number of contiguous lines.



CTRL-click works, too, to select  noncontiguous files.


Actually, with my SeaMonkey v.1.1.16 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel 
Mac OS X...) I find that the command for selecting non-contiguous lines 
is Command-Click, not Control-Click.


keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Mozilla News. Was: AdBlock Pllus/SM (2?)

2009-06-18 Thread Keith Whaley

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


James wrote:

Hi, Paul.  To answer your last question first just go to your personal 
MY GROUPS page.  



Where???


  Good question, Paul. It isn't self-evident, is it.

  keith whaley


Then if you have a lot of groups [as I do] scroll down and find the
one you want to edit [you may have multiple pages of groups as I do].
Next, click on EDIT MY GROUPS.  Under the MESSAGE DELIVERY header of
this group select the drop down box and choose DAILY DIGEST.

I appreciate the info on Mozilla News.  When you say, ...Click the 
account Mozilla News, what page are you on in order to find Mozilla

News?  So far I just handle everything as emails.  I'm sending
myself a copy of this message so I can file the info on newsgroups.


It's a mail/news account just like my other email accounts, appears at 
the bottom of the email page right under Local Folders.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Is it possible to unselect the selected message?

2009-06-29 Thread Keith Whaley

Hana Skoumalova wrote:

Hello,

I am using SM 1.1.14 and 1.1.17, and in the mail preferences, I have 
checked the option Remember the last selected message. Sometimes I 
select a message in Junk folder by mistake and it is impossible to 
unselect it again. Whenever I open the Junk folder I get that selected 
message displayed, which is annoying: I use the three pane view and if 
no message in Junk folder is selected I can view the unread messages 
immediatly. When a message is selected, I have to switch to two-pane 
view or to move the scrollbar to be able to see headers of the new 
messages. Is there a way to unselect the selected message?


Thanks,

Hana


Select (click on) message in question. In Menu Bar: Message/Mark/As Not 
Junk.


keith whaley
SM 1.1.17
3-pane view
Preferences/Mail  Newsgroups/Remember the last selected message = checked

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


RSS feeds

2009-06-30 Thread Keith Whaley

How can I access the preferences for rss feeds display?

Before I downloaded inforss_1_2_0 this morning I had my scroll bar set 
so when a news feed item showed up, I could put my cursor over the 
article title and get a short description of what the story dealt.
Now, with the newer version, I have lost a capability or two, and don't 
recall how I can change it back!


Thanks ahead of time.

keith whaley
Mac OS 10.5.7
SeaMonkey 1.1.17
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM RSS support preferences

2009-07-02 Thread Keith Whaley
I use RSS in SM all the time, but since upgrading to SM RSS 2.0, I can't 
 control my preferences for the news feeds.


Who can help me find the place to locate Preferences for SeaMonkey?

It's not obvious to me at the moment...

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM RSS support preferences

2009-07-03 Thread Keith Whaley

Philip Chee wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:04:01 -0700, Keith Whaley wrote:
I use RSS in SM all the time, but since upgrading to SM RSS 2.0, I can't 
  control my preferences for the news feeds.


Who can help me find the place to locate Preferences for SeaMonkey?

It's not obvious to me at the moment...




The first version of SeaMonkey to support RSS natively is SM 2.0. What
preferences are you looking for? And were they before?

Phil


I'll attempt an explanation :-)

First of all, I use Mac OS 10.5.7, and SeaMonkey 1.1.17.

Sometime back, I managed to set my SeaMonkey (probably 1.1.16) up to 
receive scrolling news feeds at the bottom of the current window.


I have no recollection of exactly what I did to obtain that capability, 
but nevertheless, I did and it worked fine.


I have been receiving RSS feeds, BBC News and The Register.
A couple times I even managed to modify some preferences as to how I 
wanted to see those messages displayed.


For instance, my news feeds show up in the bottom menu bar as a series 
of up to 4 word 'headlines.' I can place my mouse cursor over the 
headline, and I will get a small message window elaborating on the 
story, to see if it interests me further.
If it does, I will click on the headline, and get a full window, showing 
the article in question.


You know all  that, but I was able to change how I wanted my news reader 
to operate, by selecting the news sources and details of how I wanted it 
displayed on my computer, etc.


The other day, a notice showed up saying RSS v. 2.0 was available, so I 
downloaded it and installed it.


Since then, I no longer get my small window elaborating on the news item 
when I place my mouse cursor over the headline.
I don't know where to go to change that preference, which is why I 
started the above Subject post...


Once I find the *Preferences* area, I'll figure out how to manipulate it 
by trial and error, as I usually do  :-) but first I have to locate it!


That's what I'm looking for.
My first problem is, I have no idea what my News Reader is called, or 
I'd do a search for it. So far, I haven't found it.

I suppose it might be a plug-in, but...

I'd appreciate a pointer or two, as I can't seem to find assistance in 
any Help menu item!


Thanks for the response, Phil.

keith whaley





___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM RSS support preferences

2009-07-03 Thread Keith Whaley

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:
Sometime back, I managed to set my SeaMonkey (probably 1.1.16) up to 
receive scrolling news feeds at the bottom of the current window.

(...)
My first problem is, I have no idea what my News Reader is called, or 
I'd do a search for it. So far, I haven't found it.

I suppose it might be a plug-in, but...




I guess it's InfoRSS http://inforss.mozdev.org/

HTH

Jens


Precisely so, Jens! That IS what I use.

Thanks a bunch. I now have it in my bookmarks bar.

Interestingly, typing InfoRSS into Spotlight or SM's Help window draws 
a blank. Nothing found at all...


keith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM RSS support preferences

2009-07-03 Thread Keith Whaley

Keith Whaley wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:
Sometime back, I managed to set my SeaMonkey (probably 1.1.16) up to 
receive scrolling news feeds at the bottom of the current window.

(...)
My first problem is, I have no idea what my News Reader is called, or 
I'd do a search for it. So far, I haven't found it.

I suppose it might be a plug-in, but...




I guess it's InfoRSS http://inforss.mozdev.org/

HTH

Jens


Precisely so, Jens! That IS what I use.

Thanks a bunch. I now have it in my bookmarks bar.

Interestingly, typing InfoRSS into Spotlight or SM's Help window draws 
a blank. Nothing found at all...


keith


One more  thing.

The InfoRSS FAQ says:

Q: Can I read the news without clicking on the headline and opening a 
new tab ?
A: Yes, since the 0.8.7 version, you can select this feature in the 
option dialog. If you move the mouse over the headline bar, the tooltip 
will open a mini browser and you will be able to view the full article.


This is what I'm currently missing in my v. 1.2.0.

I don't see an option dialog.
I used to have that mini-browser but it no longer comes up with a 
mouse over.


I'd like to restore that capability.  Please advise.

Thanks,  keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 1.1.13 not dispalying all images in Google image search

2009-07-12 Thread Keith Whaley

Benoit Renard wrote:

u...@domain.invalid wrote:
Can someone please throw some light as to why SM only displays some 
images in Google image search?


You may have blocked a server hosting such images by mistake. To check, 
open the Image Manager: Tools  Image Manager  Manage Image Permissions.


Is an address that looks to belong to Google listed there? If so, remove 
it from the list.


Point of order: I am running SM 1.1.17, and have no Image Manager in the 
Tools menu (or anywhere else I can locate) in SM. Where does one find that?


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 1.1.13 not dispalying all images in Google image search

2009-07-13 Thread Keith Whaley

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Gerald Ross wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

Benoit Renard wrote:

u...@domain.invalid wrote:
Can someone please throw some light as to why SM only displays some 
images in Google image search?


You may have blocked a server hosting such images by mistake. To 
check, open the Image Manager: Tools  Image Manager  Manage Image 
Permissions.


Is an address that looks to belong to Google listed there? If so, 
remove it from the list.


Point of order: I am running SM 1.1.17, and have no Image Manager in 
the Tools menu (or anywhere else I can locate) in SM. Where does one 
find that?


keith whaley



Do a google image search. While the resulting thumbnails are showing 
look in tools. That's how I found it in 1.1.11



You need not use Google, or indeed any other site. The Image Manager -- 
like the Cookie Manager, Popup Manager, and Form Manager -- is available 
only in the browser, not in the mail program. You can access it simply 
by opening a blank browser window.


Properly described, Paul.
I see I glossed over that before, for some reason, and drew the wrong 
conclusion. I guess I didn't feel the need to manage anything yet, but 
you're totally right.
Under Tools in SM's browser, one can manage Cookies, Images, Popups, 
Forms, Passwords and Downloads.


Thanks for the clarification.  ~ keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Password problem in SM 2.0b1

2009-08-01 Thread Keith Whaley
I just d/l SM 2.0b1 and activated it. I did have SM 1.1.17, which worked 
just fine.


On opening SM, the first window said:

Password Required
Please enter the Master Password for the Software
  Security Device.

I know of no Software Security Device. I have never heard of it.

Okay, I just found out what it is, via Help. I use no Certificates, nor 
do I ever 'sign' emails. Never have.


