Jens Hatlak wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Let's just hope someone will come up with some sort of migration tool
extension.
In what bug the ability was removed?
The ability to import the old download history format was removed with:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472924
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Update: They just removed the ability to import the old form history format:
Probably doesn't touch us much, as we didn't import form history from
1.x in any case, from all I know.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing
John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: Then, you start, by explaining how, on earth, does one
migrate ones Addressbooks intact to SM2, in detail, PLEASE!???
First, it would probably be better to start a new thread for this, as it
becomes hard to find buried in that quite badly named thread it's
NoOp wrote:
On 12/11/2009 08:10 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: I have to laugh because you finally made a funny but
not really sarcastic joke! I spent 21 years in the Army,
I'll only say this once:
Stop.
Nobody cares that you spent 21 years in the Army (I spent over
On 12/12/2009 07:13 PM, John Boyle wrote:
..
To NoOp: STOP YOURSELF: I finally say something reasonable and , I must
say very personal, and you want to go off in a tangent! It so happens I
have a BSM, myself and a few others besides: I only mentioned that and
other parts of the statement
John Boyle wrote:
I have been a LOYAL user of Netscape/SeaMonkey since Netscape
4, which I made clear in one of my messages!
That doesn't change that you are a destructive voice now, apparently,
and accusing the people of only bad things who are in fact donating a
whole lot of their free
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/10/2009 4:31 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Why did you install programs into 'Documents and Settings' ???
Program Files IS the directory where programs must be installed.
Programs certainly don't have to be installed in Program Files.
Why someone would install anything in
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/11/2009 7:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/10/2009 4:31 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
/snip/
I find it hard to believe that any user would install SeaMonkey (or
any program for that matter) directly into C:/Documents And Settings
rather than a sub-directory under
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/11/2009 7:09 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/10/2009 4:31 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
/snip/
I find it hard to believe that any user would install SeaMonkey (or
any program for that matter) directly into C:/Documents And Settings
rather
Robert Kaiser wrote:
It's an interesting world where everyone but yourself is losing his/her
mind and have a disease, right?
Robert Kaiser
My Dad used to tell a story about a mother watching her son's army
regiment march by, and saying proudly to her neighbor, Look, everyone
is out of step
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
I have been a LOYAL user of Netscape/SeaMonkey since Netscape
4, which I made clear in one of my messages!
That doesn't change that you are a destructive voice now, apparently,
and accusing the people of only bad things who are in fact donating a
whole
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
you just seem to be as Imperial Minded as
the Kaiser was in WWI!
Right, that's why he had already introduced UK-style democracy in
mostz parts of his monarchy.
Interestingly, you haven't understood yet that joking on someone's
name will not make him
On 12/11/2009 08:10 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: I have to laugh because you finally made a funny but
not really sarcastic joke! I spent 21 years in the Army,
I'll only say this once:
Stop.
Nobody cares that you spent 21 years in the Army (I spent over 10 years
in the US Army and
Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:30:19 -0600, John wrote:
Water off a Ducks back. I am wondering if it is because I have SM
installed in Documents and Settings?
Ah well, if the iTunes database also lives in Documents and Settings,
installing SeaMonkey (or Firefox, or Thunderbird,
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
I will then have to switch to IE, HEAVEN
FORBID! You see, IE is already paid for as part of my OS,
John, if you are set in wanting to move away from SeaMonkey, why do you
want to go all the
John Boyle wrote:
you just seem to be as Imperial Minded as
the Kaiser was in WWI!
Right, that's why he had already introduced UK-style democracy in mostz
parts of his monarchy.
Interestingly, you haven't understood yet that joking on someone's name
will not make him like you better,
John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: Seems you are infected with the same disease as Robert
Kaiser!
It's an interesting world where everyone but yourself is losing his/her
mind and have a disease, right?
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Daniel wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
I will then have to switch to IE, HEAVEN
FORBID! You see, IE is already paid for as part of my OS,
John, if you are set in wanting to move away from SeaMonkey, why do you
want to
On 12/10/2009 6:36 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Daniel wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
I will then have to switch to IE, HEAVEN
FORBID! You see, IE is already paid for as part of my OS,
John, if you are set in wanting to
this thread, and is the one that proclaimed that SeaMonkey 2.0
is JUNK.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
conveniently mistake John Boyle for Bush, who
created this thread, and is the one that proclaimed that SeaMonkey 2.0
is JUNK.
