On 1/27/2018 1:04 AM, Daniel wrote:
> WaltS48 wrote:
>> On 1/25/18 11:18 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
On
WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/25/18 11:18 PM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on
On 1/25/18 11:18 PM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:18 PM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is
On 1/25/2018 8:18 PM, Daniel wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
>>> On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the
On 1/25/2018 8:32 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> 2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
>> 2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in
On 1/25/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
on 52.6
Firefox does not show
On 1/25/2018 3:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
52.5.3 ESR:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
On 1/24/2018 7:51 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> 2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
>> 2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
>> on 52.6
>>
>> Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
>>
>> 52.5.3 ESR:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based
on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
52.5.3 ESR:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/52.0
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>
> Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
>
> 52.5.3 ESR:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
> Firefox/52.0
>
> 2.49.2 x 64 local build:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>
2.49.1 is based on ESR 52.4
2.49.2 should (hopefully) arrive in the next 2-3 weeks and will be based on 52.6
Firefox does not show minor version numbers in its UA string.
52.5.3 ESR:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
2.49.2 x 64 local build:
On 1/24/18 10:56 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/24/2018 5:35 AM, Richmond wrote:
cat comm-esr52/mozilla/browser/config/version.txt
52.6.0
Wouldn't it be a good idea to make this version number appear in the
User Agent string? It is currently showing Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2
(i.e. in Help
On 1/24/2018 5:35 AM, Richmond wrote:
> cat comm-esr52/mozilla/browser/config/version.txt
> 52.6.0
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to make this version number appear in the
> User Agent string? It is currently showing Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2
> (i.e. in Help -> About).
>
> I am thinking that
16 matches
Mail list logo