How do I turn all this stuff off? Don't WANT it, don't NEED it.

I have no Master Password of which I know. At least, I haven't knowingly 
used one for a very long time, and have no record of one.


I tried Preferences/Privacy  Security/Passwords...
Nothing there will let me access any of the actual passwords I really 
have for various sites, unless and until I come up with either that 
Master Password, or, the password for use with pop.gmail.com.


HALP!

I'd even play their game, and invent a Master Password, just so they'll 
quit asking and get off my back and let me use SeaMonkey as I did 
yesterday...


Thanks,

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: print problem

2009-08-13 Thread Keith Whaley

Norvin wrote:

Martin Feitag wrote:

Norvin schrieb:

Recently when I try to print an email and I hit 'print' and then I get
the small screen asking how many copies, etc, I hit the 'OK' and it
would print. Now for some reason (?) after I hit the 'print' I get the
screen but it is in the lower right section of the email screen and the
'OK' button is not in sight and I have to raise the print screen to get
to the ok button. Not a big problem for me but the wife is not
understanding why it is not working like it use to, and I guess I am to.
Any suggestions on how to move it back into the middle of the monitor to
make life easier for my wife.



Try to delete the file localstore.rdf in your profile*, SM will forget
about all window-positions then. Rearrange all windows as needed 
afterwards.

regards

Martin

* http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/profilefaq/



Martin, thank you very much for your suggestion on the file 
'localstore.rdf'. I took your suggestion one step further. I

found the file, did a 'edit/find' on print and found some instructions
defining a 'X and Y' coordinate. I experimented with the numbers and I
ended up with moving the print screen to the middle of my monitor. Yes, 
I did make a copy of the file before I edited.

Thanks again, especially from my wife.
Norvin


Holy Mackerel!
A user not only capable of understanding instructions, but able to think 
things thru under trying circumstances.

Thanks for lifting encroaching despair, Norvin!
There _are_ still those in our world worth guiding!  g  Good man!

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey mac's new Snow Leopard OS

2009-08-30 Thread Keith Whaley

KristinJ wrote:


I use SeaMonkey 1.1.17 on a MacBook Air with OSX 10.5.8.
I want to upgrade to Snow Leopard but am afraid that SeaMonkey wont
work. Are there known compatibility issues?
Thanks! :)


I have a late 2007 20 iMac, 2.0 Ghz, intel C2D, OS 10.5.8. SeaMonkey 
1.1.17.
Installed Apple-supplied OS 10.6.0, right over my 10.5.8, and an hour 
later, all was well...


SeaMonkey works like a champ! So does everything else!

Any other questions, pleae ask. So far, all is well here in SL-land!

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey mac's new Snow Leopard OS

2009-08-31 Thread Keith Whaley

KristinJ wrote:


On Aug 30, 7:16 pm, Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:



KristinJ wrote:



I use SeaMonkey 1.1.17 on a MacBook Air with OSX 10.5.8.
I want to upgrade to Snow Leopard but am afraid that SeaMonkey wont
work. Are there known compatibility issues?
Thanks! :)


With SeaMonkey? Seems not. See below.


I have a late 2007 20 iMac, 2.0 GHz Intel C2D, OS 10.5.8, SeaMonkey
1.1.17.
Installed Apple-supplied OS 10.6, right over my 10.5.8, and an hour
later, all was well...
SeaMonkey works like a champ! So does everything else!
Any other questions, please ask. So far, all is well here in SL-land!

keith



Wow! that's great, Keith!
I've read that users had a lot of problems with firefox so I just
expected it would be even worse with SM, as there are fewer SM users
(at least that's what I assume). I appreciate your feedback. So, did
you install Snow Leopard and then reinstall SM 1.1.17 or did the new
mac OS permit you to use your already installed SM version?

Thanks!
:)


I didn't protect SeaMonkey in any way.
Nor did I remove any of the previous OS. I backed up my internal HD 
first, then installed SL direct from the DVD Apple sent me.
When SuperDuper! 2.6 finished backing up, I tried to boot from the 
external Backup Drive, as I've done in the past. I had originally 
intended to install SL on it, and use it instead of the internal drive 
for a while, to see how SL behaved. Sort of saving my iMac's internal 
drive just in case something weird happened.


However, a warning screen showed up, saying I could not install SL on 
the Backup drive, because it doesn't use the GUID partition table 
scheme. This is something new to me...


That threw me a bit, so with little other obvious choice I decided to 
install 10.6 on my internal drive, right smack on top of 10.5.8, and 
take a chance they'd get along without fighting!


In sum, it installed very well, no glitches, and after the OS was 
installed, I started up my previously installed SeaMonkey 1.1.17 and it 
acted like nothing had happened at all!


Good luck. I do like Snow Leopard so far. It's crisper acting, and I've 
had no problems at all.
And, BTW, for those uaing the older MS Office 2004, I utilized Power 
Point yesterday to view an old photography .pps site, and it worked 
flawlessly! Under 10.5.8, PP had been a bit spastic and not always 
responding in the manner I expected. Yesterday, no problem at all.


So far, so good!
Today I'll open up Firefox 3.5.2 and see how IT gets along with SL!

keith



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Site doesn't appear correct on SM 1.1.17

2009-08-31 Thread Keith Whaley


Phillip Jones wrote:
Hello, it been a while I vowed never to come back to this forum except 
to ask a question. I remain true to my vow. I am asking a question


I have a puzzle.

examine this page with SM 1.1.17:

http://villageelectronicsservice.com/VacationSchedule.aspx

Now use: SM 2, FF3.0/3.5, Omniweb, Opera or iCab.

In all of those All-in-ones and Web Browsers The page for me views as it 
should.


In SM 1.1.17

after the side text is shown then the main text shows about an inch to 
inch and a half wide.


On my SM 1.1.17, the body text shows up on the left side of the main
body, as a 3/4 wide vertical strip.

On the other hand, it renders perfectly in my FireFox v.3.5.2.

using the w3c validator, typing the  link above shows numerous items 
needing correction and several warning. yet the other applications 
appear to load correctly. If you go to any links other than vacation, 
the pages work even on SM1.1.17.


Anyone have an explanation.


Sorry. Can't offer any remedy or explanation, but can confirm what you
have experienced...
I look forward to FF 2.0, but use none of the others you mentioned...
Nice to see you back again, even if it IS for a brief time...

keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey mac's new Snow Leopard OS

2009-08-31 Thread Keith Whaley


William Greenwood whg...@att.net wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

KristinJ wrote:


On Aug 30, 7:16 pm, Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:


[...]


In sum, it installed very well, no glitches, and after the OS was
installed, I started up my previously installed SeaMonkey 1.1.17
and it acted like nothing had happened at all!

Good luck. I do like Snow Leopard so far. It's crisper acting, and
I've had no problems at all. And, BTW, for those uaing the older MS
Office 2004, I utilized Power Point yesterday to view an old
photography .pps site, and it worked flawlessly! Under 10.5.8, PP
had been a bit spastic and not always responding in the manner I
expected. Yesterday, no problem at all.

So far, so good! Today I'll open up Firefox 3.5.2 and see how IT
gets along with SL!

keith



Keith, did you include the optional Rosetta as part of your SL
install? Bill


To answer your question 1st and THEN elaborate, no I didn't.
I wasn't aware that Rosetta was an optional install. Nothing I read
informed me of such.
During installation, is SL supposed to or reported to offer you that
choice? If so, I didn't see that option. I stayed near the monitor as SL
was loading, but definitely didn't read every screen that showed up.
If I was offered that option, it must have been for a short time, and
proceeded without my intervention.

So far, only two things of interest have happened during my SL
installation and immediately subsequent:

Right after installing SL, I tried to access my Canon printer, and all
that showed up was my Brother fax/copy machine.
A minute or two of dialog about looking for another printer driver was
all it took. It (the OS?) immediately selected the appropriate Canon
driver, and it all worked after that.

Last glitch was, I turned on my Epson scanner and was told I couldn't
scan with my setup (I paraphrase wildly!)
Anyhow, I was asked if I wanted the system (?) to go get Rosetta and
install it, preparatory to scanning.
I said yes and it DID. Immediately!
I was impressed. I proceeded to scan without any further annoyances.

Subsequent to that, I've had no problems of any kind!

Does that answer your question?

keith




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Can you open the Mail Client instead of the Browser first?

2009-09-15 Thread Keith Whaley

mozdev wrote:

Is this possible via Key Commands or prompts?


It is in SM 1.1.18: SM/Preferences/Appearance.

Checkmark When SM starts up, open Mail  Newsgroups.

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey slowdown

2009-09-22 Thread Keith Whaley

Richard Owlett wrote:

Lee wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:


You're not alone in that experience.

SM 1.1.17 wasn't like that.

On the other hand, I have just moved to Mac OS 10.6.1, so I don't 
know if there might be some minor incompatability thing going on.I 
suppose in time that will be addressed...


