Daniel wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
JR WG wrote ...
And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)
No, not really, except that it may influence where SM browser goes.
Daniel
I certainly read that as you contradicting yourself.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
JR WG wrote ...
And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)
No, not really, except that it may influence where SM browser goes.
Daniel
I certainly read that as you contradicting yourself.
Yeah!! Now that
JR WG wrote:
Exactly the reason that I left the original memo, that Firefox 3.5 RC1
was out in the wild.
Hopefully, this means that SM 2, an obviously even better idea
browser-and-then-some, is ever nearing its own introduction.
This doesn't affect SeaMonkey 2.0 at all, as the problem is
, in order
to see SM 2 draw nearer.
Joe
- Original Message ---
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:00:48 +1000
From: Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au
To: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5 RC1 is appearing
Message-ID: inedntiszqkr_6bxnz2dnuvz_jji4...@mozilla.org
Daniel wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
JR WG wrote ...
And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)
No, not really, except that it may influence where SM browser goes.
Daniel
I certainly read that as you contradicting yourself.
Appears that Firefox 3.5 RC1 is itself appearing, but with reletively little
fanfare and pronouncements from Mozilla HQ.
For something that's been waylaid for this long, the RC1 is a relief, indeed,
seen mostly in English but we should be seeing other world languages as well.
Various locales
JR WG wrote ...
A lot of unnecessary baggage
If you must top post THINK !
And are we really interested in what 'the opposition' are doing :)
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services -
7 matches
Mail list logo
