On 4/5/17 3:33 PM, Mason83 wrote:
On 28/03/2017 20:58, Mason83 wrote:
On 28/03/2017 18:09, David H. Durgee wrote:
Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following:
└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
The memory figure is highlighted in red, so I assume
On 28/03/2017 20:58, Mason83 wrote:
> On 28/03/2017 18:09, David H. Durgee wrote:
>
>> Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following:
>>
>>└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
>>
>> The memory figure is highlighted in red, so I assume this is a problem.
>>
> Does that mean that the site where one downloads SeaMonkey is going to
> change?
No its an internal thing. The bata builds are done but now comes the fun
part of moving them to the right places so might need another build:
On 31/03/2017 4:47 AM, EE wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Still probably at least 3-4 weeks away. Ewong is currently on 2.48 beta
to iron out switching to new distribution servers and we bad
infrastructure issues galore. The beta will be followed by a regular
2.48 and then hopefully a 2.49
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Still probably at least 3-4 weeks away. Ewong is currently on 2.48 beta
to iron out switching to new distribution servers and we bad
infrastructure issues galore. The beta will be followed by a regular
2.48 and then hopefully a 2.49 from the ESR tree fast.
Does that
On 28/03/2017 18:09, David H. Durgee wrote:
> Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following:
>
>└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
>
> The memory figure is highlighted in red, so I assume this is a problem.
> I have the memory report saved and can make
>
> I have not as yet tried it. Only a manual install is available at present, so
> I was waiting on Ubuntuzilla to get back to a "normal" update method.
Still probably at least 3-4 weeks away. Ewong is currently on 2.48 beta to
iron out switching to new distribution servers and we bad
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
If you press GC under Free Memory does it get back to normal?
No. I also tried the "minimize memory" there. After running these the
memory figures were still as bad if not worse.
You can send me the
>└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
If you press GC under Free Memory does it get back to normal?
You can send me the report together with the output of about:support (use copy
text to clipboard). I am no expert here so don't have high hopes.
Did you try Adrians 2.49
Looking at the memory report in the browser I see the following:
└──-2,644.69 MB (-158.38%) ── heap-unclassified [?!]
The memory figure is highlighted in red, so I assume this is a problem.
I have the memory report saved and can make it available to you.
Dave
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
I waited a bit after restarting SeaMonkey and now that it appears to be
eating a lot of memory ran the about:memory as suggested. The report
does appear to show some problems with memory management as there were
red highlighted entries. I have never looked at this before, but it
appears to
TCW wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:12:30 -0400, "David H. Durgee"
wrote:
I am currently running Adrian's 64 bit build on linux mint 17.2 x64 and
am noticing what I can only assume is a memory leak over time. I just
had to restart SM when my system usage showed it using 1.7GB
Hmm two seem to be startup crashes. I think there were some problems
recently solved in Gecko / Firefox. Need to check if we picked up all
patches there. But running 2.50 for quite some time now in a vm and
didn't experience them yet.
Third is a problem with some Nvidia dll. If not done yet
David H. Durgee wrote:
> I am currently running Adrian's 64 bit build on linux mint 17.2 x64 and
> am noticing what I can only assume is a memory leak over time. I just
> had to restart SM when my system usage showed it using 1.7GB of memory!
> After restarting it now reports 725MB used, so
2.50 has a few problems but didn't crash on me yet. Any specifics?
FRG
TCW wrote:
I'm on 2.50 (Winx64) myself but it's crashy as heck but no
leakage that I can see like with the older versions.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Maybe you can check with about:memory and open a bug if you find something.
For me I found that Amazon seems to cause some problems over time.
These are likely Gecko problems and will also occur in Firefox but probably
some might be SeaMonkey or extension specific.
FRG
David H. Durgee
I am currently running Adrian's 64 bit build on linux mint 17.2 x64 and
am noticing what I can only assume is a memory leak over time. I just
had to restart SM when my system usage showed it using 1.7GB of memory!
After restarting it now reports 725MB used, so this is quite an improvement.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo