Re: 2.46 crash

Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit : Bug is marked fixed for (unreleased) 2.47. Might be fixed in 2.48: OK. I'm trying. Regards, JKB ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: 2.46 crash

Bug is marked fixed for (unreleased) 2.47. Might be fixed in 2.48: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1276853 Please try this one. FRG BERTRAND Joël wrote: Mason83 a écrit : On 05/08/2017 10:17, BERTRAND Joël wrote: Hello, I use seamonkey for a long time and on one of my

Re: 2.46 crash

Mason83 a écrit : On 05/08/2017 10:17, BERTRAND Joël wrote: Hello, I use seamonkey for a long time and on one of my workstations, it often crashes since 2.40 if I remember) with following trace in terminal : ATTENTION: default value of option force_s3tc_enable overridden by

Re: 2.46 crash

On 05/08/2017 10:17, BERTRAND Joël wrote: > Hello, > > I use seamonkey for a long time and on one of my workstations, it often > crashes since 2.40 if I remember) with following trace in terminal : > > ATTENTION: default value of option force_s3tc_enable overridden by >

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

EE wrote: Disable automatic updating. In Preferences > Advanced > Software Installation, under "SeaMonkey" uncheck "Automatically check for updates". Not the same thing. Checking for updates and notifying the user doesn't install anything. If you want to disable automatic updating, the box

Re: 2.46 update not working

Desiree wrote: On 12/27/2016 8:10 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

Jonathan N. Little wrote: accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: This thread has gone in the wrong direction, as it is focusing on whether or not I have backed up my profile data. No you seem to be missing the point. You did not need to create a new profile and "lose" your data just by uninstalling

Re: 2.46 on Linux is not displaying SVG images

NoOp composed on 2017-01-11 18:31 (UTC-0800): Felix Miata wrote: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.46; Build ID: 20161005013219 on openSUSE Linux 42.1 I don't use anything newer because I cannot located anything newer that is built with GTK2, and GTK3

Re: 2.46 on Linux is not displaying SVG images

On 01/11/2017 02:29 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.46; Build > ID: 20161005013219 on openSUSE Linux 42.1 > > I don't use anything newer because I cannot located anything newer that is > built > with GTK2, and GTK3 builds suffer this

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

On 31/12/2016 03:39, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > bern...@nospam.com wrote: >> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >> works perfect. Any ideas? > Just a thought...When I open the data manager for the

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

bern...@nospam.com wrote on 2016-12-26: > Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 With my existing work profile the Data Manager was very slow in Seamonkey under Windows. It was good again after deleting storage/*.*, content-prefs.sqlite, cookies.sqlite, formhistory.sqlite,

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

Le 31/12/2016 à 18:44, WaltS48 a écrit : Some of us clear browsing history on shutdown. I do -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > This thread has gone in the wrong direction, as it is focusing on whether or > not I have backed up my profile data. > No you seem to be missing the point. You did not need to create a new profile and "lose" your data just by uninstalling SeaMonkey and

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

This thread has gone in the wrong direction, as it is focusing on whether or not I have backed up my profile data. The original (and more important) question is -- is "shouldn't SeaMonkey check System Requirements before automatically updating?" ___

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue > from the 2.46 Release Notes. > > "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and > then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier, SeaMonkey will rename

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

On 12/31/2016 12:32 PM, accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue from the 2.46 Release Notes. "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier,

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue from the 2.46 Release Notes. "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier, SeaMonkey will rename your history file to

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > SeaMonkey 2.46 has automatically updated itself on my computer running Mac OS > 10.6.8. > > This update is not compatible (it requires Mac OS 10.9), and therefore does > not run. > > It also cripples my profile. > > And so now I must re-install 2.40, and start

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Paul Bergsagel wrote: > bern...@nospam.com wrote: >> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >> works perfect. Any ideas? > Just a thought...When I open the data manager for the first time in a >

