Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-14 Thread Daniel
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 04:57 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: NoOp wrote: Don't know... on one machine I have headers back to 3/27/2006 and I added the 'attachments' column. Sorting on that column and scrolling through it yields no attachments. Perhaps

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-14 Thread Philip Chee
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:39:52 -0700, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: If I could scream here it would be at the dead heads running this server for making a free service (support) so damned difficult. I'm sure you would get a lot of support for that, except from

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server block all messages with attachments hogwash! I've sent many posts here with attachments Peter, You may have been

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread NoOp
On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server block all messages with attachments hogwash! I've

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server block all messages with attachments

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Michael Gordon
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 10:48 AM Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server block all messages with attachments hogwash! I've

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Michael Gordon
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 2:45 PM NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Michael Gordon wrote: If I could scream here it would be at the dead heads running this server for making a free service (support) so damned difficult. I'm sure you would get a lot of support for that, except from the dead heads running this server. :-) -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Daniel
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread NoOp
On 03/13/2009 12:45 PM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: NoOp wrote: Don't know... on one machine I have headers back to 3/27/2006 and I added the 'attachments' column. Sorting on that column and scrolling through it yields no attachments. Perhaps it was further back than that?

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Barry Edwin Gilmour
NoOp wrote: Don't know... on one machine I have headers back to 3/27/2006 and I added the 'attachments' column. Sorting on that column and scrolling through it yields no attachments. Perhaps it was further back than that? Maybe stripped attachments, or file too-big for filter? search back

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread NoOp
On 03/13/2009 04:57 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: NoOp wrote: Don't know... on one machine I have headers back to 3/27/2006 and I added the 'attachments' column. Sorting on that column and scrolling through it yields no attachments. Perhaps it was further back than that? Maybe stripped

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 04:57 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: NoOp wrote: Don't know... on one machine I have headers back to 3/27/2006 and I added the 'attachments' column. Sorting on that column and scrolling through it yields no attachments. Perhaps it was further back than that?

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 2:45 PM NoOp wrote: On 03/13/2009 08:48 AM, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/13/2009 12:44 AM Michael

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread Michael Gordon
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/10/2009 9:15 PM Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done it before?? Daniel there are a lot

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread Daniel
Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/10/2009 9:15 PM Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done it before??

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread MKC
Daniel wrote: Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/10/2009 9:15 PM Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread Michael Gordon
Daniel replied On 3/12/2009 6:55 PM Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/10/2009 9:15 PM Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread MKC
Michael Gordon wrote: Daniel replied On 3/12/2009 6:55 PM Michael Gordon wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo replied On 3/10/2009 9:15 PM Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-12 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Michael Gordon wrote: The reason everything is so cryptic here is because this news server block all messages with attachments hogwash! I've sent many posts here with attachments -- *IMPORTANT*: Sorry folks, but I cannot provide email help Emails to me may become public Notice: This

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-11 Thread Terry R.
The date and time was Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:37:37 PM, and on a whim, jim pounded out on the keyboard: Margaret Sent me the Attachments re This matter by Email fella's. Mail me if you want them ,as I've saved them. Regards. jim PS The Said ca'nt be sent here, as I've tried Attaching +

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked Size on My list. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked Size on My list. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel
jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done it before?? Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
David Email me jmk...@optusnet.com.au I'll send you MKC'S beaut directions. Regards. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread Leonidas Jones
Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done it before?? Daniel I'm missing it too??? Lee ___

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
Daniel wrote: jim wrote: Thanks Margaret. you've done it Again. Cheers. jim ps ticked_ Size_ on My list. I'm missing Margret's reply (twice). What did she suggest and when has Margaret done it before?? Daniel there are a lot of people here who will email you the answer rather than

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
Margaret Sent me the Attachments re This matter by Email fella's. Mail me if you want them ,as I've saved them. Regards. jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Post Size in Bytes

2009-03-10 Thread jim
Margaret Sent me the Attachments re This matter by Email fella's. Mail me if you want them ,as I've saved them. Regards. jim PS The Said ca'nt be sent here, as I've tried Attaching + Inserting them,No go. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list