Actually, John Boyle said:
I did NOT originate the title of the thread, Version 2.0 is JUNK,
if you bother to even check that FACT, but I CLEARLY agree with that
statement
John wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
I think that I have stated my case accurately. You all may want to
On 12/10/2009 4:31 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Why did you install programs into 'Documents and Settings' ???
Program Files IS the directory where programs must be installed.
Programs certainly don't have to be installed in Program Files.
Why someone would install anything in Documents And Settings is
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: Seems you are infected with the same disease as Robert
Kaiser!
It's an interesting world where everyone but yourself is losing
his/her mind and have a disease, right?
Robert Kaiser
___
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
So, while migrating your address book from your SM 1.1.X profile to
SM 2.0, it destroyed your address book in your SM 1.1.X profile?
To Mark Hansen: YES, exactly!
There is absolutely no single piece of code in SeaMonkey 2.0 that would
be able to do that
John Boyle wrote:
Enough for now! :-( :-\
I couldn't agree more. I can do nothing against your bad health or you
regrading yourself as a low-life being as you seem to suggest in
multiple of your posts here.
Try to be friendly and constructive instead of negative, arrogant and
sarcastic (I
NoOp wrote:
On 12/08/2009 02:45 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 8/12/2009 13:30, John told the world:
Water off a Ducks back. I am wondering if it is because I have SM
installed in Documents and Settings? Perhaps I should try Program Files.
The interesting thing is though when SM2
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
I think that I have stated my case accurately. You all may want to
refuse to believe that the install of SM2
On 12/9/2009 5:32 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Enough for now! :-( :-\
I couldn't agree more. I can do nothing against your bad health or you
regrading yourself as a low-life being as you seem to suggest in
multiple of your posts here.
Try to be friendly and constructive
John Boyle a écrit :
I do NOT and
NEVER will respond well to ARROGANCE, SARCASM or anything else that
smacks of that kind of attitude!
I think you need to look in a mirror.
S.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to start a new thread (perhaps: SM2.0 + lost
On 12/09/2009 08:54 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to start
NoOp wrote:
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to start a new thread (perhaps: SM2.0 +
NoOp wrote:
On 12/09/2009 08:54 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/09/2009 06:31 AM, John wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
So John are you the same Rick from that thread?
pawall...@gmail.com
My guess is you are.
no
Ah. Then there are two of you that have lost itunes files. Perhaps it
might be a good idea to
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
I think that I have stated my case accurately. You all may want to
refuse to believe that the
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
So, while migrating your address book from your SM 1.1.X profile to
SM 2.0, it destroyed your address book in your SM 1.1.X profile?
To Mark Hansen: YES, exactly!
There is absolutely no single piece of code in SeaMonkey 2.0 that
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Enough for now! :-( :-\
I couldn't agree more. I can do nothing against your bad health or you
regrading yourself as a low-life being as you seem to suggest in
multiple of your posts here.
Try to be friendly and constructive instead of negative,
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/9/2009 5:32 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Enough for now! :-( :-\
I couldn't agree more. I can do nothing against your bad health or you
regrading yourself as a low-life being as you seem to suggest in
multiple of your posts here.
John wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Hello John, You complain, complain, but never answer usefull questions.
One of those is:
NoOp wrote:
So, despite the 'directory/folder' debate; John please tell
us *exactly* where you have SeaMonkey installed, where you
have your itunes etc installed.
On 12/9/2009 7:37 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: Seems you are infected with the same disease as Robert
Kaiser! When is the last time you gave complete, clearcut instructions
on how to overcome the failings of SM2? From what I have read on this
list or the newsgroup, you seem to think
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:20:41 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote:
I imagine the functionality had been in plac e back in the pre FF1.0
days, when they did a similar move of the profile location ( to much
gnashing of teeth, I might add). Clearly, there is no need for it in
Firefox anymore, so I can
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:08:12 -0600, John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
All I can say is that I tried several times to install 2.0 over 1.1.18
and it corrupted my iTunes file and would not open. That would suggest
that there is a problem moving between the two.
What does iTunes
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:08:12 -0600, Lou wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After
On 08.12.2009 10:51, Philip Chee wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:08:12 -0600, Lou wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR
Lou wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL the complaints that
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
snip
I run iTunes on Windows and Mac's, and SeaMonkey 2.0, now the 2.01 beta,
and have noticed anything like this. Work with us, maybe we can help.