As a slight (but related?) aside Firefox 3.5.2 is displaying web site 
window glitches it never displayed before, too...



Hi Keith

Thanks for the feedback, I will assume that the minor problem
will be rectified in future versions.  BTW I am running Vista on
my machine so it is doing it on 2 different OS.  I can live
with it but it is frustrating to have to wait on each item in
a newsgroup even though it is not very long and when you are
used to it being speedy the slowdown is noticeable.  Funny
how things have changed and we now a days are so impatient!~

Lee (in Florida)


And I remember fast being 300 Baud, high speed paper tape, and memory 
with micro-second cycle time ;)


As do I.
In fact, when I got a setup capable of 9600 baud, I even took out a new 
address: keith9...@...! That was FLYING!  :-D


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey slowdown

2009-09-22 Thread Keith Whaley

Lee wrote:

Richard Owlett wrote:

And I remember fast being 300 Baud, high speed paper tape, and memory 
with micro-second cycle time ;)


I remember $200 for a 200 meg HD for my Amgia!

Lee (in Florida)



Aha!  You see, had you ordered one for your Amiga, it would have cost FAR 
less!  :-D


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Ribbon for SeaMonkey?

2009-09-23 Thread Keith Whaley

David Wilkinson wrote:

Rumor has it

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138395/Mozilla_plans_to_ribbonize_Firefox 



that FireFox will adopt a ribbon interface on Vista and Windows 7.

Is this going to happen for SeaMonkey also?



I went to the above site, and there are no illustrations that depict just what 
the heck they're talking about!

Where can I go to see an example of ribbonizing in action?

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unread message count...

2009-09-23 Thread Keith Whaley

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

I recently changed to SM 1.1.18, and in my left hand window, where the 
various account folders are displayed, I had folder name, Total 
messages and Unread messages laid out such as:


Folder Title  Unread   Total
  Inbox33566

All of a sudden, I have:

Folder Title   Total
  Inbox(33) 566

- where the current unread message count is up against the folder 
title, in parentheses.


That scheme is still readable, and I've no objections to the change, 
except, why DID it change? I've been operating SM 1.1.18 since the day 
it was released, and now a month later, it decides to display things 
differently, seemingly arbitrarily.



At the top of the column where your folders are listed, you may notice 
the column heading Name, and to the right of that a little icon. If 
you click the icon, you can toggle on/off the columns Unread, Total, and 
Size. If you enable Unread, you'll get the old-style numbers in their 
own column.


So the answer is that somewhere along the way I had inadvertently toggled that 
icon. Amazingly simple.


Thanks for that, Paul

keith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

2009-09-29 Thread Keith Whaley
I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM, and as far as I know, it 
has never shown up on this support list, so I'm sending it again.

Apologies if I'm the only one that didn't get a copy, and you've all seen it.
I'll risk that this one time...

Thanks,  keith whaley

original message**

A while back, I started a small discussion here about an oddity I was 
experiencing with my Finder's desktop.


To begin with, I use the Snow Leopard OS, v. 10.6.1.
My mail/news client is Mozilla SeaMonkey 1.1.18.

My problem is, _sometimes_ when I have some window on top, mostly filling the 
screen, and I try to move it aside a little, by click-and-drag on the window's 
uppermost bar, to see what's underneath, and release the mouse cursor after 
moving the top window aside, that window snaps back to where it was originally.


In other words, I cannot move the window and expect it to STAY where I put it!

Yes, I know I can press my mouse's scroll ball, to reveal what windows I have 
open, but in this instance, I wanted to view the window full size. Pressing 
the mouse button reduces the size of all windows, to be able to display all of 
them. I didn't want that.


To briefly recap, the last time this happened someone on this list suggested I 
go to the SM menu bar item Window/Zoom. That does indeed jostle the top 
window, and when I first tried that technique, it freed the window's rubbery 
attachment to the screen, and I thought I had that problem solved for all time.


Nope.

That just happened again, so I tried Zoom. It jostled the window, but the 
'rubber band' effect keeps pulling that window to it's original position on 
the screen. So, that's not a solution to the problem...


I can't tell you WHAT window I had up, nor what led up to my wanting to take a 
look at the other windows, but I sure would like to know what's going on!
BTW, I was in the mail/newsgroups side of SeaMonkey when this happened, not in 
Navigator.


This snapping back to a previous position is a big annoyance to me, and I'd 
like to know how to get out of it when it happens.


Thanks,  keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

2009-09-29 Thread Keith Whaley

Keith Whaley wrote:


I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM...



That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6.

Thanks, keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting

2009-09-29 Thread Keith Whaley

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:


Keith Whaley wrote:


I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM...



That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6/09.

Thanks, keith


As a linguist I'm always on the lookout for new vocabulary. Would you be 
so kind as to explain which month is zero?


Uhhh, one of the binary months?

Hah! It took a linguist to point out that when I'm mostly asleep, my fingers 
don't fit in place on the keyboard exactly as they should!


9/26/09 is correct, I just neglected to proof my own typing. Sighhh.

I was tempted to say, Just wanted to see if anyone really reads these 
messages. But I thought it better to just admit a failure to function 
efficiently in the wee hours.


Thanks!

keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey v2 RC - How to disable email feature?

2009-10-14 Thread Keith Whaley

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Russell wrote:
Perhaps someone will jump in with an easy fix. I do hope the final 
release offers the same install flexibility as did the

previous versions.



SeaMonkey 2.x will not allow installing without the mailnews component.

Robert Kaiser


FWIW, I don't think it should!
Why have a suite if you only want to use half of it?
There are rational alternatives...

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM RC2 Build 3 Win location

2009-10-19 Thread Keith Whaley

David Wilkinson wrote:

INFO WG wrote:

Atten: Robert Kasiser

Robert, the latest SM RC2 Build 3 that is the Build we need to be 
Windows testing, that is the 13MB file at:


Index of 
/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/update/win32/en-US 



http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/2.0rc2-candidates/build3/win32/en-US/SeaMonkey%20Setup%202.0%20RC%202.exe 



??



INFO WG:

No offense, but this habit of routinely replying to posts and changing 
the subject line is very disruptive, because it causes SM1 (and I think 
all Mozilla news-readers) to lose the threading.


Maybe you don't use the threaded view, but most/many people do.


I have been using SM for a long time now, the Mac version, and I have no 
problems with threading.
If anyone changes the Subject line on an existing message, the 'new' message 
will appear in the same thread in which it originated, without regard to what 
the Subject line is.


The word 'routinely' gives me pause, however, because if someone wants to 
change the topic entirely, they ought to post a new message. It's not all that 
difficult.


keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 1.1.18 -- How to: NOT download messages on server first time in.

2009-10-23 Thread Keith Whaley

jim wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:55:35 -0400, jim j...@earthlink.com in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:


Seamonkey 1.1.18 -- How to:  NOT download messages on server first time in

Win Xp SP2
Seamonkey 1.1.18

Obviously this is a simple setting -- somewhere.  I did not find it.

Where do you tell Seamonkey to NOT download current server email inbox for
your account when Seamonkey 1.1.18 is booted?

Thanks,

jim



Try this:

Go to: Edit/Mail  newsgroup Account settings/home account/Server settings/

UN-click Automatically download new messages.

I think that will work for you...

keith whaley
Mac OS 10.6.1
SM 1.1.18
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 1.1.18 -- How to: NOT download messages on server first time in.

2009-10-23 Thread Keith Whaley

jim wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:55:35 -0400, jim j...@earthlink.com in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:


Seamonkey 1.1.18 -- How to:  NOT download messages on server first time in

Win Xp SP2
Seamonkey 1.1.18

Obviously this is a simple setting -- somewhere.  I did not find it.

Where do you tell Seamonkey to NOT download current server email inbox for
your account when Seamonkey 1.1.18 is booted?

Thanks,

jim



Too often the answer to a question comes to me just after i have written
it down and sent it. There must be something in the act of explanation and
asking that spurs me.   (Server settings of mail  newsgroups account)

However, that is not always the case. :-) 


jim


That supports my long-held contention that to really learn a subject in more
depth, try to teach it or explain it to someone! Absolutely so! You will gain
a greater understanding of whatever it is you try to explain to someone.

Good point.

keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0 RC2: will modal window for About:SeaMonkey return?

2009-10-25 Thread Keith Whaley

Robert Kaiser wrote:

asmpgmr wrote:

Well the tiny round buttons aren't good. I've never seen any app have
buttons like that, it needs normal buttons. Also what do you perceive
as wrong with the 1.x design ? It looks perfectly fine to me. People
who don't like dialogs can use the download manager and that's great,
there's a choice. Why make the dialog unusable to those who prefer
dialogs ?


The tiny round buttons are IMHO one of the better designs in that 
progress window. It's no dialog anyhow, it's a progess window.


But perhaps we should have just remove them altogether, would have saved 
me lots of work and us all lots of discussions.


Robert Kaiser


I like tiny round buttons, but...what to do when you run across a button icon 
that does not display a text description when you pass your mouse cursor over 
it? Is there a toggle for that action somewhere?


