Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

David E. Ross wrote: > On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! >> >> Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... >> man.. little DID I know. >> >> Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... >> >> After so long

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Hi All, > > (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and > no one else). > > While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's > prudent that I post this here. > > SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

Ditto. Mine keeps going to DuckDuckGo. :( On 11/15/2016 8:35 PM, cmcadams wrote: I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes the new

Re: 2.46

I see here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/your-hardware-no-longer-supported It says: "You may be able to obtain a version that does not require SSE2 from your Linux distribution." Does this mean that I could compile seamonkey on my AMD Athlon XP (currently running slackware) in theory?

SOLVED: Re: Address Book Contacts Disappeared

Daniel wrote: On 17/12/2016 8:31 AM, Brian Mailman wrote: Seamonkey 2.40 Windows 10 Help, please. I just used the address book to send out an invitation (if anyone doesn't recognize the word, it's where "invite" as a noun came from) with a stack of bccs. Today I opened it and every contact

Mnenhy with 2.46

Didn't someone post a fix for Mnenhy with 2.46? I thought I saw it but cannot find the post. Had a bit of a panic because it messed up my header panel which interfered with Enigmail decoding message in one of my accounts... -- Take care, Jonathan --- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO

re: 2.46

Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being released due to a plethora of issues (I am so damn

Re: 2.46 version

Pat Connors wrote: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using > 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is > available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund

Re: 2.46

Original Message On 12/22/2016 6:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 7:44 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Is there a method by which an end-user can determine if a PC has a CPU that is SSE enabled? cat /proc/cpuinfo If you aren't fortunate enough to be on an OS where that works, Windows has msinfo32 and wmic, although you'll have to compare the

Re: Mnenhy with 2.46

Jonathan N. Little wrote: Didn't someone post a fix for Mnenhy with 2.46? I thought I saw it but cannot find the post. Had a bit of a panic because it messed up my header panel which interfered with Enigmail decoding message in one of my accounts... >FWIW, mnenhy already displays Xface >Take a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Edmund, thank you for fixing the official web site's home page and internal updater for 64-bit W7 users. I just got its internal update. :D On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was

Re: Mnenhy with 2.46

John Duncan wrote: > Jonathan N. Little wrote: >>> Didn't someone post a fix for Mnenhy with 2.46? I thought I saw it but >>> cannot find the post. Had a bit of a panic because it messed up my >>> header panel which interfered with Enigmail decoding message in one of >>> my accounts... >>FWIW,

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 10:50 PM, Richmond wrote: Hawker writes: Can I get a quick education - I had to google what that even means. As I understand this that started in the first Pentium 4 computers correct? In other words this is only an issue for very old

Re: 2.46

Hawker writes: > Can I get a quick education - I had to google what that even means. > As I understand this that started in the first Pentium 4 computers correct? > In other words this is only an issue for very old Pentium 3 and earlier > computers correct?

Re: 2.46 version

Edmund Wong wrote: Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach? Edmund I think he's

Re: 2.46 version

John Duncan wrote: > Edmund Wong wrote: >> Pat Connors wrote: >>> In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using >>> 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is >>> available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? >> >> Breach?

Re: 2.46

On 12/22/2016 9:48 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, (this is a personal note, so any flak should be directed to me only and no one else). While this is in the soon-to-be-released release notes, I felt it's prudent that I post this here. SeaMonkey 2.46 took it's not-so-sweet time in being

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/22/2016 08:56 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Breach? What breach?

