WLS wrote:
On 07/16/2012 11:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
WLS wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and
Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part
On 7/16/2012 7:20 AM PT, Daniel typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
to
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory
WLS wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be
On 07/15/2012 02:55 PM, Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be
On 07/16/2012 11:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
WLS wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!
Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should
Hi again!
Is anyone else noticing v2.10.1 uses a lot more memory than v2.0.14 and
earlier? I saw my new SM installation and profile went high as 1.5-1.6
(peak) GB in my old, updated 32-bit Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine (2.5 GB
of RAM). This was I surfing, watching videos, using tabs, etc. a
Ant wrote:
Hi again!
Is anyone else noticing v2.10.1 uses a lot more memory than v2.0.14 and
earlier? I saw my new SM installation and profile went high as 1.5-1.6
(peak) GB in my old, updated 32-bit Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine (2.5 GB
of RAM). This was I surfing, watching videos, using
Ant wrote:
I closed a bunch to avoid the sensitive ones and memory usages went down
a bit. Must be too many tabs/web pages I guess? ;)
Yes, my skim of that memory dump doesn't turn anything too extravagant
up other than just a large number of pages/windows/tabs open.
The largest noteworthy
On 7/15/2012 3:05 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
I closed a bunch to avoid the sensitive ones and memory usages went down
a bit. Must be too many tabs/web pages I guess? ;)
Yes, my skim of that memory dump doesn't turn anything too extravagant
up other than just a large number of
11 matches
Mail list logo