Every window that displays, at least in Mail  Newsgroups AND in Navigator, 
has a title bar (my name for it) with the name of the window you're looking 
at, the omnipresent oval button far right, and the three little round buttons 
far left, with X, - and + inside them.
Obviously the X closes the window, the - seems to minimize the window and zoom 
it into the Dock, and what does the + window do? On mine, pressing plus moves 
the current window to the top left of the available screen space.

What's that all about?
Since I have no owner's manual for my SM 1.1.18, and particularly in the 
absence of the drop-down textual identity windows I mentioned above, I have to 
_guess_ what the actions are for...


I tried looking thru Help, but finally gave up finding anything about them. 
They don't seem to HAVE a name.


So, would it be too much trouble to add drop-down mouse-over I.D. windows for 
each icon?


keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0 RC2: will modal window for About:SeaMonkey return?

2009-10-26 Thread Keith Whaley

Benoit Renard wrote:

Robert Kaiser wrote:
Hell, that was a joke! Am I the only person in the world who uses some 
humor in blog posts now and then?


It would seem that you poorly communicated that it was a joke, as 
asmpgmr isn't the only one who thought you were being serious.


Two things:

Readers can't see your facial features, so smiles are invisible, and raised 
eyebrows are invisible, and widened eyes are invisible...
That's precisely why many folks use smileys, but others look on their use with 
disdain.


Secondly, many folks depend on body language, including facial features, to 
pick the humor out of humorous sarcasm, and just plain miss it!


It is most difficult to portray nuances in person-to-person communication that 
is only written, so you have to let your language do it FOR you!


So, in all fairness to Robert K, who ordinarily does a most excellent job at 
communicating his intent, I really wouldn't call it poorly communicated but 
incompletely communicated.

And most of us are guilty of that lapse on occasion!

keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - A Mac User's Observations

2009-10-28 Thread Keith Whaley

Rufus wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Rufus wrote:

Leonidas Jones wrote:



If you use the Password Manager, you need to set up a Master Password.
All of the information from my 1.1.18 Mozilla folder transferred
correctly, including my Master Password. It's just that SM seems to be
asking for it at random - this was also a problem for me with SM 1.1.18.



Well,I use the Password Manager quite frequently, and I have never set
up a Master Password. Password Manager works just fine without it.


...interesting...I've never used Password Manager without a Master 
Password.  Without a Master, I'd think anyone that opened your browser 
could launch the Password Manager and read all of your passwords.  Not a 
very secure way to operate, IMO...


I submit that not all users NEED a Master Password for ordinary password 
protection. My computer is not accessible to anyone but my wife and I, and

it's as safe as the lock on my front door!

SM 1.1.18 has been great all this time, but my brand new 2.0 is a PITA.
It didn't transfer all my messages over in the mail client. All messages stop 
in late July of '09. I had a LOT more than that, but right now they're missing.
The annoyance of missing THREE month's messages overcomes my being able to 
enjoy the newness of 2.0.

So, I'm back using 1.1.18 instead...

keith whaley
mid-'07 iMac
OS 10.6.1

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Problem with imported e-mail profile Seamonkey 2.0

2009-10-29 Thread Keith Whaley

Broadback wrote:

Bill Davidsen wrote:

Hartmut Figge wrote:


Your comment is useful as a better way to work around the problem, but 
if others have seen (or not) this behavior info would be useful.


I have gone back to 1.1.8 because it keeps asking for my password when 
attempting to send emails, even when it seems to have the correct one. 
On returning to 1.1.8 it all works perfectly. I am not conversant enough 
to start going into files.


Precisely so. That's most annoying. I'm back using my 1.1.18, too...

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Keith Whaley

Gabriele wrote:

HilsB ha scritto:

First thanks to all for a great upgrade to SM2.



I agree :)

[cut]



Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software
security device' - no other passwords required after registering
1.1.18's mail / newsgroup passwords.
My question - how to stop SM2 startup 'Master Password Required' at each
startup.



The same here on OSX Tiger, it's a bit annoying.

Gabriele


It's just as annoying on Snow Leopard, trust me! WHAT Software Security 
Device? Didn't have one before, don't want one now. Baloney.
I've gone back to 1.1.18 and unless and until they change that or come up with 
a solution, I'm staying right there.


An additional complaint: moving to 2.0 didn't bring all my mail folder 
contents over with it. Roughly 1/3 showed up. All the folders did, but not all 
the content. I didn't bother to check out the browser side of things; no need 
at that point.


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Software security Master Password

2009-10-31 Thread Keith Whaley

Phillip Jones wrote:

Gabriele wrote:



Now at each startup of SM2 'Master password required for Software
security device' - no other passwords required after registering
1.1.18's mail / newsgroup passwords.
My question - how to stop SM2 startup 'Master Password Required' at each
startup.



The same here on OSX Tiger, it's a bit annoying.

Gabriele



 for Mac only:

SeaMonkey Menu  Preferences  Privacy  Security  Master password 
choose The first time its needed.


I have a Mac, run OS 10.6.1, and don't want nor need a password, so I opted to 
NOT select a password. Now what?


I just checked my Preferences on 1.1.18, and I must have set one, a long time 
ago, as that radio button has a dot in it, but all this time I've never been 
asked to deal with any Software Security Device. Must be new with 2.0.


keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0 - sensitive info storage?..

2009-11-01 Thread Keith Whaley

KaiRo - Robert Kaiser wrote:

Keith Whaley schrieb:

I have a feeling I might want to know a litle more detail about that
last sentence.
Would you kindly elaborate on ...we always encrypt, but default
generate a key from an empty master password.?


Not on personal mail, if you want a reply, please send a message to the 
newsgroup, I'm overburdened with mail and others might want to read the 
reply as well.


Robert Kaiser 


Sorry, Robert. Sending you a personal reply was not my intention.

This is virtually the only media group where I can't just hit Reply to add a 
amessage of my own to the group, but have to hit Reply All and then edit the 
To header.
All other groups and lists I read send my response to the entire group, as 
they should. Not this one. Pressing Reply sends your response comment ONLY to 
the last person who posted to the list or group, as an individual.


So, adding a response to a message I read is knee-jerk Reply, but that doesn't 
work with support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org.


I have just done that with your message.

Thanks for the reminder.

--
keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Zooming Pictures

2009-11-08 Thread Keith Whaley

starrin wrote:

[...]


Perhaps you can tell me why any www page I load in to 2.0 is way too
big, and I am forced to zoom to 50-75% in order for it to display.
That would be acceptable, but the zoom is not enduring; I must redo it
for each page.  The prior version it replaced was not this way, nor is
a similar install on another machine I have.
TIA


I can think of one possibility: Perhaps you or someone else changed your 
monitor resolution?

I currently use 1024 X 768 (stretched).

If I go to the finder's window menu bar and select the monitor image icon, 
then pick the next larger pixel size, 800 X 600 (stretched), I find nearly all 
the displays exceed the screen size. Changing to a numerically larger number 
of pixels should work. If you don't like it, you can switch back to what yoy 
had previously, instantly.


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-08 Thread Keith Whaley

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Arne wrote:

You mean that I can't even opt out the Chat?


Contrary to MailNews, ChatZilla is an extension which just happens to 
come pre-installed with SeaMonkey 2. AFAIK you cannot opt-out during the 
installation (never used the installer) but afterwards you can simply 
uninstall (or just disable) it using the Add-on Manager.


HTH

Jens



Does this Add-On Manager only occur in 2.0? I don't see it in 1.1.18.

Thanks,  keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0

2009-11-08 Thread Keith Whaley

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Arne wrote:

You mean that I can't even opt out the Chat?



Contrary to MailNews, ChatZilla is an extension which just happens to
come pre-installed with SeaMonkey 2. AFAIK you cannot opt-out during
the installation (never used the installer) but afterwards you can
simply uninstall (or just disable) it using the Add-on Manager.

Jens



Does this Add-On Manager only occur in 2.0? I don't see it in 1.1.18.

Thanks, keith


Indeed, it is the single most important addition to SM 2.0.  NOw it is 
simple to install, remove, and manage extensions and themes, a constant 
battle in the older versions.  For me that makes it worth updgarding all 
by itself.


Lee


It sounds as tho' it might be indeed!

I'll look forward to using it. AND getting rid of Chatzilla!  g

Many thanks,  keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?

2009-11-09 Thread Keith Whaley

»Q« wrote:

In news:3iadnwfge7zk_grxnz2dnuvz_vsdn...@mozilla.org,
James res07...@gte.net wrote:


I still would appreciate it if anyone can tell me if there is a way
to PROPERLY reply [without creating the problem with new threads]
from the mailing list interface.




If you're receiving all the list e-mails, instead of just digests,
simply replying should work fine without creating new threads. 


It doesn't. I don't receive digests, but daily input to my mailing list, and 
it does the same thing James has a problem with. My convoluted way of using 
the mailing list is no fun either, but it does not seem to create any changes 
to how the message is threaded, nor any change to the Subject line.

