On 11/3/2010 8:19 AM PT, Beauregard T. Shagnasty typed:
You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want to
divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one at a
time.
Yes, I want to show eahc reciever's e-mail from a single mass e-mail.
Darn, there's no
Ant wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty typed:
You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want
to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one
at a time.
Yes, I want to show eahc reciever's [sic] e-mail from a single mass
e-mail. Darn, there's no way
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Ant wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty typed:
You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want
to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one
at a time.
Yes, I want to show eahc reciever's [sic] e-mail from a single mass
On 11/4/2010 7:18 AM PT, Rick Merrill typed:
You can't do that while using multiples in BCC:, except if you want
to divulge one of them to all the rest. Or send separate emails one
at a time.
Yes, I want to show eahc reciever's [sic] e-mail from a single mass
e-mail. Darn, there's no way
Hi!
I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not
show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I entered.
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send to multiple
people, without showing other names and letting them know it is a BCC,
from
Ant wrote:
I know BCC and CC exists. BCC is nice but I don't want to have To not
show To: undisclosed-recipients. I do want to show the name I
entered. Is there a way to have SeaMonkey show the name when I send
to multiple people, without showing other names and letting them know
it is a
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
The normal practice to avoid undisclosed-recipients is to place your
own email address in the TO: field. Since you are sending to multiple
BCC: people, are you suggesting that you want each *recipient's* name in
the TO: field that /they/ see?
You can't do that
My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the
ISP-level.
Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients?
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that.
It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one
ISP at a time.
Something
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Beauregard wrote:
doc wrote:
My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the
ISP-level.
Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients?
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine
for almost 2 years,
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that. It worked fine
for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one ISP at a
time.Something wrong with their filters mishandled it and there is
not a good way to get them to fix it.
So .. you are getting bounces from the recipients' ISPs. Try
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
My recent experience is that this method triggers SPAM filters at the
ISP-level.
Which method? Yourself in the TO:? Or undisclosed-recipients?
Putting my E-mail in the TO: field and BCC below that.
It worked fine for almost 2 years, then the bounces started one
ISP at a
11 matches
Mail list logo