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

bern...@nospam.com wrote: Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 works perfect. Any ideas? Just a thought...When I open the data manager for the first time in a session the data manager seems to

Re: 2.46 update not working

Edmund Wong wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 automatically. Help! Hi Ken, Can you

Re: 2.46 update not working

Extension checking is in the Mozilla backend and changed significatly between 2.40 and 2.46 (mostly not for the better). Signing requirements are turned off but still some checks for sideloaded apps are done. Extensions might get disabled but from tests reenabling them again worked. No

Re: 2.46 update not working

On 12/27/2016 8:10 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it

Re: 2.46 SeaMonkey and Mac OS 10...

EE wrote: Paul Bergsagel wrote: Hi, According to posts I have read in this newsgroup Seamonkey 2.46 no longer supports Mac OS 6-8. Is this true? I am running 2.46 on a late 2006 iMac running 10.7.5 Seamonkey runs very well on my iMac. I have not noticed any issues or problems with SeaMonkey.

Re: 2.46 update not working

Edmund Wong wrote: > Ken Rudolph wrote: >> 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program >> >> I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure >> that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to >> 2.46 automatically. Help! > > Can

Re: 2.46 update not working

Ken Rudolph wrote: > 1) POP e-mail not updating > 2) password manager crashes program > > I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure > that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 > automatically. Help! > Hi Ken, Can you clarify what

Re: 2.46 update not working

On 12/27/2016 8:48 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote: > 1) POP e-mail not updating > 2) password manager crashes program > > I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure > that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 > automatically. Help! >

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

The previous script swallowed entries or just ended the search with an exception. There were also some errors in the script which just resulted in nothing displayed in e.g. under storage. It now tries to map them to the correct domain and when it fails displays them under the global * domain.

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: [fixed top-posting] > Jonathan N. Little wrote: >> Also not that this was not a problem at all just a few days ago >> with 2.40 with same data. It just manifested as a problem with >> 2.46. There is something significantly different with the upgrade. > > Yes because it

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Yes because it probably was broken before or just swallowed some entries. It now should display and process all of them which might mean it might need some performance tuning in the source code. You can set data_manager.debug to true in about:config and check what it is doing in the console.

Re: 2.46 update not working

How about filing a bug for the two issues. #2 is likely profile related and #1 might be also. If yes this won't go away. Ken Rudolph wrote: This really scares me, since I don't know what I'd do ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: 2.46 update not working

On 12/27/2016 1:17 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 12/27/2016 o 07:10 PM, Ken Rudolph pisze: Thank you. I'll be honest, this is the first time since Netscape 1.0 that an update has failed so disastrously. This really scares me, since I don't know what I'd do without SeaMonkey. To be honest:

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Hawker wrote: > On 12/27/2016 10:46 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> The source might need some fine tuning. Maybe someone can check the >> row counts in the content-prefs and permissions DB when it does >> this. >> >> Data Manager does read all of them during start. In at least the >> 2.39 and

Re: 2.46 update not working

W dniu 12/27/2016 o 07:10 PM, Ken Rudolph pisze: > Thank you. I'll be honest, this is the first time since Netscape 1.0 > that an update has failed so disastrously. This really scares me, since > I don't know what I'd do without SeaMonkey. To be honest: as no one reported similar problems, it

Re: 2.46 update not working

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 automatically.

Re: 2.46 update not working

Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 automatically. Help! The reload and

Re: 2.46 update not working

Ken Rudolph wrote: 1) POP e-mail not updating 2) password manager crashes program I need to go back to 2.40 and have downloaded it. How can I make sure that it will use my profile, and how can I stop it from updating to 2.46 automatically. Help! The reload and re-install of 2.40 worked,

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

On 12/27/2016 10:46 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The source might need some fine tuning. Maybe someone can check the row counts in the content-prefs and permissions DB when it does this. Data Manager does read all of them during start. In at least the 2.39 and 2.40 versions it might have

