Re: To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..

Stan wrote: Rex wrote: It looks like all the problems are due to migrating from 1.x. I'm a new user of Seamonkey- I discovered it about a week before 2.0 released and so I've used nothing but 2.0 from the start. Aside from a few minor bugs that I've got solutions for here, I find it extremely

Re: To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..

chicagofan wrote: Stan wrote: Rex wrote: /snip/ In spite of Old Croc Boyle's protestations for the last month, the majority does not consider SM 2.0 junk. :) I upgraded 1.1.14 to a beta of 2.0 to get the newsgroup crossposting filter, then upgraded to this release; with only the SMTP edit

To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..

It looks like all the problems are due to migrating from 1.x. I'm a new user of Seamonkey- I discovered it about a week before 2.0 released and so I've used nothing but 2.0 from the start. Aside from a few minor bugs that I've got solutions for here, I find it extremely stable and loads pages

Re: To all those claiming that SM 2.0 is 'junk'..

Rex wrote: It looks like all the problems are due to migrating from 1.x. I'm a new user of Seamonkey- I discovered it about a week before 2.0 released and so I've used nothing but 2.0 from the start. Aside from a few minor bugs that I've got solutions for here, I find it extremely stable and