Re: less secure apps

2016-08-29 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:59:51 +0800, /Philip Chee/: Intresting tidbit: During development, Several Thunderbird developers wanted to their Oauth2 option to be labelled "less secure Google authentication". Now that my company has enforced usage of 2-factor authentication for the Google services

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Jonathan N. Little
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:52:08 -0400, /Jonathan N. Little/: I can see it as available option on all my IMAP accounts, but Christian Riechers pointed in another reply: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:34:16 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:52:08 -0400, /Jonathan N. Little/: Philip Chee wrote: Intresting tidbit: During development, Several Thunderbird developers wanted to their Oauth2 option to be labelled "less secure Google authentication". :-) Good one! But Oauth2 option is still not available in

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:59:51 +0800, /Philip Chee/: The Oauth2 code is 100% shared with Thunderbird. It's also 100% written by the Thunderbird developers, so everything should work identically. It might be down to the settings made by the admin of your company Google account. Yes, turned out to

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Jonathan N. Little
Philip Chee wrote: On 16/04/2016 16:33, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: I've tried changing the Server Settings / Authentication method of my Gmail account (in SeaMonkey) to "OAuth2", and the first time I've tried to open the Inbox I've been presented with a web form (in a new window) to log in.

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Philip Chee
On 16/04/2016 16:33, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > I've tried changing the Server Settings / Authentication method of > my Gmail account (in SeaMonkey) to "OAuth2", and the first time I've > tried to open the Inbox I've been presented with a web form (in a > new window) to log in. Then I've

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:33:53 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:16:29 -0500, »Q« wrote: According to , Thunderbird has supports it as of v. 38, so maybe it's coming to SeaMonkey. I've tried changing the Server Settings /

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Christian Riechers
On 04/16/2016 12:05 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: >> For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com >> domains. > > Doesn't appear true given my later comment. I probably should have been more specific. OAuth2 can

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:10:58 -0500, »Q« wrote: By default, Google only accepts OAuth 2.0 authentication. Enabling access by what Google calls "less secure apps" just lets you (or your SeaMonkey) use other methods of secure authentication to log in to your Gmail account. Except for Google itself,

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:54:11 +0200, /Christian Riechers/: For Thunderbird OAuth2 only works for the gmail.com and googlemail.com domains. Doesn't appear true given my later comment. On 04/16/2016 10:33 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: It's interesting that a colleague of mine using Thunderbird

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Christian Riechers
On 04/16/2016 10:33 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:16:29 -0500, »Q« wrote: >> In , >> Rick Merrill wrote: >>> I have not heard of OAuth 2.0 - an open standard - is it not >>> compatible with

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-16 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:16:29 -0500, »Q« wrote: In , Rick Merrill wrote: I have not heard of OAuth 2.0 - an open standard - is it not compatible with seamonkey? I don't know. According to

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-13 Thread »Q«
In , Rick Merrill wrote: > I have not heard of OAuth 2.0 - an open standard - is it not > compatible with seamonkey? I don't know. According to , Thunderbird

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-13 Thread Rick Merrill
On 4/13/2016 11:10 AM, »Q« wrote: In , Rick Merrill wrote: - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=2852231 I just ran into this and could not receive gmail via SeaMonkey. The solution in my case was

Re: less secure apps

2016-04-13 Thread »Q«
In , Rick Merrill wrote: > - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39=2852231 > > I just ran into this and could not receive gmail via SeaMonkey. The > solution in my case was to enable "less secure