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

The source might need some fine tuning. Maybe someone can check the row counts in the content-prefs and permissions DB when it does this. Data Manager does read all of them during start. In at least the 2.39 and 2.40 versions it might have crapped out because of errors early. FRG Hawker

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

On 12/25/2016 9:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 works perfect. Any ideas? Same issue here. It locks up for a bit with a "not responding", but eventually

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 17:18, cyberzen a écrit : Le 26/12/2016 à 11:53, Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit : Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? thank you for your reply, I went recently (in October) from 2.26.1 to 2.40 and that's all I have another XP SP3 PC that was

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

On 12/26/2016 10:43 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know what > you > are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like SQLiteStudio when > SeaMonkey is not running. > > Also check the * global domain for junk. > > You

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know > what you are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like > SQLiteStudio when SeaMonkey is not running. permissions.sqlite just seems to be two table definitions but no records. I have DB

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Good. There is maybe a lot of junk in permissions.sqlite. If you know what you are doing you can clean it out with an sqlite editor like SQLiteStudio when SeaMonkey is not running. Also check the * global domain for junk. You can also try the old cookie viewer to check the allowed cookie

Re: 2.46 data manager not working UPDATE

Jonathan N. Little wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 12/25/2016 6:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: >>> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >>> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >>> works perfect. Any ideas? >>> >> >> Windows 7

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

David E. Ross wrote: > On 12/25/2016 6:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: >> Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my >> password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 >> works perfect. Any ideas? >> > > Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 > Mozilla/5.0

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 11:53, Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit : Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? thank you for your reply, I went recently (in October) from 2.26.1 to 2.40 and that's all -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Likely a corrupt profile. Check if bug 1305624 applies: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1305624 Did you use a version higher than 2.46 with this profile in the past? You can delete the storage directory in you profile and see if the error goes away. Usually its non essential but

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

Le 26/12/2016 à 06:09, Jonathan N. Little a écrit : bern...@nospam.com wrote: Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 works perfect. Any ideas? Same here, message script not responding after a

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

bern...@nospam.com writes: > Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my password > list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 works > perfect. Any ideas? It is working ok for me on linux 2.49. But I read that the data manager on 2.40 was half broken. So

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

On 12/25/2016 6:08 PM, bern...@nospam.com wrote: > Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my > password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 > works perfect. Any ideas? > Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0)

Re: 2.46 data manager not working

bern...@nospam.com wrote: > Having a problem with data manager in 2.46 I tried to get into my > password list and the window comes up and locks up. Went back to 2.40 > works perfect. Any ideas? Same here, message script not responding after a long time. The only way I could get to passwords is

Re: 2.46 SeaMonkey and Mac OS 10.7.5

Paul Bergsagel wrote: Hi, According to posts I have read in this newsgroup Seamonkey 2.46 no longer supports Mac OS 6-8. Is this true? I am running 2.46 on a late 2006 iMac running 10.7.5 Seamonkey runs very well on my iMac. I have not noticed any issues or problems with SeaMonkey. So why do

Re: 2.46 SeaMonkey and Mac OS 10.7.5

Because Firefox discontinued support and it was also discontinued in the Gecko backend SeaMonkey uses. Its great that it still works but it is completely unsupported. SeaMonkey 2.40 shouldn't have updated itself but ewong already stated that this was/is a problem on the update servers. Older

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 07:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being

Re: 2.46

Original Message Roger Fink wrote: Original Message On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's

Re: 2.46

Roger Fink wrote: > Original Message >> On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and >>> no one else). >>> >>> While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's >>> prudent

Re: 2.46 and Tabs?

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/23/2016 10:16 AM, Sanpam wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/23/2016 3:47 AM, Sanpam wrote: I notice that 2.46 is opening new tabs on the tab bar, even though I'm using the same settings as I did with 2.40 to turn them off. An example is opening the add-ons manager.

Re: 2.46 and Tabs?