Resurrecting an old theme

In case anybody else has saved a copy, the Mostly Crystal theme works perfectly on this upgrade to 2.46, even after many years of lying dormant. Or at least that is true for my installation on Win7/32, which I use for browsing and newsgroup posting. I only had to update install.rdf. JMO of

Re: Google Search Tools broken

On 12/22/2016 2:12 PM, Richmond wrote: Hawker writes: On 12/22/2016 8:00 AM, Richmond wrote: I raised a bug here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1325048 Thank you Richmond. I tried Ralph's work around GIF and mine doesn't do that for

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Edmund Wong wrote: > Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! > > Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... > man.. little DID I know. > > Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... > > After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey >

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: > Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! > > Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... > man.. little DID I know. > > Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... > > After so long a delay, for which we

SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the

Re: 2.46 version

On 12/22/2016 10:37 AM, Pat Connors wrote: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using > 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is > available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? > > Currently it is not available at

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 11:33 AM, sean wrote: On 12/22/2016 03:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

This also works if you have enabled the search bar. EE wrote: John Duncan wrote: EE wrote: cmcadams wrote: I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in Why not just change it in the search bar? It works that way, and it is more convenient to access as well.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Its a self extracting 7zip. When corrupt you won't be able to install it. FRG David E. Ross wrote: On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: I cannot find any checksums for the new version. I use them to verify that the downloaded installer was not corrupted during its travel through the

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

Use the force (or google search). Known bug. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 for a workaround. Or open Sidebar. Set search engine and do one search from there. Default engine should be set to this one then. FRG John Duncan wrote: EE wrote: cmcadams wrote: I've

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 9:36 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Its a self extracting 7zip. When corrupt you won't be able to install it. > > FRG > > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> >> I cannot find any checksums for the new version. I use them to verify >> that the

2.46 version

In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? Currently it is not available at the SeaMonkey website so where are some getting the

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Use the force (or google search). Known bug. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1265881 for a workaround. Or open Sidebar. Set search engine and do one search from there. Default engine should be set to this one then. FRG John Duncan wrote: EE

Re: Google Search Tools broken

Hawker writes: > On 12/22/2016 8:00 AM, Richmond wrote: >> I raised a bug here: >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1325048 >> > > Thank you Richmond. > I tried Ralph's work around GIF and mine doesn't do that for some reason. I > see your

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

EE wrote: cmcadams wrote: I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes the new unchangeable option even if you then Restore Defaults. Not a

Re: 2.46 version

If you got it from Adrian stay with 2.47. Not sure if the profiles are 100% compatible between 2.46 and 2.47. The next version will likely be 2.48. It might also not be available officially as a 64 bit Windows version. FRG Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

2.46 requires an SSE2 capable CPU under Windows. Linux versions should not need it. Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hello, I contributed some additional release notes here Please feel free to

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Always good to have then so you know no one tampered with the files. FRG David E. Ross wrote: On 12/22/2016 9:36 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Its a self extracting 7zip. When corrupt you won't be able to install it. FRG David E. Ross wrote: On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 03:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the

Re: SM2.46 default search engine problem

John Duncan wrote: EE wrote: cmcadams wrote: I've just installed SM2.46, and discovered that the engine pick list in Edit > Preferences > Browser > Internet Search isn't working. I got my choice by deleting all the alternatives, which becomes the new unchangeable option even if you then

Re: 2.46 version

I forced a refresh of the website with Ctrl-R and 2.46 now shows up on it. FRG David E. Ross wrote: On 12/22/2016 10:37 AM, Pat Connors wrote: In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available

Re: 2.46 version

Pat Connors writes: > In the interim since the 2.40 breach was discovered, I have been using 2.47 64 > bit with no problems what so ever. Question, when 2.46 is available for > download, should I use it or stay with the 2.47 version? > > Currently it is not available at

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Hello, I contributed some additional release notes here Please feel free to comment, correct, add information, ... CU Rainer ___

Re: Google Search Tools broken

On 12/22/2016 8:00 AM, Richmond wrote: I raised a bug here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1325048 Thank you Richmond. I tried Ralph's work around GIF and mine doesn't do that for some reason. I see your bug got declined as "invalid". Sounds like the fix is to change the user

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

sean wrote: On 12/22/2016 11:33 AM, sean wrote: On 12/22/2016 03:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post...

Re: Am I doing this correctly ?