I see no need for this annoyance, but it continues.


(You weren't actually creating new threads, but your replies were
threaded under the digest posts, which most people don't have copies of.)




If there is not then why the heck is it even provided?  Members of
this list obviously don't want to have to struggle with a new thread
with every reply.


Digests are mostly useful for people who want to keep up with what's
going on in a list without actually participating.  People who want to
subscribe to the digests only but still reply to them should do what
you did, changing the Subject, but also mention in the body that
they're replying to digests so the regulars don't get bent out of shape.


keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?

2009-11-09 Thread Keith Whaley

William Morrison wrote:

Keith Whaley wrote:

William Morrison wrote:

James wrote:






James, for future reference, when posting here with a problem, ALWAYS
use reply, so that your messages stay in one threading, so people can
chase up whats been suggested before so they don't repeat what others
have said.

Then, to stop each post getting too long, you can snip (i.e. cut 
and

delete) out the old stuff (as Lee did a few posts back), just leaving
enough for people to follow whats going on.

Good to see you've fixed your problem.

Daniel


For the record, James was using the mailing list interface, and
receiving a digest of posts periodically. Using the Reply key was 
going

to send a reply to the entire digest, and would not have threaded
anyhow. We got him set up on the news server and all is well.

Lee


.
.
And it is much appreciated.

I still would appreciate it if anyone can tell me if there is a way to
PROPERLY reply [without creating the problem with new threads] from the
mailing list interface.

If there is not then why the heck is it even provided? Members of this
list obviously don't want to have to struggle with a new thread with
every reply.

Incidentally, I always used reply on the mailing list just as I have
here; that doesn't work on the mailing list.

Thanks,
James


I know Reply All worked in the email client going through 
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org but you had to remove the 
originating sender so they don't get double of what you send but 
don't know if it works the same in newsgroup so I'm sending this 
through newsgroup. If you get this from the newsgroup and as a direct 
email James and this threads correctly I would suggest using the 
Reply All. If not then your guess is as good as mine.


It worked just fine that way, William, since you started from within 
the newsgroup.
But since I can answer the support list messages from either the 
newsgroup OR the mailing list, and if I'm already IN the mailing list, 
why not answer it from there instead of exiting the mailing list and 
opening the newsgroup, to answer ONE message, and going back to the list?

They both cover the very same words, so why is a mirror necessary?

Better said, when one is in the mail list already, and selects 'Reply' 
why is the header set up to put the last individual poster to any 
thread in the To slot instead of the CC slot?
Or, why send a personal copy to the last person to post to the group 
at all?

What's the point?

Put another way, why should I even belong to the newsgroup so long as 
support-seamon...@lists... exists? I get my messages at both places 
right now. If I dropped the newsgroup, but kept getting all the 
support- messages by way of the mail list, I don't NEED the newsgroup 
to communicate.


All this discussion to avoid fixing the situation so that selecting 
Reply replies to the support group instead of one person (the last 
poster). Odd.


keith whaley


What you said is very true but as you can see or maybe can't see is that 
I am not responding to you thru the NG this time but using the list to 
do so and that your not going to get a direct mailing of it because I 
simply clicked on reply all and then deleted your address from the 
sending address bar. I'm not sure how the list is setup but know from 
experience with Yahoo Groups that this problem may not be a problem of 
SeaMonkey's but of Google's where the list, I believe, originates and a 
simple change in the settings of the reply to preference by the 
moderator of the list could repair. 


That's possible. I guess that first the oddity of the action of having a 
mail-list as well as a newsgroup mirroring each other's messages must be resolved.


IOW, what does the newsgroup do that the email list couldn't, or doesn't 
already?
Does eliminating one or the other harm the participants of either? How?

I'm on over one hundred Groups on
Yahoo and each has their settings different so I have to watch when 
replying to them if clicking reply just sends it to the posting member 
or back to the Group for distribution to all members.


Right. So, considering that AT THE MOLMENT I get news messages in teh 
newsgroup as well as in the mail list, I'm going to quit/delete my connection 
to the newsgroup, and see whether I still get messages!

If I still do, let's see what the header shows this time!

Thanks for the post.

Oh wait! I see that in THIS post's header, the newsgroup is NOT shown, but 
Google or Yahoo, whichever, manages to put YOUR name on top, and that's the 
person who gets any further answers, not the group at all!


Support-seamonkey... does get listed as a CC, but, not in the header of my 
reply. My reply was ONLY addressed to you, personally!


So everyone can see what's happening, I'll ADD support-seamonkey... to the 
header as CC, but as it was first delivered to me, to send back, it only had 
your (William's) name on the mail!


There's STILL something screwed up, isn't

Re: WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?

2009-11-11 Thread Keith Whaley

»Q« wrote:

In
news:mailman.669.1257778802.526.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org,
Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:


»Q« wrote:

In news:3iadnwfge7zk_grxnz2dnuvz_vsdn...@mozilla.org,
James res07...@gte.net wrote:



I still would appreciate it if anyone can tell me if there is a way
to PROPERLY reply [without creating the problem with new threads]
from the mailing list interface.  



If you're receiving all the list e-mails, instead of just digests,
simply replying should work fine without creating new threads.



It doesn't. I don't receive digests, but daily input to my mailing
list, and it does the same thing James has a problem with. My
convoluted way of using the mailing list is no fun either, but it
does not seem to create any changes to how the message is threaded,
nor any change to the Subject line. I see no need for this annoyance,
but it continues.




The usual approach is to create a folder for list posts to be
automatically put in, and to create a rule which changes the To header
to the list address automatically whenever you reply to a post in that
folder.  


Creating a message filter to put all Support-seamonkey... messages in is the 
easy part.
All that does for me is NOT put those particular incoming messages in my 
Inbox, but intercepts the incoming and puts SM messages in the SM folder.
Yes, that certainly is very convenient, and a great tip, but doesn't address 
the header mess.



Some clients add a reply to list button in addition to the
reply to sender button.  I don't know if that's easy to do (or even
possible) with SeaMonkey.


I think the best I could do with SM 1.1.18 is to 'Send a Copy To'.
I'm pretty sure that works after you have composed a message. I'm sure it will 
not 'reply to list'. I can't find a way to accomplish that on my current SM.


Thanks for the words.

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bug:Dragging a link to addressbar simply appends it to existing URL.

2009-11-11 Thread Keith Whaley

Daniel wrote:

Rex wrote:
I like how one can select a text link on a page and drag it to the tab 
bar for it to open in a new tab- or drag an existing link to do the same.
However when I try dragging a link to the address bar (to make it open 
in the current tab), it just gets appended there.
Let's say I'm on www.example.com, and there's a link to 
www.anothersite.net

When I drag the link to addressbar, the text there changes to:
http://www.example.comhttp://www.anothersite.net

This feature works fine in Firefox, I've used it several times there.



Rex, why would you want to drag it to the address bar?? Why not just 
click on it??


(I know you say you can do it in FF, I'm just wondering why anybody 
would want to??)


Daniel


I'm not trying to be obstreperous here, but...I read Rex's question as What 
makes that URL change take place?


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: So long, and thanks for all the fish

2011-07-20 Thread Keith Whaley

Jay Garcia wrote:

On 16.07.2011 22:15, JeffM wrote:

  --- Original Message ---


Graham wrote:

I'm liking Seamonkey less and less
[Large amounts of text elided]



Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.



What else is required other than to be a user, I thought his post was
quite eloquent and nowhere near being trollish.


Hear! Hear!

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


H.D. Icon Q.

2011-07-23 Thread Keith Whaley

SM 2.0.14
iMac w/OS 10.6.8

Suddenly, the other day, just as my ext. backup H.D. went south, my 
Internal H.D. icon turned to display like a Time Machine drive, with the 
3/4 arrowed circle and clock hands inside.


It used to display as an ordinary enclosed disc drive.

I can derive no clue from Get Info, which calls it a 250 GB drive, 
formatted as Mac OS Extended (Journaled). No other pertinent info.


Every time something visibly changes...I want to know why it did that.

Thanks,

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: this is what i hink ...

2011-07-23 Thread Keith Whaley

E. Wong wrote:

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 7/21/2011 6:15 PM, km wrote:

... it is gud for people to make comments abt what needs
to be fixed with 'sm' BUTT these same people should suggest
a way to implement their solution code.

... if you are NOT technical you should STFU!


I'm not sure if your vitriol was meant against us Developers/People who
do code/work on SeaMonkey in our free time.


I think the post is directed at those who complain about
features/bugs not fixed and the post was to suggest that
they add some constructive criticism in the form of
'code'.

IOW, if you don't know how to fix the darn bugs, find ways
of helping or STFU.

That's my take of the post.

Edmund


The percentage of folks even CAPABLE of coding has to be quite small, in 
comparison to the total lot of SM users, so your sophomoric response is 
unacceptable.


