Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-08 Thread RGrannus
David Wilkinson wrote: MikeyG wrote: What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available? Death by a thousand (incompatibility) cuts :-). For me

Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread MikeyG
What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available? Wouldn't security issues be addressed by programs such as, oh, ZoneAlarm Security Suite, let's

Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread David Wilkinson
MikeyG wrote: What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available? Death by a thousand (incompatibility) cuts :-). For me the overriding reasons

Re: Returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8

2010-01-06 Thread Martin Freitag
MikeyG schrieb: What would be the long term consequences be from returning to SeaMonkey 1.1.8, and continuing to use it until a user friendly Form Manager, as user friendly as that of SeaMonkey 1.1.8, is available? Why don't you at last use 1.1.18 which is the most secure 1.1.x version