NFN Smith wrote: All good stuff. A couple of additional thoughts inserted... Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I have files unrelated to SeaMonkey that are no less important. I do a system-wide backup every week. In my case, nightly (mission-critical work computer). The first

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

PhillipJones wrote: Just went to help menu check for updates 2.46 come right up. Installed and currently using (mac version) I am using MacOS 12.2.2 the way the security is in Sierra if its defective it won't install. Not here on Win7 Pro SP1 -- "There are no updates available..." Didn't we

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Mason83 wrote: On 22/12/2016 13:10, Ant wrote: Ditto, but I am not getting any internal updates for v2.46 in my updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's SM v2.40 installation. What about the rest of you? https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/22/tears-of-joy/ ewong wrote: Seriously though... I do

Re: Advice on flashblocker.................

marksatt...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 10:02:55 AM UTC-6, marks...@sbcglobal.net wrote: I am using Flashblock 1.5.18, which has worked very well for a long time. For a while now however, CNN in particular has been pushing video popups that launch when you load an

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 22/12/2016 13:10, Ant wrote: > Ditto, but I am not getting any internal updates for v2.46 in my updated > 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's SM v2.40 installation. What about the rest of you? https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/22/tears-of-joy/ ewong wrote: > Seriously though... I do have one

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 4:26 AM, Mason83 wrote: On 22/12/2016 13:10, Ant wrote: Ditto, but I am not getting any internal updates for v2.46 in my updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's SM v2.40 installation. What about the rest of you? https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/12/22/tears-of-joy/ Oops. I mised

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Ditto, but I am not getting any internal updates for v2.46 in my updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's SM v2.40 installation. What about the rest of you? On 12/22/2016 3:46 AM, null wrote: - You deserve a "God Bless You". Congratulations for all the team. Is this a Christmas gift? On 2016-12-22 10:13,

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

- You deserve a "God Bless You". Congratulations for all the team. Is this a Christmas gift? On 2016-12-22 10:13, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know.

SMS/texts' e-mails issues...

Hello. I text/SMS through e-mails, but I noticed SeaMonkey doesn't show the text message attachments. I can see them if I display their attachments inlined though. Also, replying them with quotes fail as well. Here is an example from an e-mail's source code from an [deleted phone

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Just grab the full installer from the website. Update will likely not work for any Windows OS in this release only. Paul B. Gallagher wrote: PhillipJones wrote: Just went to help menu check for updates 2.46 come right up. Installed and currently using (mac version) I am using MacOS 12.2.2

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least tell them to go to the official web site? On 12/22/2016 1:47 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Just grab the full installer from the website. Update will likely not work for any Windows OS in this release only. ... -- Happy

Re: Am I doing this correctly ?

All good stuff. A couple of additional thoughts inserted... Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David E. Ross wrote: I have files unrelated to SeaMonkey that are no less important. I do a system-wide backup every week. In my case, nightly (mission-critical work computer). The first week I had a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Ant wrote: > Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least > tell them to go to the official web site? > > > On 12/22/2016 1:47 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> Just grab the full installer from the website. Update will likely not >> work for any Windows OS in this

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 3:04 PM, WaltS48 wrote: On 12/22/2016 05:48 PM, Ant wrote: Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least tell them to go to the official web site? You email all your friends using it, inform them of the release, with the link to the release. None of

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 4:13 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: Ant wrote: Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least tell them to go to the official web site? > That's on my TODO list right now. Thank you. I just saw your blog in

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 05:48 PM, Ant wrote: Really? How will users know there are updates then? Will they at least tell them to go to the official web site? You email all your friends using it, inform them of the release, with the link to the release. I have one in England that uses SeaMonkey.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 8:11 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 12/22/2016 2:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: >> Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! >> >> Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... >> man.. little DID I know. >> >> Erm.. oh wait. the formal

Re: Google Search Tools broken

I raised a bug here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1325048 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 22.12.2016 13:31, Ant wrote: > Also, someone said SM's home page > still shows v2.40! :( Hi, see [Bug 1325353] New: Main page still shows SeaMonkey 2.40 as latest Release CU Rainer ___

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 4:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 5:13 AM, Cruz, Jaime wrote: Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the SeaMonkey Project is