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Unwanted tab opening from hyperlink in e-mail

2011-07-23 Thread Keith Whaley

Michael Gordon wrote:

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:

Hallo. I have just upgraded to Seamonkey V2.2, and for
the first time, have encountered a change behaviour which
is both unexpected and unwanted. In all previous versions,
clicking on an http: hyperlink in an e-mail message caused a
new browser window to open; now, in V2.2, a new tab opens
instead. I do not use tabs, do not like tabs, but can
find nothing under Edit/Preferences that will allow me
to restore this behaviour to its previous form. I would
be very grateful if someone could advise me how to undo
this unwanted change, short of reverting back to an earlier
version of Seamonkey.

Many thanks in advance :
Philip Taylor



Try going to Edit/Preferences/Browser/Tabbed Browsing. Uncheck what
you do not want.


That advise applies if you use a PC; if you use a Mac version of SM, the 
route becomes SeaMonkey/Preferences/Browser/Tabbed Browsing.


I think the choices given will satisfy all needs.


Even though this is a browser setting and you are posting about e-mail,
when you click on a link in a message it opens your web browser.

Michael G


True. Thanks for the post, Michael.

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click Paste as quotation gone ?

2011-07-26 Thread Keith Whaley

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:

I used reply/all; if I don't, it goes only to you.
** Phil.




Daniel wrote:


Philip, why did you reply to the newsgroup *AND* to me via email?
There is no need and only wastes my available email allowance!!


True. So is Daniel's well-made point. If the message is pertinent to and 
addressed to the group, it makes little sense to address it to all.
If you address your response to Daniel as WELL as the entire group, it 
looks like you're making a point - to the list membership - of Daniel's 
getting HIS own copy...for whatever reason.


Your response will contain Daniel's name at the top of your return 
message as a contributor, but now he gets TWO messages, and as he says, 
not only did he get double what everyone else gets, but it negatively 
affects his email allowance.


He's merely asking for a little consideration.

Every time I send a response to a message on this group, I need special 
care that I don't end up sending my response to ONLY the person who 
posted his message last.

That makes very little sense.
If I'm reading messages in a Special Interest LIST, any response should 
GO to the list. But not THIS list.


One's normal intention when choosing Reply is to add your personal 
comment to the subject matter on the LIST, not only the last person 
entering his opinion ~ but that's how this list has been set up.


JMMHO,

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click Paste as quotation gone ?

2011-07-26 Thread Keith Whaley

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



Keith Whaley wrote:

more than I feel comfortable citing

So what is your point, Keith ?


Fair enough, Phillip. See below, please. I am assuming you meant thes 
line items as questions, not statements? I ask, because you had NO 
punctuation following the last word in each sentence. I've constructed 
my reply as tho' you meant these to be questions.



1) I am using e-mail inappropriately (in this context)


Perhaps. In that there is virtually no need to send a separate email to 
Daniel's specific email address, as WELL as the list. Not only that but 
it works a hardship on him.
If there's no rational reason to send him a personal email as well, why 
do so? Just because it's habit to hit Reply All?


I think the reason you and others do this is because there's no choice 
of Reply To List. IMMHO that should be the default. In place of 
Reply sending an email to the poster of that message.


When I put my mouse cursor over Reply it specifically says Reply to 
the message. If it actually _did_ that, that would be ideal, but it 
doesn't. It replies to the last poster, PERSONALLY.

That's not what it says it was meant to do.
That is simply wrong, IMO.


2) The list is inappropriately configured


I've said that for some time now. This list is not alone in being 
inappropriately configured with respect to sending an answer to a 
message. I figured out a long time ago how to circumvent that niggling 
little problem, but the fact that it's inconvenient and illogically 
constructed is still true.



3) Seamonkey is not correctly following RFC-822


I'm aware of RFC-822, but am not enough familiar with the specific areas 
to quote section and paragraph.
I realize none of this is malicious, or even terribly important in the 
overall scheme of things, but to ignore a user's angst over his 
ratcheting email costs is kinda cold, don'tcha think?



4) Daniel is unreasonable in his expectations


No, in my opinion he isn't.


5) Something else ?


Nossir, not at all. No hidden or unrevealed message.
If number one had been properly addressed, there would be no need for 
all this palaver in the first place!



Philip Taylor



Best to one and all.

keith whaley said with a calm smile


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.2 e-mail client : where has right=click Paste as quotation gone ?

2011-07-28 Thread Keith Whaley

Daniel wrote:

Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



S. Beaulieu wrote:

if you simply deleted his address from the reply field (rather than
editing it to deobfuscate it), it would be less work for you and nicer
to him (or anyone else).

Already incorporated into my standard working practice for
this list. It takes a chap a little while to get up to speed,
don't you know ? :-)



Hey, Philip, is there a particular reason why you use the mail list?? Is
it just that you were unaware that you could get all these posts any
other way??

If it's just because you don't know how, askthere are any number of
people here that could advise you how to get to the newsgroup directly.
Then you could pick and choose which posts you read, rather than getting
each and every one delivered to your mail box.


Just out of ornery curiosity, why is it so many folks who regularly (and 
preferentially?) attend the newsgroup version of this list get so bent 
out of shape over those of us who, for whatever reason, prefer and use 
the mail method of message delivery for the very same list?
I just read that there is some sort of reciprocity between the mail and 
newsgroups anyhow, so that posting to one gets to the other ANYhow, 
so...what's the big deal?


keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is a step backwards

2011-08-07 Thread Keith Whaley

Ray_Net wrote:

Don wrote:

Clearly Seamonkey 2.2 is a step backward.


[...]


Is there any simple way to go back to an earlier version and still
keep my bookmarks, settings, emails etc.?

Also how do I write the people who wrote this version to complain.
Not just to report a bug. (this version IS a bug.)



No. You must accept the developers dreams ... they are not paid, so they
can do what they want.


A commonly-stated incorrect-ism.

While the developers may not receive any remuneration for what they do, 
they ARE employed. And as such, that 'team' must follow the direction(s) 
set down by those in charge, who (presumably) have a direction they have 
planned to follow, to attain whatever mutual goals have been established.


All moving vehicles or groups need a goal and a direction.

Do/go where they want? I don't think so... The SM team is not a 
reincantation of the Keystone Kops.


keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: new 2.3 - Firefox updates too often

2011-08-11 Thread Keith Whaley

MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 10/08/2011 16:45, Justin Wood (Callek) told the
world:

PhillipJones wrote:


[...]

I strongly suspect he wasn't interviewed by CNN, and in the end, he 
didn't email the world. All he did was to email somebody on this list. 
Somewhat complicated at times, but hardly as earthshakingly important as 
suggested.


keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Which Windows monospaced is recommended for message such as these ?

2011-09-07 Thread Keith Whaley

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 9/7/2011 3:14 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:


Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:


“Check for Updates…”


which comes out on my screen as [0093]Check for Updates[0094].
Is there a recommended Windows monospaced font which can
correctly handle these paired quotes and other less common
Unicode characters ?




Actually its broken on my screen as well, (a bad artifact from my web
post). I usually avoid unicode if I can help it in text/plain
e-mails/news postings unless there is a strong need.

It could be an issue on my end, or with our defaults in news, not sure
which. But I can assure you I don't plan on sending it like that again.


Justin, if you can find or take the time to explain why you don't like 
Unicode, it would help many of us who don't have a CLUE as to why not!


I started using Unicode some while back, when I found a lot of oddities 
in portraying one or another glyph could be SOLVED by switching from my 
usual Western (ISO 8859-1) to Unicode (UTF-8).


Now you tell me you strongly avoid Unicode. I'd really like to know why.

Also, what encoding scheme DO you use in lieu of?

keith whaley
Mac OS 10.6.8
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Acrobat / Reader question

2011-09-07 Thread Keith Whaley

Ray_Net wrote:

WLS wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

WLS wrote:

JeffM wrote:

PhillipJones wrote:

Adobe absolutely refuses to support Gecko based Browsers on Mac.
[...][It's] webkit only. Perhaps we should switch to webkit .



...or perhaps to Linux.



My votes for Linux :)



Let people to use the OS they want/prefer !



I do let people use the OS they want/prefer.

Fortunately Mozilla isn't going to abandon Gecko for WebKit, so if
someone wants to use Adobe Reader with Mac they are out of luck.

I still vote for Linux.



Gecko and Webkit are not OS.
I still vote for Windows.


To do what? Everybody knows Mac is superior. Sighh.

keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Which Windows monospaced is recommended for message such as these ?

2011-09-08 Thread Keith Whaley

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 9/7/2011 11:38 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 9/7/2011 3:14 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:


Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:


“Check for Updates…”



which comes out on my screen as [0093]Check for Updates[0094].
Is there a recommended Windows monospaced font which can
correctly handle these paired quotes and other less common
Unicode characters ?




Actually its broken on my screen as well, (a bad artifact from my web
post). I usually avoid unicode if I can help it in text/plain
e-mails/news postings unless there is a strong need.

It could be an issue on my end, or with our defaults in news, not sure
which. But I can assure you I don't plan on sending it like that again.



