Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 09:29, Luke771 wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:32:18 -0500 Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:16:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00), vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Node won't start. I did a full manual update with update.cmd, same result.

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:33, Ulrich Koepping wrote: I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys. Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately :

Re: [freenet-support] Broken freesites in #1178

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 16 November 2008 11:08, SmallSister development wrote: Hello, I've noted that freesites that are recently updated (The Ultimate FreeNet Index) appear broken. My personal freesite (that was inserted with jSite after the announcement of the tar.gz sites) shows the same problem.

Re: [freenet-support] Some downloads failing since updating to 1178

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
1181 should fix this. On Friday 14 November 2008 22:01, Victor Denisov wrote: Several downloads from my download queue failed to start after my node autoupgraded to 1178 (some *did* restart normally). Error messages (Reason column in the Failed downloads) in the web interface vary:

[freenet-support] 1180 - peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2008-11-22 Thread Adrian Tritschler
Has happened with 1178, 1179 and now 1180 Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us

[freenet-support] What to do via command line

2008-11-22 Thread Markus Hahn
Dear Supporters, dear Dennis. On Fri Nov 14 20:50:36 UTC 2008Dennis Nezic asked me: Out of curiosity, what kinds of things were you looking to do via thecommand line? Well, I'm using a quite old notebook with a harddisc of 30 GB in it and - more important - with a no more than 512 MB RAM

Re: [freenet-support] What to do via command line

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 22 November 2008 05:33, Markus Hahn wrote: Dear Supporters, dear Dennis. On Fri Nov 14 20:50:36 UTC 2008Dennis Nezic asked me: Out of curiosity, what kinds of things were you looking to do via thecommand line? Well, I'm using a quite old notebook with a harddisc of 30 GB

Re: [freenet-support] 1180 - peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 20 November 2008 07:52, Adrian Tritschler wrote: Has happened with 1178, 1179 and now 1180 Thanks. We do need to know whether this goes away ... we don't have a fix yet though. Keep watching the support list, when we think we've fixed it we will say so in a new build announcement.

[freenet-support] New windows updater script, recent chaos

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
We have a new update.cmd (command line updater script for Windows). If your Windows-based node won't start, please run update.cmd (in the folder Freenet is installed in, from a command line), and hopefully it will resolve the problem. You will need to manually start Freenet after the update

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread guido
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1 while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is 3.2.3. That looks strange. I have got that exact same warning in my logs as well. It has been like this

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1 while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is 3.2.3. That looks

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido wrote: Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
t doesn't have the required freenet-ext.jar. So the only way to fix your node is to download the freenet-ext.jar manually, as Luke suggests. Or wait for the new update.cmd, which should be out any minute now. Sorry, this will have cost us quite a few nodes... :< -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/53f92e44/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
eenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/a73511da/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Broken freesites in #1178

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
" sites) shows the same problem. 1181 should fix this. > > Peter. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/

[freenet-support] Some downloads failing since updating to 1178

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
ext attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/1d129774/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] What to do via command line

2008-11-22 Thread Markus Hahn
or to freenet. By the way this is quite annoying. Thanks for your help. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/73a62452/attachment.html>

[freenet-support] What to do via command line

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
it's not something we can fix before approximately 0.10. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/6b914435/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] 1180 - peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/ce26cf69/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] New windows updater script, recent chaos

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Toseland
: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081122/8bb39cf8/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread guido
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: > >> > WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version "3.3.1" > > while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is "3.2.3". > > That looks strange. I have got that exact same warning in my logs as well. It has

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: > > >> > WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version > > >> > "3.3.1" > > > while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is > > > "3.2.3". > > > > That

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido > wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: >> > >> > WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version >> >

[freenet-support] Bug report

2008-11-22 Thread toadsfri...@hushmail.com
1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what