Re: To go from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.57 ?

2020-05-03 Thread Ray_Net
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 02-05-20 23:33: Ray_Net wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 21-04-20 10:24: Ray_Net wrote: So the questions is: - Could I pass from 2.49.1 to 2.57 in one step ? No. NSS is no longer backwoard compatible. We need to soon put a hard block in to go thru 2.53.1 to .3

Re: To go from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.57 ?

2020-05-02 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Ray_Net wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 21-04-20 10:24: Ray_Net wrote: So the questions is: - Could I pass from 2.49.1 to 2.57 in one step ? No. NSS is no longer backwoard compatible. We need to soon put a hard block in to go thru 2.53.1 to .3 first. So the best way is : - pass from

Re: To go from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.57 ?

2020-05-02 Thread WaltS48
On 5/2/20 4:44 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 21-04-20 10:24: Ray_Net wrote: So the questions is: - Could I pass from 2.49.1 to 2.57 in one step ? No. NSS is no longer backwoard compatible. We need to soon put a hard block in to go thru 2.53.1 to .3 first. So the best way

To go from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.57 ?

2020-05-02 Thread Ray_Net
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 21-04-20 10:24: Ray_Net wrote: So the questions is: - Could I pass from 2.49.1 to 2.57 in one step ? No. NSS is no longer backwoard compatible. We need to soon put a hard block in to go thru 2.53.1 to .3 first. So the best way is : - pass from 2.49.1 to 2.53.3