On 12/23/2016 10:16 AM, Sanpam wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 12/23/2016 3:47 AM, Sanpam wrote: >>> I notice that 2.46 is opening new tabs on the tab bar, even though I'm >>> using the same settings as I did with 2.40 to turn them off. An example >>> is opening the add-ons manager. How do I

Re: 2.46

Ant writes: > On 12/22/2016 10:50 PM, Richmond wrote: >> Hawker writes: >> >>> Can I get a quick education - I had to google what that even means. >>> As I understand this that started in the first Pentium 4 computers correct? >>> In

Re: 2.46 and Tabs?

David E. Ross wrote: On 12/23/2016 3:47 AM, Sanpam wrote: I notice that 2.46 is opening new tabs on the tab bar, even though I'm using the same settings as I did with 2.40 to turn them off. An example is opening the add-ons manager. How do I turn off the opening of new tabs in 2.46? On the

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/23/2016 at 11:15 AM, Ed Mullen's prodigious digits fired off: On 12/22/2016 at 2:00 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl's prodigious digits fired off: If you got it from Adrian stay with 2.47. Not sure if the profiles are 100% compatible between 2.46 and 2.47. The next version will likely be 2.48. It

Re: 2.46 and Tabs?

On 12/23/2016 3:47 AM, Sanpam wrote: > I notice that 2.46 is opening new tabs on the tab bar, even though I'm > using the same settings as I did with 2.40 to turn them off. An example > is opening the add-ons manager. How do I turn off the opening of new > tabs in 2.46? > On the menu bar:

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/22/2016 at 2:00 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl's prodigious digits fired off: If you got it from Adrian stay with 2.47. Not sure if the profiles are 100% compatible between 2.46 and 2.47. The next version will likely be 2.48. It might also not be available officially as a 64 bit Windows version.

Re: 2.46 and F.B. Purity for Facebook

Sanpam wrote: The new version of F.B. Purity for Facebook does not work with 2.46. The previous version of FB does still work. Anyone else seeing this? I just got some interesting comments from the developer of FBP: "It seems Seamonkey is claiming to be compatible with FF49, but it doesn't

Re: 2.46

I see here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/your-hardware-no-longer-supported It says: "You may be able to obtain a version that does not require SSE2 from your Linux distribution." Does this mean that I could compile seamonkey on my AMD Athlon XP (currently running slackware) in theory?

Re: 2.46

Hawker writes: > Can I get a quick education - I had to google what that even means. > As I understand this that started in the first Pentium 4 computers correct? > In other words this is only an issue for very old Pentium 3 and earlier > computers correct?

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 10:50 PM, Richmond wrote: Hawker writes: Can I get a quick education - I had to google what that even means. As I understand this that started in the first Pentium 4 computers correct? In other words this is only an issue for very old

Re: 2.46 version

John Duncan wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Pat Connors wrote: >>> In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using >>> 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is >>> available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? >> >> Breach?

Re: 2.46

Original Message On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 7:44 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Is there a method by which an end-user can determine if a PC has a CPU that is SSE enabled? cat /proc/cpuinfo If you aren't fortunate enough to be on an OS where that works, Windows has msinfo32 and wmic, although you'll have to compare the

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Hi All, > > (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and > no one else). > > While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's > prudent that I post this here. > > SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 9:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/22/2016 08:56 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach?

Re: 2.46 version

Edmund Wong wrote: Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund I think he's

re: 2.46

Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being released due to a plethora of issues (I am so damn

Re: 2.46 version

Pat Connors wrote: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using > 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is > available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund

Re: 2.46 version

If you got it from Adrian stay with 2.47. Not sure if the profiles are 100% compatible between 2.46 and 2.47. The next version will likely be 2.48. It might also not be available officially as a 64 bit Windows version. FRG Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was

Re: 2.46 version

I forced a refresh of the website with Ctrl-R and 2.46 now shows up on it. FRG David E. Ross wrote: On 12/22/2016 10:37 AM, Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available