[snipped]


Now you tell me you strongly avoid Unicode. I'd really like to know why.
Also, what encoding scheme DO you use in lieu of?



Mostly just a personal preference. My general (US based) contacts that I
know personally have typically not had good results when I send unicode
chars. Also, my keyboard does not make it easy for me to type unicode
chars.

I usually stick with ASCII in e-mails for that reason. Also I'm not too
familiar with dealing with encoding schemes as I would like. When I do
chose an encoding scheme, I usually choose UTF-8 (BOM or not depends on
context).

I have nothing against unicode, just that I experience too much font
issues when *I* use it outside of dev. These issues are usually
avoidable easily by simply not using Unicode.

Hope that helps


It does. I'll add one more comment.

In the site:  http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html

The following quote appears:

The UTF-8 encoding defined in ISO 10646-1:2000 Annex D and also 
described in RFC 3629 as well as section 3.9 of the Unicode 4.0 standard 
does not have these problems. It is clearly the way to go for using 
Unicode under Unix-style operating systems.


My guess is that since I work with Mac OS 10, which is UNIX based, 
that's why I find it compatible for my use.


I'll also guess you use a Windows OS, and that is not UNIX based, which 
is one reason why you dislike how UTF-8 treats your efforts.

Not sure, but possible...

keith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Moving a folder?

2011-10-07 Thread Keith Whaley
I want to rearrange the position of some folders that are subfolders in 
my Inbox folder.


I just upgraded to SM 2.4.1 and love it, but...there are some oddities 
that cropped up so I am trying to rearrange things as I like them. This 
is one of them.


Thanks,

keith whaley

Mac OS 10.6.8
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


changing folder sequence

2011-10-08 Thread Keith Whaley

I have several folders under my Inbox folder.
Since I upgraded from 2.0.14, to 2.4.1, some of my folders have changed 
position. I don't like that.

I want to switch them back to the old order.

I tried Click-Control, -Option and -Command. None of which work.

Who can tell me how to move a folder to a different place in the sequence?

SM 2.4.1
Mac OS 10.6.8

Thanks,  keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Towards an alternative way forward for Seamonkey

2011-10-09 Thread Keith Whaley

Excellent analogy, Sir Phillip!  :-)
Pertinent, accurate and most amusing all at the same time.
Thanks,
keith whaley


Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:



MCBastos wrote:


To draw a very simple parallel, there's very little haste and stress
involved in getting on the subway to travel cross-town... because if I
miss this train, there will be another a few minutes later, and you can
get on it with minimum effort and little lost time. Getting on a plane,
OTOH, involves quite a lot of worry and rushing around, because if I
miss the plane, there might take hours to get on another one, with
considerable annoyance, expenses and lost time.



Well, let's explore your metaphor further -- let's say you were used
to catching the 20:14, which stopped everywhere you wanted it to,
didn't stop at strange, out-of-the-way, stations, was reliable,
punctual and got you to the office on time. Then the 20:14 was
cancelled (well, not really cancelled, but all the station staff
told you that it wasn't really safe any more, even though it was
exactly the same train you had been using for months), and they
really thought that you should start taking the 22:00 instead.
So you did what they recommended, and strange things started to
happen; it no longer stopped everywhere it used to, stopped at
strange, out-of-the-way stations that no-one had ever heard of,
your luggage would frequently disappear without trace, you
were automatically sat alongside a bunch of other folk you'd
never seen before instead of having a carriage to yourself,
and various other oddities occurred that forced you to wonder
what exactly was so wrong with the good old 20:14. And then
the 22:00 was cancelled, and replaced by the 23:00, which had
its own set of quirks, and then there was the 24:00 and the 24:10
which replaced it shortly afterwards, and all the staff kept
assuring you that this regular change of timetable was in
everyone's interest, and they didn't mind working their @rses
off so that new timetables could be published every six weeks,
and so on.

And then someone had a brainwave -- look, he said, just because
the rail network keeps introducing new trains doesn't mean that
we commuters have to follow suit; why don't we just agree amongst
ourselves that /our/ timetable will change only every six months ?
Sure there'll be trains that are faster than ours, painted in
prettier, more psychedelic colours, with go-faster stripes and
all the bells and whistles you could possibly ask for, but our
trains will have one great advantage : we will have dry-run them
for a minimum of three months before we let a single commuter loose
on them; they'll be thoroughly way-tested by our dedicated band
of better-testers (as we call them in the rail trade), we'll
make sure that all the rough edges to the seats that were there
when they left the factory have been removed, we'll make sure
that the train stops where /our/ passengers want it to stop,
and that it sails through those crazy stations that the rail
network think it ought to, and so on.

Now wouldn't you, Mr Bastos, think twice before willingly agree
to catch a different train every six weeks, and wouldn't you
perhaps prefer to catch a slightly slower train in the the sure
and certain knowledge that it would be /reliable/, would manifest
no unexpected behaviour, and even if it wasn't 100% bullet-proof
against the latest weapons of micro-destruction (WMDs, as they
are called in the trade, or Viruses and Trojan Horses, as it
is rumoured they were once known), there was still a 99.999%
probability that you would arrive safely, particularly because
you long ago invested in some good, modern, anti-WMD protection
that made sure that your train would almost never encounter those
WMDs in the first place ?

The defence rests, m'lud.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: changing folder sequence

2011-10-09 Thread Keith Whaley

Keith Whaley wrote:

MCBastos wrote:

On 08/10/2011 20:53, Keith Whaley told the world:

I have several folders under my Inbox folder.
Since I upgraded from 2.0.14, to 2.4.1, some of my folders have changed
position. I don't like that.
I want to switch them back to the old order.

Who can tell me how to move a folder to a different place in the
sequence?

SM 2.4.1
Mac OS 10.6.8

Thanks, keith whaley



Try using the Folderpane Tools extension:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/seamonkey/addon/folderpane-tools/


 Thanks, MC

 keith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Incidental info

2011-10-13 Thread Keith Whaley

I have an iMac using OS 10.6.8

I just moved from SeaMonkey 2.0.14 to 2.4.1. In one fell swoop.

I felt it was a risk on my part, but...it was totally trouble free and 
without problems. I think it important that everybody knows that.


The windows seem 'crisper', brighter and load in seconds. Frequently as 
little as TWO. Big change.


I feel I owe those who compiled this version and did such a super job, 
and I wanted to thank them publicly.


Thanks, guys!!!

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Editing an unsent message

2011-10-23 Thread Keith Whaley

MontgomeryMARQUITA32 wrote:

If you're in not good state and have no cash to go out from that, you
would require to take thea
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/credit-loans;credit
loans/a. Because that will aid you for sure. I take student loan
every year and feel myself good because of it.



This is NOT an appropriate message for the list, and doesn't follow the 
Subject line.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Archive folder?

2012-01-06 Thread Keith Whaley

I use a Mac and am operating from OS 10.6.8.

I also use SeaMonkey v.2.5.

The other day I noticed a new folder in my SM lineup called Archives.

What caused that to show up? Was it part of v.2.5 SM and I never noticed 
it until now?


From time to time, I notice new messages in there, in sub-folders 
titled 2011 or 2012. I don't recall setting up rules to move messages there.

What's going on, please?

Thanks,  keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: a very big conveniance [cLEK FUDE, CHECK IT OUT]

2012-01-07 Thread Keith Whaley

Michael Gordon wrote:

[...]


KM,

My personal opinion, try it out sometime.

It is far easier to print any document to a .pdf file and attach the
file to an e-mail message.

FAX transmissions are on the way out for the majority of users.
1. You need a dedicated phone line.
2. You need to know if the recipient can receive FAX transmissions.
3. If your recipient is not in your local calling area you pay long
distance fees for the length of time it takes to send 500Kb FAX, at
96Kb/sec. to the recipient.

E-mail attachments of a 500Kb PDF file transfer in Microseconds.

Michael G


Thanks, Michael.

I read your message to my wife, and 20 minutes of dialog later (!) I
turned off my beloved Brother all-in-one fax/copy/phone machine, for the 
first time in a VERY long time!


Sighhh.

I recognize you're right, so...we'll try it. For a while.  :-D

I suspect all we'll REALLY miss is, the regular American Airlines and 
other such travel agencies' gratuitous offers twice weekly.  grin


I also suspect that once we figure out we really do NOT need a fax 
machine any longer, we'll get rid of the extra phone line! Now that will 
be a savings. More beer for Dad!  g


keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Archive folder?

2012-01-09 Thread Keith Whaley

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 12-01-07 8:54 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 01/06/2012 01:47 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:


I never did this, but Shift-A is such a common keystroke combination
that I can't believe any competent designer would use it for a specific
function.

I see that all my accounts are set to create archives, which is
disturbing because I used to have folders by that name, with contents,
and they're gone!



That sounds like a critical bug. Have you filed a bug report?



For Thunderbird, the plan is to provide some sort of notification when
you first use the archive shortcut.
See https://bug511741.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=528851
I assume that would be adopted by SeaMonkey. But I'm just assuming.

