[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Quoting Steffen Schwientek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can?t connect to my freenet-core. If I point my browser to
localhost:, i just get not found.
Once you run the startup script, it will take a couple minutes (sic) for
the
node to start. Believe it or not,
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits
connection
(based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity).
You would want to adjust:
On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:58 pm, David Masover wrote:
| not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for
| choosing Java should be obvious; platform independence and a
| rich API that comes standard with the language.
As a purely academic argument, Parrot and .NET both do those
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
Unfortunately sometimes the providers put in some NAT boxes or a proxy
that prevents this system from
Anyway, how does the code work? Is it open source? Does it use UPP?
Could we adapt it?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
Unfortunately
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I installed from
Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I installed
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:06:46AM -0400, Stephen P. Schaefer wrote:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple
days
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured
freenet correctly and forwarded the right ports I although createt an
dyndns.org account only for freenet
To get the node running well (ip in dydns.org
database is up to date) ! But when I try to open a site I got the message
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Florian Streck wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:30:57PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Saw the port 8891 in freenet.conf only today What are distribution
servlets used for? My nodes seems to be running ok with this port
Dynamo wrote:
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet
correctly and forwarded the right ports I although createt an
dyndns.org account only for freenet
To get the node running well (ip in dydns.org database is up to date)
! But when I try to open a site I got the
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us with monthly bandwidth caps.
It does?! I
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:27:35AM +0200, Dynamo wrote:
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet correctly and
forwarded the right ports I although createt an dyndns.org account only for
freenet
Do you have incoming connections on
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:21:17AM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
Joachim Scharfetter wrote:
Hi, I have got a fair use DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped
Toad wrote:
Please CC the original poster if at all possible in future. Mostly they
aren't subscribers. Thanks.
Sorry, different email client to the one I normally use. Serves me right for posting
to the list at work :P
Anyway, noted, I'll remember hopefully.
Joachim Scharfetter schrieb:
Hi, I have got a fair use DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
Depends on the personal use. In an idle-state (when I'm not browsing
freesites or downloading splitfiles) my stable node
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works
right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN
JRE. I've had Freenet running on
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:03:22PM +0100, Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
Unfortunately sometimes the providers put in
When was outputBandwidthLimit EVER in kilobytes/sec? Maybe the Windows
configurator used kB/sec...
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:46:29AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Yes, it works really
Todd, now that you're back with us: Obviously going into the 100% state
after loosing a connection does nothing beneficial for the network. If
I kill my note each evening in anticipation of the death and then
reactivate it when I regain rationality the next day will this on-n-off
activity of
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Changing bandwidth limits on the fly may be quite difficult, but we'll get
| around to it eventually.. :)
Really? Would it be feasable to do an Apache-style graceful restart?
~ (Since files that are really too big should have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report...
Unless it's causing my slowness, blackdown works fine for me. I'd
rather be using Kaffe, but I've had issues making that work on Gentoo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
25 matches
Mail list logo