Re: About W9Gs build--Seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre

2020-09-16 Thread Daniel

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 16/09/2020 10:56 AM:

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 15/09/2020 12:59 PM:

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:

Hi,

I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre  on September 
13 (today).  I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.


The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was 
compared to the build from September 7 that I had been using.  Has 
anyone else tried any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the 
speed and responsiveness improvements.  What a difference.


BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.


Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to 
ensure the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it 
just re-using the Cached data??
I don't use the cache and have it set to use 0 mb of disk space. The 
browser was to retrieving stored data from the cache.


Hmm! Sorry, Paul, did you mean "The browser was *not set* to 
retrieving stored data from the cache."??

Yes. I don't use the cache when browsing.

O.K., so that means that when you go to a web-site, SM *must* get the 
required information anew, so things must be happening faster.


However, I expect 'The Web' is not acting faster just because you are 
using SM 2.53.5b1pre, just your computer device must be displaying 
things a bit quicker  so I'm having troubles thinking there would be 
a really noticeable speed increase ... marginal, Yeah, sure, but greatly 
increased ... don't know!!


But, if it seems so, to you, great!!
--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: About W9Gs build--Seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre

2020-09-15 Thread Paul Bergsagel

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 15/09/2020 12:59 PM:

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:

Hi,

I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre  on September 13 
(today).  I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.


The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was 
compared to the build from September 7 that I had been using.  Has 
anyone else tried any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the 
speed and responsiveness improvements.  What a difference.


BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.


Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to 
ensure the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it 
just re-using the Cached data??
I don't use the cache and have it set to use 0 mb of disk space. The 
browser was to retrieving stored data from the cache.


Hmm! Sorry, Paul, did you mean "The browser was *not set* to retrieving 
stored data from the cache."??

Yes. I don't use the cache when browsing.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: About W9Gs build--Seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre

2020-09-15 Thread Daniel

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 15/09/2020 12:59 PM:

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:

Hi,

I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre  on September 13 
(today).  I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.


The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was compared 
to the build from September 7 that I had been using.  Has anyone else 
tried any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the speed and 
responsiveness improvements.  What a difference.


BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.


Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to ensure 
the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it just 
re-using the Cached data??
I don't use the cache and have it set to use 0 mb of disk space. The 
browser was to retrieving stored data from the cache.


Hmm! Sorry, Paul, did you mean "The browser was *not set* to retrieving 
stored data from the cache."??

--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: About W9Gs build--Seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre

2020-09-14 Thread Paul Bergsagel

Daniel wrote:

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:

Hi,

I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre  on September 13 
(today).  I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.


The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was compared 
to the build from September 7 that I had been using.  Has anyone else 
tried any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the speed and 
responsiveness improvements.  What a difference.


BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.


Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to ensure 
the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it just re-using 
the Cached data??
I don't use the cache and have it set to use 0 mb of disk space. The 
browser was to retrieving stored data from the cache.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: About W9Gs build--Seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre

2020-09-13 Thread Daniel

Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:

Hi,

I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre  on September 13 
(today).  I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.


The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was compared to 
the build from September 7 that I had been using.  Has anyone else tried 
any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the speed and 
responsiveness improvements.  What a difference.


BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.


Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to ensure 
the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it just re-using 
the Cached data??

--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey