Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
3) You are free to work on speeding up JS in Mozilla even more, the
code is all open and contributors are always welcome.
Even if someone were to port webkit to SM, I can't imagine you breaking
with FF and actually competing with it on features.
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Then again, whats a few seconds. So what if SM is a few seconds slower
than safari.
Those seconds add up quickly.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Bill Davidsen wrote:
and I do think that there are people who will choose a browser based on
rendering speed.
that might be so, but there are people who will base
their decissions on what they like, not what someone
else will tell them.
Then again, whats a few seconds. So what if SM is a
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I saw these today:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/09/02/26/Safari_4_rivals_Google_Chrome_in_JavaScript_race_1.html?source=NLC-DAILYcgd=2009-02-26
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9128512
and I do think that there are people
4 matches
Mail list logo
