Arne Babenhauserheide (2017-02-21 18:44:48 +0100) wrote: > Do I remember correctly that the bundler replicates the site as is — > with all its dangers to privacy? (Freenet provides heavy whitelist > filtering to protect its users from uploaded content).
Sorry, but I do not know the software that much, but thanks for the heads up, it'll be useful if we decide to work more on bundler. > >> > 3. Access to censored dynamic content (i.e. web apps) is > >> > possible. > >> > >> That’s a hard one. You’d need to remodel the web apps to use > >> Freenet as backend instead of the clearnet. > >> > >> I do not think that it is possible at all to provide anything which > >> uses Javascript and at the same time preserve the anonymity of your > >> users. > > > > Yeah, that's a hard one, that's why we may probably end up combining > > several tools. > > You could even go as far as simply re-developing popular tools on top > of Freenet as locally running tools. That might turn out to be easier > than trying to secure javascript. Yes probably, but we have limited resources and code reuse may save much effort. For some particular components providing a "more native" solution may still be feasible, and the projects you're working (and mainly babcom) on may be of special interest there.`:)` Thanks again for your advice! -- Ivan Vilata i Balaguer _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