Re: 2.46 version

Pat Connors writes: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 > bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for > download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? > > Currently it is not available at

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/22/2016 10:37 AM, Pat Connors wrote: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using > 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is > available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? > > Currently it is not available at

Re: 2.46 Install file

I am not sure where this version comes from. A previous post indicate that its just Adrians version without credits given. Whatever. Do not use it or file bugs against it. You can get the unoffical versions from: https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/ Bugs

Re: 2.46 Install file

Mr. Ed wrote: On 11/28/16 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." I go to and look in releases and even nightlies and can't find the Windows install file for 2.46. Any thoughts? Running 64 bit version - Check

Re: 2.46 Install file

On 11/28/2016 10:51 AM, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 11/28/2016 o 04:41 PM, WaltS48 pisze: On 11/28/2016 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." I go to and look in releases and even nightlies and can't find the

Re: 2.46 Install file

On 11/28/16 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: > I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." > > I go to and look in releases and even > nightlies and can't find the Windows install file for 2.46. Any thoughts? > > Running 64 bit version - Check it

Re: 2.46 Install file

W dniu 11/28/2016 o 04:41 PM, WaltS48 pisze: > On 11/28/2016 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: >> I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." >> >> I go to and look in releases >> and even nightlies and can't find the Windows install file for 2.46. >> Any

Re: 2.46 Install file

On 11/28/2016 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." I go to and look in releases and even nightlies and can't find the Windows install file for 2.46. Any thoughts? Maybe you installed build6 from

Re: 2.46 Install file

On 28/11/2016 10:15 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: I'm running SM 2.46 on the "default update channel." I go to and look in releases and even nightlies and can't find the Windows install file for 2.46. Any thoughts? 2.46 has not been released. The latest

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 11/19/2016 10:47 PM, Felix Miata wrote: TCW composed on 2016-11-19 14:10 (UTC-0600): On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:07:28 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK:

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 19/11/2016 22:47, Felix Miata wrote: > TCW composed on 2016-11-19 14:10 (UTC-0600): > >> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:07:28 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > >>> No scroll buttons is why: >>> http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png > >>> 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: >>>

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

TCW composed on 2016-11-19 14:10 (UTC-0600): On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:07:28 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

Felix Miata wrote: EE composed on 2016-11-18 11:37 (UTC-0700): Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png So Linux still

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

EE composed on 2016-11-18 11:37 (UTC-0700): Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png So Linux still has scroll buttons?

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 11/18/2016 07:37 PM, EE wrote: Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png So Linux still has scroll buttons? Mac OS lost them

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png So Linux still has scroll buttons? Mac OS lost them several versions ago. What about

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 11/18/2016 05:19 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 11/18/2016 02:07 AM, Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png That should be a known

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 11/18/2016 02:07 AM, Felix Miata wrote: No scroll buttons is why: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png That should be a known bug. On Ubuntu there aren't any for

Re: 2.46 build 20161029224245 not usable

On 11/17/2016 11:07 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > No scroll buttons is why: > http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsMissingRV46SM.png > > 2.46 build 20161005013219 is OK: > http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/Moz/scrollButtonsOKrv46SM20161005013219.png > SeaMonkey 2.46 is still in development. Problems should

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

On 20.10.2016 19:33, Adrian Kalla wrote: W dniu 10/20/2016 o 11:19 AM, Rainer Ullrich pisze: The confusing point is: On a windows 64bit, if you have installed such a *32bit* preview 2.46 SeaMonkey, and you click on "Help->Check for update", you will be offered a 2.46 update! If you accept this

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

W dniu 10/20/2016 o 11:19 AM, Rainer Ullrich pisze: > The confusing point is: > On a windows 64bit, if you have installed such a *32bit* preview 2.46 > SeaMonkey, > and you click on "Help->Check for update", you will be offered a 2.46 > update! > > If you accept this update, your 32bit SeaMonkey

  1   2   >