Re: [freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 21 September 2008 03:16, Art Charbonneau wrote: On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active even though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something amiss? Also, when Firefox (ver 3.02) comes up, there is no menu item 'Tools', so I

Re: [freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 05:29, Luke771 wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:56:13 -0700 gofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My terminology was wrong: I should have said 'inserts', not 'uploads'. for the most part we use the two terms interchangeably Under 'Current Activity' I see 'Inserts',

Re: [freenet-support] About Freenet protocol

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 12 September 2008 17:03, Andrew Surzhenko wrote: Hello, I'm a developer from Ukraine. I have to create small Freenet client (file sharing only), but it seems that it is problem to find Freenet protocol specification. Can you tell me, is it closed protocol, or where can I find this

Re: [freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Luke771
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:56:23 +0100 Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is no difference. But the stats on the homepage are *low level* inserts, being passed through your node. On the downloads/uploads page, we are talking about high level inserts originated by you. OK,

[freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Luke771
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 19:16:19 -0700 Art Charbonneau wrote: > On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active even > though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something amiss? You sure you didnt start the uploads from another app, like Thaw? --

[freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Luke771
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:05:35 -0400 urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: >On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Art Charbonneau wrote: >> On my freenet homepage I noticed in the stats that 5 uploads were active >> even though I had not initiated any uploads. Is this normal, or is something >> amiss? > Yes,

[freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Luke771
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:56:13 -0700 gofer wrote: > My terminology was wrong: I should have said 'inserts', not 'uploads'. for the most part we use the two terms interchangeably >Under 'Current Activity' I see 'Inserts', 'Requests', and 'Transferring >Requests'. Ah, that's what you meant? I

[freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
ed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/8cb56f8f/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Unauthorized upload?

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
level inserts originated by you. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/0c77b0bd/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Autostarting Freenet on FreeBSD server

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
an answer... -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/46cbfb17/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] About Freenet protocol

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
t; With Best Regards, > Andrew Surzhenko > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080923/0c030066/attachment.pgp>