Ray_Net schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all
Brian Mailman wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read,
they may oblige you and not read them.
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my
posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice.
In
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...?
___
support-seamonkey mailing
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
snip
Sorryyou top post because top posting, in your opinion, is
Whatever pleases you.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
In that case, begone.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
___
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at a time...?
no, each folder has a 2 gig limit:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they may
oblige you and not read them.
B/
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my posts.
Everyone is entitled to their choice.
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read, they
may oblige you and not read them.
B/
___
Martin Feitag wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo schrieb:
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
That's a memory limit per application, not the file limit on the drive.
I don't think SM stores all mails into RAM at
POP, The server is Exim4 and dovecote
I don't expect to do this often.
I have one partner who keeps her messages on the sever for a long time,
as a sort of safety mechanism. She downloads them constantly.
I was setting up a new computer for her and downloading the messages
happened as a
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Martin Feitag wrote:
furthermore, there is a 2 gig limit for windows.
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
I don't think so since each message is transferred and then appended to
the folder(file) individually. How would the file size limit affect
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read,
they may oblige you and not read them.
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my
posts. Everyone is entitled to their choice.
In cyberspace, no one can hear
On 04/23/2009 06:59 PM, Brian Mailman wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
Brian Mailman wrote:
If you wish to make your messages difficult for others to read,
they may oblige you and not read them.
That is perfectly fine, and in order with me if they don't read my
posts. Everyone is entitled to
Email
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
That is you download more than 39,897 messages the counter runs
backwards?
It reads;
Downloading 1 of 40767
Downloading 1 of 40766
Downloading 1 of 40765
Until you get to 38,897 then it reads properly, except the maximum
value is 39,897
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo:
Perhaps that is the reason for the problem
If the phenomenon exists it should also be valid for newsgroups. Easy to
test. Join a newsgroup with more than 40,000 postings, enter it and
decide to download all headers.
Hartmut, too lazy :)
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
We have been through this to death. Please see previous threads.
I as well as others top post as in my opinion it is outdated.
Post as you wish.
Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
ad...@mmri.us wrote:
That's nothing.
I am running over 8GB and have all my mails since 1998 and
16 matches
Mail list logo