However, that isn't because Shift-A is considered a common
keystroke. It's because the shortcut in Thunderbird and Mac versions of
SeaMonkey is just A. And /that/ is too easy to hit unintentionally. :)

When it was implemented in SeaMonkey, Shift-A was chosen instead,
but for some reason, the Mac version was kept at A. And Keith Whaley
(the person who started this thread) is on Mac.


Hi Chris.

Not sure what you're saying. My Mac shows the Archive command under the 
menu bar item Message drop-down and it's Shift-A. Oh, I'm using SM 
v.2.5.


keith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Key press delay

2012-02-25 Thread Keith Whaley

Mac OS 10.6.8
iMac 7,1 Fall 2007
SM 2.7.2

When I'm typing a message, either in answer to someone else's post or an 
original for me to post to the list, I frequently find the appearance of 
the letters on the screen lag the pressing of the keyboard keys by as 
much as 3 seconds.


If I ignore that and keep typing, eventually the words will appear, but 
not smoothly, as in a word processor.


I merely want to know why that is. Suggestions welcome.

As one might guess, it hasn't happened to THIS post yet. Go figure...

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


List message icons

2012-03-10 Thread Keith Whaley

I use SM v.2.7.2, Intel Mac OSX 10.6.8

I've tried to find some online info on list message icons, but can't 
locate it.


My questions are simple.

In the Subject listings pane/section, each post shows an envelope icon 
before the message's Title.


Some envelopes are plain, some have a superimposed downward-pointing 
green arrow on the flap, and some have a left-facing orange arrow 
superimposed on the envelope's left side.


It's not intuitive as to what those icons mean, and I can find noplace 
to read about it.


Thanks,

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Missing paper clip if attachment file is a .zip

2012-04-05 Thread Keith Whaley

Ed Mullen wrote:

Michael Gordon wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Ray_Net wrote, On 04/04/2012 23:03:

In the sent folder (i have not tested in the inbox folder) presence of
an attachement is displayed by then image of a paper clip.
But when the attached file is a .zip one, the image is missing 
Is this another bug of SM or a feature invented by the developpers ?

I should also add the fact that i did not see the attachment in a window
located right of the headers. So no way to retrieve it by doing a save
attachment.



Ray,

This smacks of invention by the developers, because no one is supposed
to send .zip attachments. They may carry bugs.

Michael G




Geez. http://www.armadilloweb.com/

Horrible contrast choices. Give me some contrast, ok? Sheesh, blue on
blue, awful. Can't read it. It's just horrible, visually. Can't get past
the visual to the content. And I am actually interested in Austin
stuff. This is horrible.


Ed, I agree with you.
Especially the left side menu items.
In the first place, black on dark blue is a difficult read all by 
itself, but when you do a mouse-over, the text in the menu items changes 
to white text on a light blue bar. Almost totally unreadable.


keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM 2.9.1 additions?

2012-05-06 Thread Keith Whaley
I've noticed a new icon that occasionally occurs in the message's 
Subject header, a pencil that is pointed at 45 deg. off the vertical, 
pointed downward, either whole or broken in the middle, still pointed 
downward.


It seems to have occurred coincident with the automatic download of SM 
2.9.1.


Anybody have an idea what it is supposed to portray?

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Question about BEING unsubscribed

2012-06-04 Thread Keith Whaley
I just received a message from the 
support-seamonkey-bun...@lists.mozilla.org with the titie:  You have 
been unsubscribed from the support-seamonkey mailing list.


My questions are, by whom and for what reason?

keith whaley
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


IO want t oknow what action has been taken

2012-06-04 Thread Keith Whaley
...regarding my deletion from the list? I did nothing knowingly to cause 
problems anywhere.


keith whaley - Support-seamonkey list member for a long time.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM preferences not obeying...

2010-07-20 Thread Keith Whaley
I have set my SM 1.1.18 (Mac) preferences to only display fonts in character 
encoding Unicode (UTF-8).
Instead, it still insists on frequently moving over to Western (ISO-8859-1), 
which doesn’t handle punctuation correctly.


Does anyone know why the user settings are ignored?

I‘ve tried restarting, rebooting, etc. Doesn’t seem to help.

Thanks,

keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


URL links not active?

2010-08-12 Thread Keith Whaley
I have noticed that on occasion URL addresses that appear in list or 
newsgroup messages, that start with http:// do not show up as an active 
link. In other words, they do not appear/display in my posted message 
underlined, of a different color, and are NOT clickable.


It doesn’t seem to be limited to URLs that are inserted in other folks’ 
messages or whether I had inserted them in my messages. So far, I haven’t 
discovered a commonality between active and non-active links.


Why might that be?

keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Help?

2010-08-13 Thread Keith Whaley

NoOp wrote:

On 08/12/2010 06:32 PM, Harold Robbins wrote:
I keep getting mail in the list, but I cannot see my Email nor get replies. 
WHere do I go for help in SeaMonkey ?



Use the newsgroups instead:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/community
  news://news.mozilla.org/mozilla.support.seamonkey



--
Harold Robbins


Excuse me folks, but...of what possible use is the list @
   support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
...if one must use the newsgroup in order to get answers to legitimate SM 
questions?


keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SeaMonkey Help?

2010-08-14 Thread Keith Whaley

d...@kd4e.com wrote:

Keith,

Your posts are making it here fine, go ahead and ask your
question, please?

If you are not seeing your posts, check your Junk folder.

HTH ...


Okay, thanks Doc but...I wasn't personally having any problems, I was 
referring to the  valid lament Harold Robbins posted on 8/12, which is 
copied below.
When NoOp's answer to Harold was that if he was not seeing messages he 
posted actually show up, he should send his inquiry to the newsgroup 
INSTEAD, I merely asked the next most logical question.


I still ask: why instead?
Why isn't sending any SeaMonkey help questions to the support-seamonkey 
Yahoo list adequate?


keith



NoOp wrote:

On 08/12/2010 06:32 PM, Harold Robbins wrote:

I keep getting mail in the list, but I cannot see my Email nor get
replies. WHere do I go for help in SeaMonkey ?



Use the newsgroups instead:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/community
news://news.mozilla.org/mozilla.support.seamonkey



--
Harold Robbins



Excuse me folks, but...of what possible use is the list @
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
...if one must use the newsgroup in order to get answers to legitimate
SM questions?

keith whaley




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: URL links not active?

2010-08-15 Thread Keith Whaley

Beverly Howard wrote:

keith whaley wrote:


 I have noticed that on occasion URL addresses that appear in list or
newsgroup messages, that start with http:// do not show up as an active
link. In other words, they do not appear/display in my posted message
underlined, of a different color, and are NOT clickable.



What is the message window for this group's view message body as set to?

Assuming it's set to one of the two html options, set it to plain text 
and see if the link activates.


Best advice I've received yet. In other words, that works. Problem solved.

I suspect that since most messages here are in plain text and their urls 
convert to links, but that the messages that show this behavior are in 
html format and have only the link text and no associated link created 
for the text.


Beverly Howard


I have a couple posters who ALWAYS send links that aren't links.
On reflection, I'm almost certain they also always send in html.
That will be proof of the pudding, and an easy way to retrieve the info they 
want me to see...


Many thanks,

keith whaley


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: What Command Line Option for SeaMonkey to load mail also?

2010-09-06 Thread Keith Whaley

Keith Whaley wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

What is the command line option can I put in my Desktop Icon such
that SeaMonkey Browser AND Mail load up ?

Right now I have to click the Mail Icon after the Browser loads up.

DoctorBill




If I’m in Mail  Newsgroups, I get to the Browser by clicking 
WindowNavigator.

The converse is true.

Why would you want both loaded at once? You can’t get them to display 
simultaneously, nor would you want to...


So, I guess I don’t really understand your question.

I guess you should define “Load Up.”

keith




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


SM 2.0.8 question

2010-09-16 Thread Keith Whaley

I use SM 1.1.18 for the Mac.
Is the translation to SM 2.0.8 as simple as downloading it and installing it?
Have the makers and providers provided for as simple an installation as 
that, or ... heaven’s forbid ... one must effect the move in stages and with 
attendant file manipulations.


 ?

Thanks for any insight. I’d like to make the move, but at MY advanced age 
:-) I’m not all that swift anymore, and usually opt for the simpler way forward.


keith whaley

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: SM 2.0.8 question

2010-09-17 Thread Keith Whaley

Leonidas Jones wrote:

Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:

I use SM 1.1.18 for the Mac.
Is the translation to SM 2.0.8 as simple as downloading it and
installing it?
Have the makers and providers provided for as simple an installation
as that, or ... heaven forbid .. one must effect the move in stages
 and with attendant file manipulations.

 ?

Thanks for any insight. Id like to make the move, but at MY advanced
age I‘m not all that swift anymore, and usually opt for the simpler

way forward.

keith whaley



Before any answer, what version of the OS are you running?  SeaMonkey
2.x will not run on Panther, for example.

Lee


Mac OS 10.6.4.

keith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


  1   2   >