Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-24 Thread Martin Feitag
Ray_Net schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-24 Thread ad...@mmri.us
Brian Mailman wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. In

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Martin Feitag
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? ___ support-seamonkey mailing

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Daniel
ad...@mmri.us wrote: We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads. I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated. Post as you wish. Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: snip Sorryyou top post because top posting, in your opinion, is

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread ad...@mmri.us
Whatever pleases you. Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: In that case, begone. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...? no, each folder has a 2 gig limit:

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Brian Mailman
ad...@mmri.us wrote: We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads. I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated. Post as you wish. If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. B/

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread ad...@mmri.us
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. B/ ___

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Ray_Net
Martin Feitag wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb: Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive. I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Rob Steinmetz
POP, The server is Exim4 and dovecote I don't expect to do this often. I have one partner who keeps her messages on the sever for a long time, as a sort of safety mechanism. She downloads them constantly. I was setting up a new computer for her and downloading the messages happened as a

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Rob Steinmetz
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Martin Feitag wrote: furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows. Perhaps that is the reason for the problem I don't think so since each message is transferred and then appended to the folder(file) individually. How would the file size limit affect

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread Brian Mailman
ad...@mmri.us wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice. In cyberspace, no one can hear

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-23 Thread NoOp
On 04/23/2009 06:59 PM, Brian Mailman wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: Brian Mailman wrote: If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may oblige you and not read them. That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts. Everyone is entitled to

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-22 Thread Rob Steinmetz
Email Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: Rob Steinmetz wrote: That is you download more than 39,897 messages the counter runs backwards? It reads; Downloading 1 of 40767 Downloading 1 of 40766 Downloading 1 of 40765 Until you get to 38,897 then it reads properly, except the maximum value is 39,897

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-22 Thread Hartmut Figge
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo: Perhaps that is the reason for the problem If the phenomenon exists it should also be valid for newsgroups. Easy to test. Join a newsgroup with more than 40,000 postings, enter it and decide to download all headers. Hartmut, too lazy :)

Re: Does anyone care about this?

2009-04-22 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)
ad...@mmri.us wrote: We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads. I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated. Post as you wish. Moz Champion (Dan) wrote: ad...@mmri.us wrote: That's nothing. I am running over 8GB and have all my mails since 1998 and