Lee
Lee, I hope you meant
On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip, I see nothing like this in the tools menu item in SM 2.
You can
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 5:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
So if no one can suggest an alternative, that means it was SM's
fault?
Sir, once again, your logic escapes me.
Daniel wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 5:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
So if no one can suggest an alternative, that means it was SM's
fault?
Sir, once again, your logic
John Boyle wrote:
[...]
All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!
John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps are
annoying!
keith whaley
___
Tobias Fischer wrote:
On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip, I see nothing like this in the tools menu
On 08.12.2009 13:24, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Tobias Fischer wrote:
On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip,
Philip Chee wrote:
Oops. Perhaps I should be clearer. The code removed was the ability to
read and hence migrate the old (mork) History format.
That's wrong. Sorry, but the browsing history still can be read in 1.9.2
from all I know. Only download history can't.
Robert Kaiser
Ed Jones wrote:
On or about 12/7/2009 9:16 PM, John Boyle typed the following:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/07/2009 05:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
All I can say is that I tried several times to install 2.0
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS
No, the only thing we really know is that is sometimes doesn't import
SeaMonkey 1.x profiles, but we haven't got any information whatsoever
that it reproducibly destroyed anything
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
That is a damn good question why should SM have anything to do with
iTunes but, I can tell you that it did totally destroy my iTunes
library. It happened before too but, this time I
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 5:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
So if no one can suggest an alternative, that means it was SM's
fault?
Sir, once again, your logic escapes me.
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: If he had NO trouble before SM2 , but NOW has trouble
since, IT IS VERY CLEAR LOGIC THAT SM2 IS THE PROBLEM!!! HOW CAN ANYONE
THINK OTHERWISE, USING LOGIC, THAT IS!!! :o
How about this John? Let's say you get home
Lou wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL the complaints that
On or about 12/8/2009 10:25 AM, John typed the following:
Ed Jones wrote:
S N I P
John, perhaps you'd care to tell us where you live? We might be able to
find a volunteer to see you and straighten out this problem. Apparently
it's not going to get resolved in this
On or about 12/8/2009 10:25 AM, John typed the following:
Ed Jones wrote:
On or about 12/7/2009 9:16 PM, John Boyle typed the following:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/07/2009 05:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
On 12/8/2009 7:31 AM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN
On 12/8/2009 7:50 AM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: If he had NO trouble before SM2 , but NOW has trouble
since, IT IS VERY CLEAR LOGIC THAT SM2 IS THE PROBLEM!!! HOW CAN ANYONE
THINK OTHERWISE, USING LOGIC, THAT IS!!! :o
How
Benoit Renard wrote:
John wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
You didn't do something totally stupid and kept your iTunes library
inside the SeaMonkey application directory did you? Otherwise SeaMonkey
has totally no idea where your iTunes library lives so it would be
totally unable to trash it even if
On 12/8/2009 10:44 AM, John wrote:
Benoit Renard wrote:
John wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
You didn't do something totally stupid and kept your iTunes library
inside the SeaMonkey application directory did you? Otherwise SeaMonkey
has totally no idea where your iTunes library lives so it would
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Let's just hope someone will come up with some sort of migration tool
extension.
In what bug the ability was removed?
The ability to import the old download history format was removed with:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472924
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip, I see nothing like this in the tools menu item in SM 2.
Lee
Its not called such:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 7:42 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 5:38 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 2:01 PM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 10:49 AM, John wrote:
Apparently migration from 1.18 to 2.0 is not supported
Tobias Fischer wrote:
On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip, I see nothing like this in the tools menu
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Tobias Fischer wrote:
On 08.12.2009 04:55, Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I don't know which. I all I know is what the developers are saying that
there is a Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose
import.
Phillip, I see nothing like
Phillip Jones wrote:
I all I know is what the developers are saying that there is a
Migration assistant built into 2, Tools menu import choose import.
That's at least not the recommended way; maybe it's even wrong. I know
that menu option exists and that it is using at least part of the same
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
[...]
All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!
John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps
are annoying!
keith whaley
To Keith , Leonidas ,et al: I do
Interviewed by CNN on 8/12/2009 13:30, John told the world:
Water off a Ducks back. I am wondering if it is because I have SM
installed in Documents and Settings? Perhaps I should try Program Files.
The interesting thing is though when SM2 installs it does not look
anything look 1.1.18.
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
[...]
All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!
John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps
are annoying!
keith whaley
To Keith , Leonidas
Phillip Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 5:06 PM, John wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
John wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John wrote:
/snip/
So if no one can suggest an alternative, that means it was SM's
fault?
Sir, once
Jens Hatlak:
The ability to import the old download history format was removed with:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472924
Thanks.
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
[...]
All yelling has been deleted, so nothing is left to display!
John, do you really have to yell all the time?
That you're unnecessarily strident is one thing, but all those caps
are annoying!
keith whaley
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 7:50 AM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: If he had NO trouble before SM2 , but NOW has trouble
since, IT IS VERY CLEAR LOGIC THAT SM2 IS THE PROBLEM!!! HOW CAN ANYONE
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Boyle wrote:
INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS
No, the only thing we really know is that is sometimes doesn't import
SeaMonkey 1.x profiles, but we haven't got any information whatsoever
that it reproducibly destroyed anything
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR
On 12/8/2009 4:11 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 7:50 AM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To Mark Hansen: If he had NO trouble before SM2 , but NOW has trouble
since, IT IS VERY CLEAR LOGIC THAT
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF
John Boyle wrote:
To Robert Kaiser: Sorry for the ALL Caps, but what I have said has been
demonstrated by MANY complaints on both this newsgroups and the support
lists! You just have NOT wanted to admit that FACT! :-(
Apology taken, but still I haven't seen reports of anything being
provable
John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
You have evidence that installing SM 2.0 had destroyed anything?
Absoultely
That one word doesn't make evidence.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
John Boyle wrote:
I will then have to switch to IE
Do that, you don't seem to want to understand or actually get help, from
all I read here - which I don't appreciate but I also see that it
rewards us more to help those who are willing than those who are not.
To summarize: For most people,
On 12/07/2009 06:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all, what are ALL the
On 12/8/2009 5:31 PM, John wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:30:19 -0600, John wrote:
Water off a Ducks back. I am wondering if it is because I have SM
installed in Documents and Settings?
Ah well, if the iTunes database also lives in Documents and Settings,
installing SeaMonkey (or Firefox, or Thunderbird, or any large
NoOp wrote:
On 12/07/2009 06:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX? Are you also a
SeaMonkey developer? INSTALLING SEAMONKEY 2.0 HAS BEEN KNOWN TO DESTROY
ALL SORTS OF THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DOWNLOADED OR HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED
THROUGH IT! After all,
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 5:45 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/8/2009 4:20 PM, John Boyle wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 12/7/2009 6:16 PM, John Boyle wrote:
To NoOp: And how would you know this, using LINUX?
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bush wrote:
I am back to Ver 1.1.18 and no more Beta problems. I'll try again
after version 2.5 is released
No, you won't. Several people have stated that migration from 1.1.xx to
2.1 and later will not be supported. Jump now or at some late date start
SM configuration
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:48:59 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bush wrote:
I am back to Ver 1.1.18 and no more Beta problems. I'll try again
after version 2.5 is released
No, you won't. Several people have stated that migration from 1.1.xx to
2.1 and later will not be supported.
Philip Chee a écrit :
Basically the core developers said that if it is that important to us
(seamonkey developers) we can jolly well re-invent that functionality
ourselves.
Seriously, that sucks. Making things difficult is really not a good way
to convince people to switch to our products.
S. Beaulieu:
Philip Chee a écrit :
Basically the core developers said that if it is that important to us
(seamonkey developers) we can jolly well re-invent that functionality
ourselves.
Seriously, that sucks. Making things difficult is really not a good way
to convince people to switch to
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Philip Chee a écrit :
Basically the core developers said that if it is that important to us
(seamonkey developers) we can jolly well re-invent that functionality
ourselves.
Seriously, that sucks. Making things difficult is really not a good way
to convince people to switch
Leonidas Jones wrote:
I imagine the functionality had been in plac e back in the pre FF1.0
days, when they did a similar move of the profile location ( to much
gnashing of teeth, I might add). Clearly, there is no need for it in
Firefox anymore, so I can understand their desire to remove it.
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bush wrote:
jim wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in
mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of
seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be
Marked as BETA
Time for me
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
